They Will Get The mRNA Into You One Way Or Another Putting it in the influenza vaccine

a reply to: tanstaafl

fair enough as I see it the direction of travel we are locked into what happens next but in doing this they are risking their precious seats of power which they've been trying to save since 2007/8, they keep using the same fixes as that's all they know so now we have a west in total lockstep and with no answers until this winter when it all starts to come apart as the various crisis collide in one unholy mess..

a reply to: tanstaafl
Um yes?

How about you just leave this to every ones personal decision, period, whether some random stranger (you) says you have to or not.

I am vaccine damaged, go take a look. But I won't shun other's for their personal decision.

Basta.

originally posted by: Antisocialist
If You think you have avoided the clot shot so far, you need to be aware of their next attempt to get this deadly therapy into as many arms as they can.
There are now clinical trials going on incorporating mRNA gene therapy in with the annual influenza vaccines. Yes, that's right, they are going to get this crap into you one way or another.

Who Is Robert Malone

Sounding the Alarm: Normalizing the Jab with Lies
Endless mRNA vaccines are in the works, as the CDC and FDA play "hide the data"
Based on COVID-19 ‘messenger’ RNA or mRNA vaccines, the new flu vaccines could better protect people from multiple types of flu. First up for testing: older people.

Moderna has created a new vaccine that aims to provide combined protection against both flu and COVID-19, including the most recent variants of COVID-19

(The clinical trial director) expects to start testing Moderna’s combined flu/COVID-19 vaccine in the late summer or early fall.

Colorado (UC Health) already has an “mRNA vaccine for influenza” clinical trial that is already enrolling, and this one is about to enroll. What does this mean?
This means that these mRNA combo vaccines are again being given status as a “vaccine,” and not a gene therapy product. Otherwise, pre-clinical development would have taken much, much longer.

That the use of pseudouridine has been given the green light again, without further preclinical testing on safety. That the length of time the mRNA continues to make protein once in the body and levels of protein expressed over time has not been assessed in an animal body prior to the onset of these trials. This is shocking.

It appears that the FDA also did not require more testing of the nano lipid particles for safety, reproductive toxicity and bio-distribution in an animal model. This assumption is again based on the short timeline to clinical trial for these products.

This also implies that there have been no further pre-clinical studies regarding the spike protein as a toxin in the combination flu/COVID-19 mRNA vaccine candidate.

UCHealth

Clinical trials for ‘entirely new’ mRNA flu vaccines launching soon. Will they work better?
Based on COVID-19 ‘messenger’ RNA or mRNA vaccines, the new flu vaccines could better protect people from multiple types of flu. First up for testing: older people.

Did'n get your clot shot the first time? Soon, you will get it the next time you go in for your annual flue shot.

Cheers!

LOL, never had a flu shot, never will. Other shots? Yes, in 1970 when I was 5 and that was the last time.

LOL, never had a flu shot, never will. Other shots? Yes, in 1970 when I was 5 and that was the last time.

Same here, never had a Flu shot, had it a few winter times, naturally through infection I guess, but never confirmed by lab tests, just Flu which lasted couple of weeks lol.

Covid on the other hand I've had confirmed 3 times by the governme, 2020 and 2021. It was as horrible as flu but no worse, and I obviously survived lol, but I'm definitely definitely not taking any experimental 'vaccine' now, for a virus which doesn't really kill healthy people!

Total scam 2 years ago, and the new combined covid-flu jab is just the evolution of the original scam... I'll rather catch both again and trust my own body as I have all my nearly 50 years alive!😁

originally posted by: TDDAgain
a reply to: tanstaafl

Ummm... no.

Unless you can provide me the logic path that allows one to understand and realize that these people are evil and are doing this on purpose with these mRNA clot shots, and are now revealing their intention to infect the flu jabs with the same flawed and deadly tech, but still maintain a belief that these very same people can still be trusted with respect to all of the other jabs.

Of course, I am not suggesting that people be actively prevented from voluntarily taking them, as I am not a tyrant.

But I will always ask the hard questions, and point out the irrational illogic of trusting these bastards with even a toy water gun, much less your lives and/or the lives of your children.

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: TDDAgain
a reply to: tanstaafl

Ummm... no.

Unless you can provide me the logic path that allows one to understand and realize that these people are evil and are doing this on purpose with these mRNA clot shots, and are now revealing their intention to infect the flu jabs with the same flawed and deadly tech, but still maintain a belief that these very same people can still be trusted with respect to all of the other jabs.

Of course, I am not suggesting that people be actively prevented from voluntarily taking them, as I am not a tyrant.

But I will always ask the hard questions, and point out the irrational illogic of trusting these bastards with even a toy water gun, much less your lives and/or the lives of your children.

The clotting isn't to do with it being an mRNA based shot. It's primarily to do with the astrazeneca package.

a reply to: tanstaafl

You are barking up the wrong tree. Just saying.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: TDDAgain
a reply to: tanstaafl

Ummm... no.

Unless you can provide me the logic path that allows one to understand and realize that these people are evil and are doing this on purpose with these mRNA clot shots, and are now revealing their intention to infect the flu jabs with the same flawed and deadly tech, but still maintain a belief that these very same people can still be trusted with respect to all of the other jabs.

Of course, I am not suggesting that people be actively prevented from voluntarily taking them, as I am not a tyrant.

But I will always ask the hard questions, and point out the irrational illogic of trusting these bastards with even a toy water gun, much less your lives and/or the lives of your children.

The clotting isn't to do with it being an mRNA based shot. It's primarily to do with the astrazeneca package.

WRONG.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: tanstaafl
The clotting isn't to do with it being an mRNA based shot. It's primarily to do with the astrazeneca package.

That's all ya got? Color me surprised (not)...

Rotflmao!!!

originally posted by: TDDAgain
a reply to: tanstaafl

You are barking up the wrong tree. Just saying.

So... you can't even attempt to make an argument, let alone a rational, logical one.

Got it. Thanks for ... nothing.

a reply to: tanstaafl

Why should I argue with you or bring up arguments? I voiced my stance on the mRNA vaccines and mandates a thousand times on this board and if you are not aware of it or obtuse about it, despite my hints, then that's a waste of time for me.

I really don't care about your opinion about me, there are posters on this board where I do, but you are not one of them and your behavior does not really foster any additional care.

Go figure.

a reply to: Antisocialist

my doctor told me to my face that they would be doing this as the virus is now a thing forever.

but in reality the people who didnt get the shot arent going to get their flu shots

Serious question for everyone. Why have the flu shots never been advertised to protect others like the covid vaccines have? Wouldn't it be the same logic? If you don't get the flu shot, you could get the flu and infect others but this strategy seems to have only been used with Covid.

Speaking of that, no other vaccine was used in this way either. I don't get a tetanus shot to protect others. I didn't take the hepatitus vaccine schedule to protect you, it was to protect me.

Does anyone have a logical explination to how taking the covid vaccine protects others? What's different?

originally posted by: litterbaux
Serious question for everyone. Why have the flu shots never been advertised to protect others like the covid vaccines have? Wouldn't it be the same logic? If you don't get the flu shot, you could get the flu and infect others but this strategy seems to have only been used with Covid.

Speaking of that, no other vaccine was used in this way either. I don't get a tetanus shot to protect others. I didn't take the hepatitus vaccine schedule to protect you, it was to protect me.

Does anyone have a logical explination to how taking the covid vaccine protects others? What's different?

It was all a lie. The CDC is slowly getting around to this fact by eventually saying it was a mistake.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

And again, you refuse to post a source.

originally posted by: litterbaux
Serious question for everyone. Why have the flu shots never been advertised to protect others like the covid vaccines have? Wouldn't it be the same logic? If you don't get the flu shot, you could get the flu and infect others but this strategy seems to have only been used with Covid.

Speaking of that, no other vaccine was used in this way either. I don't get a tetanus shot to protect others. I didn't take the hepatitus vaccine schedule to protect you, it was to protect me.

Does anyone have a logical explination to how taking the covid vaccine protects others? What's different?

Maybe the TV commercials on the stations you watch don't say that.

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: tanstaafl
The clotting isn't to do with it being an mRNA based shot. It's primarily to do with the astrazeneca package.

That's all ya got? Color me surprised (not)...

Rotflmao!!!

OK, how many people in the US have had clots with any other vax?

Not very many people take flu shots, especially men. Only the elderly take flu shots. Young men practically never take flu shots.

a reply to: TongHuaGuShi

It's mostly for the elderly and the very young, so that's what you'd expect. They're the groups that it's targeted at.

Take up is pretty high where I live. Also with other vax. It's why we have such low rate of things like Measles, TB and similar things.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: tanstaafl
OK, how many people in the US have had clots with any other vax?

No one can answer that question, because the data is being suppressed and or is unavailable.