Polio Caused By The Filthy Unvaxxed

a reply to: Narvasis

Not quite. This outbreak was caused by the countries that still use the live polio vaccine. I'm vaccinated against polio, along with my friends and family members, and frankly do not care if any of the unvaxxed end up paralyzed or what not. We are talking about small numbers of people who are not vaccinated against polio in the U.S., anyway, as over 93% of Americans have been vaccinated.

a reply to: Narvasis

Read this


New York detects vaccine-derived polio case

t likely came from a transmission chain involving someone who got the oral polio vaccine (OPV), which hasn't been used in the United States since 2000. The country switched that year to the inactivated polio vaccine (IPV), which is given as an injection. Rockland County is part of the New York City metro area. The OPV link suggests that the virus may have originated outside of the United States in a country where OPV is still used. Revertant strains can't come from inactivated vaccines.

People come to New York , from other countrys.....just saying

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: Narvasis

I am a bit confused by this one. Most of us are vaxxed against Polio. And back then, in the before the definition of a "vaccine" had been changed time, we were supposed to be immune to Polio because of the vaccine. So if you are vaxxed already, you have no worries. What kind of numbers are we talking about for unvaxxed people in the US with regard to Polio?

The vax isn't 100 percent effective, and there are a fair few anti-vaxxers who haven't been vaxxed, not to mention people whose parents simply never got them vaxxed due to cost or hassle.

Plus, there are large immigrant communities in places like NCY who come from countries where vaxxing against Polio has been disrupted by things like war or poverty.

originally posted by: TheLieWeLive
a reply to: Narvasis

Funny how all these diseases are resurfacing and spreading just after a pushed vaccination worldwide.

It's not sudden or unexpected, it's been predicted for quite a while now due to disruption in vax programs in Africa and the middle east due to war and groups like the Taliban. It's endemic in a lot of places where the US gets a lot of immigrants from.

Take Afghanistan, the polio campaign there has been significantly disrupted, and there are thousands of new Afghani refugees coming in.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: Narvasis

I am a bit confused by this one. Most of us are vaxxed against Polio. And back then, in the before the definition of a "vaccine" had been changed time, we were supposed to be immune to Polio because of the vaccine. So if you are vaxxed already, you have no worries. What kind of numbers are we talking about for unvaxxed people in the US with regard to Polio?

The vax isn't 100 percent effective, and there are a fair few anti-vaxxers who haven't been vaxxed, not to mention people whose parents simply never got them vaxxed due to cost or hassle.

Plus, there are large immigrant communities in places like NCY who come from countries where vaxxing against Polio has been disrupted by things like war or poverty.

so the polio vaccine I got as a kid is no longer working. What about the small pox? What about the dozens of shots I got in the military? Jesus Christ, we are all going to die, aren't we?

Oh, I'm so scared now, it used to be Germans we had to worry about, now it's just germs! ARRGggggggggggggggg!!!!!

originally posted by: Narvasis
Welp, you have done it again! You filthy unclean, unwashed, unvaxxed monsters! How could you do this to everyone else?? As if we didn't have enough sickness and death with the deadliest pandemic in human history! You monsters are now causing polio to run rampant in our major cities wastewater, take a good look at yourself in the mirror, then spit out that disgusting unvaxxed saliva down the drain. Couldn't go outside, now I can't even drink water! The humanity!

Polio cause by you filth

I'm pretty sure I remember reading that Polio was caused by people drinking the same water that horses drank .
I know you're joking , but some may believe it

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Narvasis

Umm not sure if your post was hard sarcasm or harsh judgement?

Most Americans have a polio vax. Even those who refused the experimental
Covid vax, most have a polio vax.

This is where it gets touchy; many immigrants who are not here
legally do not have a polio vax. So, your pointed pointing might
be pointing to protected class of people who are minorities and
also poor, and seeking asylum.

AND, they don't have TheRONA Vax either !!!!!! 😁

And, they wear the cheap non-N95 masks 😁

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes
a reply to: burntheships

I'm pretty sure they have polio shots in Latin-America too.

Maybe they tend to use vaccines that are expired and unrefrigerated or are counterfeit 😁

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: TheLieWeLive
a reply to: Narvasis

Funny how all these diseases are resurfacing and spreading just after a pushed vaccination worldwide.

It's not sudden or unexpected, it's been predicted for quite a while now due to disruption in vax programs in Africa and the middle east due to war and groups like the Taliban. It's endemic in a lot of places where the US gets a lot of immigrants from.

Take Afghanistan, the polio campaign there has been significantly disrupted, and there are thousands of new Afghani refugees coming in.

Funny how the pandemic skipped the unvaccinated continent of Africa, but the highest vaccinated countries like South Korea experienced a record number of deaths this year. Seems like its working amazingly well.

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: Narvasis

I am a bit confused by this one. ...

If there is actually a resurgence of polio (and it think it's probably just another of their incessant fear campaigns- COVID, COVID variants, ebola, monkeypox, ad infinitum), you'll note that it coincides with the Beijing Joe sponsored influx of illegal aliens.

The US government is not beyond committing covert biological warfare. It could well be part of the plan. You introduce a wave of unhealthy people and allow them to infect an otherwise healthy population. That absolutely is a biological warfare strategy. It's actually much smarter than directly releasing a pathogen into a population. To release a pathogen directly leaves a trail of culpability. When they allow infected people into a population and the disease is then introduced and spread, it's much easier to say, OOPS!

(Sometimes I wonder if comments like this are getting me on a list somewhere. But I'm pretty sure I'm already on a few, so there's that.)

a reply to: Lysergic

Damn, that's nasty!

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: Narvasis

I am a bit confused by this one. Most of us are vaxxed against Polio. And back then, in the before the definition of a "vaccine" had been changed time, we were supposed to be immune to Polio because of the vaccine. So if you are vaxxed already, you have no worries. What kind of numbers are we talking about for unvaxxed people in the US with regard to Polio?

The vax isn't 100 percent effective, and there are a fair few anti-vaxxers who haven't been vaxxed, not to mention people whose parents simply never got them vaxxed due to cost or hassle.

Plus, there are large immigrant communities in places like NCY who come from countries where vaxxing against Polio has been disrupted by things like war or poverty.

so the polio vaccine I got as a kid is no longer working. What about the small pox? What about the dozens of shots I got in the military? Jesus Christ, we are all going to die, aren't we?

Oh, I'm so scared now, it used to be Germans we had to worry about, now it's just germs! ARRGggggggggggggggg!!!!!

If you'd watch the Whitehouse press briefings you'd know that a vax is considered to be effective when it provides over over around 85 percent protection, which is around where the decades old measles and chickenpox vaxes are. You'd also know that the effectiveness increases again if you are infected, shortening the time and the severity of the infection. Potentially to the level that you're asymptomatic.

I don't have access to your vaccination details, so you may be 60-80 percent protected, or less for some things. The shots that you got in the military might require boosters, depending on how long ago they were.

a reply to: Lysergic

Those poor dogs.

There is a similar story out of Italy today.

What is going on???

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: Narvasis

I am a bit confused by this one. Most of us are vaxxed against Polio. And back then, in the before the definition of a "vaccine" had been changed time, we were supposed to be immune to Polio because of the vaccine. So if you are vaxxed already, you have no worries. What kind of numbers are we talking about for unvaxxed people in the US with regard to Polio?

The vax isn't 100 percent effective, and there are a fair few anti-vaxxers who haven't been vaxxed, not to mention people whose parents simply never got them vaxxed due to cost or hassle.

Plus, there are large immigrant communities in places like NCY who come from countries where vaxxing against Polio has been disrupted by things like war or poverty.

so the polio vaccine I got as a kid is no longer working. What about the small pox? What about the dozens of shots I got in the military? Jesus Christ, we are all going to die, aren't we?

Oh, I'm so scared now, it used to be Germans we had to worry about, now it's just germs! ARRGggggggggggggggg!!!!!

If you'd watch the Whitehouse press briefings you'd know that a vax is considered to be effective when it provides over over around 85 percent protection, which is around where the decades old measles and chickenpox vaxes are. You'd also know that the effectiveness increases again if you are infected, shortening the time and the severity of the infection. Potentially to the level that you're asymptomatic.

I don't have access to your vaccination details, so you may be 60-80 percent protected, or less for some things. The shots that you got in the military might require boosters, depending on how long ago they were.

That makes sense. So when something like an mRNA experimental drug that people like to call a "vaccine" has a negative efficacy, then it doesn't work too well, huh?

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: TheLieWeLive
a reply to: Narvasis

Funny how all these diseases are resurfacing and spreading just after a pushed vaccination worldwide.

It's not sudden or unexpected, it's been predicted for quite a while now due to disruption in vax programs in Africa and the middle east due to war and groups like the Taliban. It's endemic in a lot of places where the US gets a lot of immigrants from.

Take Afghanistan, the polio campaign there has been significantly disrupted, and there are thousands of new Afghani refugees coming in.

Funny how the pandemic skipped the unvaccinated continent of Africa, but the highest vaccinated countries like South Korea experienced a record number of deaths this year. Seems like its working amazingly well.

This is actually pretty much what you'd expect. Countries like South Korea and Japan have always had a problem with communicable diseases because they have densely packed populations, many multigenerational households, and are dependant on mass transit.

It's why NCY was hit hard early one. As was London in England. Same basic problems. Lots of lower to middle income people crammed into small apartments, who ride the metro daily.

South Korea also has a culture of showing up even if you're sick which didn't help.

Africa, on the other hand, people simply died by the thousand and it wasn't properly recorded. Especially among the elderly.

Do you think that it's a coincidence that countries like South Africa, which have better reporting systems, recorded more deaths?

The way I always understood it was that enough of us were vaccinated that herd immunity protected us. This was pre covid and even years ago we were being told that a lack of people being vaccinated could cause issues with that.

So for me there has not been any change, the same information as before. I don’t think any vaccination is guaranteed to stop you catching something but it gives your body a head start. if you continue to get exposed to something then in the end you may succumb to it as it’s mainly dependent on how robust your immune system is.

In the UK we have apparently not been too concerned that many new arrivals are not vaccinated against the numerous things we have taken for granted had all but been eradicated. Many counties require full vaccinations in order to move there, to protect their citizens. Seems our government doesn’t really care.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: Narvasis

I am a bit confused by this one. Most of us are vaxxed against Polio. And back then, in the before the definition of a "vaccine" had been changed time, we were supposed to be immune to Polio because of the vaccine. So if you are vaxxed already, you have no worries. What kind of numbers are we talking about for unvaxxed people in the US with regard to Polio?

The vax isn't 100 percent effective, and there are a fair few anti-vaxxers who haven't been vaxxed, not to mention people whose parents simply never got them vaxxed due to cost or hassle.

Plus, there are large immigrant communities in places like NCY who come from countries where vaxxing against Polio has been disrupted by things like war or poverty.

so the polio vaccine I got as a kid is no longer working. What about the small pox? What about the dozens of shots I got in the military? Jesus Christ, we are all going to die, aren't we?

Oh, I'm so scared now, it used to be Germans we had to worry about, now it's just germs! ARRGggggggggggggggg!!!!!

If you'd watch the Whitehouse press briefings you'd know that a vax is considered to be effective when it provides over over around 85 percent protection, which is around where the decades old measles and chickenpox vaxes are. You'd also know that the effectiveness increases again if you are infected, shortening the time and the severity of the infection. Potentially to the level that you're asymptomatic.

I don't have access to your vaccination details, so you may be 60-80 percent protected, or less for some things. The shots that you got in the military might require boosters, depending on how long ago they were.

That makes sense. So when something like an mRNA experimental drug that people like to call a "vaccine" has a negative efficacy, then it doesn't work too well, huh?

It's telling that you've never actually been able to provide a source to support that claim. I've asked and asked, but you keep changing the subject.

It's almost as if ... you don't have any evidence?

Like that BA pilot that you said died due to altitude and the vac, and it turned out that the guy had a mountain biking accident. Remember that?

Toxins and polio vaccines can cause polio like disease ..


Vaccine-Derived Polio Is Found in London’s Sewage and Their Solution is to Inject People with More Vaccines


I really would not rush to go get polio vaccine .

a reply to: burntheships

well, there's that + thing and it doesn't stand for a 8.99 subscription fee.