Father Whose Son Developed Myocarditis Gets Pharmacist to Admit They're Omitting the Truth

originally posted by: 1947boomer
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

From:

covid19.nih.gov...

This is absolute bs imo. I have heard of zero people developing a heart issue while sick with covid or shortly after having Covid. Yet I have heard literally dozens of cases of people developing heart issues shortly after the vaccine. And lets just assume this risk analysis is somehow correct, getting the vaccine will still add on some extra chance of developing myocarditis, because as the data clearly shows, the vaccine will not prevent a covid infection.

Also notice how the image says "chance of having myocarditis if hospitalized from Covid-19", as we know most people have very mild symptoms, and those who are hospitalized tend to have weak immune systems or they have a pre-existing health condition. What do you think the stats for "Chance of having myocarditis if hospitalized for any virus or disease" would be? Because I strongly suspect it would be similar to 226 per 100K, if not higher.

Also, the father is very correct when he says there is virtually no risk of a healthy kid dying from Covid, there are several other common viruses which kill hundreds of healthy children each year, some of which we have no vaccine for. Covid has killed such an extremely small number of healthy kids it might as well not even exist as far as kids are concerned. And yet we have delusional morons pushing it on kids without telling them the risk, and they deserve every bit of anger directed at them.

originally posted by: continuousThunder

no, i was not comparing a burger order to a man's child. I was comparing the degree of responsibility a single pharmacist shares in a global vaccine initiative to that a drive thru girl shares in last week's dinner order, and i chose that particular example because i'm sure we've all seen entitled bullies going off at harassed fast food staff who deserve none of their ire but can't get away/ Reading comprehension, isn't it great?

Sorry, but ignorance is not an excuse in this situation. Just like ignorance of the law is not an excuse. When it comes to the health of every single person on the planet, it's a very serious situation, and those people who inject the vaccine are just as responsible as the people who developed the vaccines and the politicians promoting it. They all play a necessary role, and they all share blame for every single person who dies as a result of their negligence and refusal to seriously examine side-effects. The father even asked her if she would warn parents about myocarditis in the future, and she said that she couldn't answer his question. Seeing children be brought into this political conflict is so painful to watch and I deeply despise anyone involved, whether they claim ignorance or not.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Wow , Pharmacist admit to just follow orders , even if it means that people health is ruined


This is major problem is health related jobs, too many are order followers, because of just being stubid or because fearing loosing job. The system is set up to target anyone who disagrees the system....doctors can loose license etc.


And the system itself, is protecting the other system from up ....and so on...pyramid .

Poor kid

The Elite Drug Pushers will stand in the Shadows while the Foot Soldiers are tracked down and Harshly Dealt with.

AUSTRALIA Grieving Man Tracks Down Dr Who Gave His Family Member The C-19 Vaccine

brandnewtube.com...

Moral of the story: do NOT covid vaccine your own kids!

:stop:

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

It's well documented, 1 in 5,000 men under the age of 35 will experience mild symptoms and 1in 50,000 will experience more serious symptoms. It's no secret.

a reply to: ChaoticOrder

Also, the father is very correct when he says there is virtually no risk of a healthy kid dying from Covid,

As was said during the press briefings, they're not vaxxing the kids because the kids are at risk, they're vaxxing the kids to reduce community transmission to people who are at risk.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

As was said during the press briefings, they're not vaxxing the kids because the kids are at risk, they're vaxxing the kids to reduce community transmission to people who are at risk.

And you're posting this because you defend that excuse I mean policy?

a reply to: AaarghZombies

Except the vaccine does not prevent transmission, if anything the data strongly suggests that Covid spreads more easily the more vaccinated a community is. Even if it did work the way you say, protecting the old at the expense of the young is pathetic.

a reply to: ChaoticOrder

Except the vaccine does not prevent transmission, if anything the data strongly suggests that Covid spreads more easily the more vaccinated a community is. Even if it did work the way you say, protecting the old at the expense of the young is pathetic.

For the forever X infinitiefth time.

a reply to: Randyvine2

I post because it's public knowledge, and if you can't tell the difference between explaining and condoning then maybe a conspiracy forum isn't the best place for you to hang out.

My past posting history is public, it debunks your allegations

a reply to: Randyvine2

Evidence for literally any of that?

Links in my signature debunk you.

originally posted by: ChaoticOrder
a reply to: AaarghZombies

Except the vaccine does not prevent transmission, if anything the data strongly suggests that Covid spreads more easily the more vaccinated a community is. Even if it did work the way you say, protecting the old at the expense of the young is pathetic.

Congratulations you've debunked yourself.

Evidence that vulnerable people are more likely to get vaxxed doesn't prove that the vaxxed are more vulnerable.

Doesn't anybody understand stats any more?

a reply to: AaarghZombies

Hey thanks for the advice. And I don't remember you debunking
anything. Unless you think avoiding a direct question is debunking
something.

Do you think it's okay to disinform and deflect on conspiracy sites?

a reply to: AaarghZombies

As was said during the press briefings, they're not vaxxing the kids because the kids are at risk, they're vaxxing the kids to reduce community transmission to people who are at risk.

Try again

What does this have to do with pharmacies not informing people
of the un necessary danger to a child?

And do you defend this policy?

You have to try really hard to get smart with me Mkay?

a reply to: Randyvine2

You do realize that parents are given a leaflet explaining the dangers of the vax, including possible side effects, and that pharmacy have signs up telling people how they can get this information online or in store, and that they will tell you if you ask?

If people choose not to read this publicly available information that's practically jammed down your throat,
then more fool them.

You can take a horse to water but you can't stop it from beating its head against a rock.

Both fox and cnn have gone over this a million times, if the father was ignorant then its because he chose to be.

I even have a link in my signature to an extremely good study from Israel in which the potential harm from the vax is discussed in depth. So you personally have no excuse for not knowing or grounds for saying that this is being covered up.

And I see that you were unable to find a thread in which I supposedly defended this policy, but given you views on gun grabbing I guess it is not surprising.

No vaxes in arms, no guns in civilian hands, you and Brandon should get married or something.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: Randyvine2

You do realize that parents are given a leaflet explaining the dangers of the vax, including possible side effects, and that pharmacy have signs up telling people how they can get this information online or in store, and that they will tell you if you ask?

If people choose not to read this publicly available information that's practically jammed down your throat,
then more fool them.

You can take a horse to water but you can't stop it from beating its head against a rock.

Both fox and cnn have gone over this a million times, if the father was ignorant then its because he chose to be.

I even have a link in my signature to an extremely good study from Israel in which the potential harm from the vax is discussed in depth. So you personally have no excuse for not knowing or grounds for saying that this is being covered up.

And I see that you were unable to find a thread in which I supposedly defended this policy, but given you views on gun grabbing I guess it is not surprising.

No vaxes in arms, no guns in civilian hands, you and Brandon should get married or something.

there you have it folks. this jab could kill you or give you myocarditis. Best think long and hard if you want to risk that.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0


What on Earth do you mean by "sometimes the truth sneaks out"?

Myocarditis Was identified as one of the main side effects in young people very early on.. We were all told this many times... It's not a secret... It's just VERY rare, and even more likely if you contract Covid..

Antoher laughable post from you....

In one thread you go on about the 9 pages of side effects published by Pfizer, then in this thread you say that "they are hiding the side effects" ... Which is it?? Both can't be true?

No side-effects were hidden, in fact quite the opposite... The 9 pages released were taken by you and your ilk as meaning this is what will happen to you..

Another case of misinterpretation of the data and a lack of understanding of the science... Bit of a pattern forming there..

Your narative is falling apart mate...

PA

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Can't...some are too busy cranking their necks toward the sky that they trip.