Tulsi Gabbard Torches Biden Administration for "Dangerously promoting child abuse"

I'm not a big fan of Tulsi, but sometimes she hits the mark, like in this statement...

“The FDA made a disturbing, but not at all surprising announcement just a few days ago about children’s health,” Gabbard declared. “Now, if you haven’t heard about it, or, if you missed it, it is because the mainstream media and the Biden-Harris administration have been completely silent on it, and this warning that the FDA issued was basically saying that puberty blockers can cause serious health risks for our kids.

Unfortunately, at almost the exact same time the FDA issued this warning, Biden-Harris administration officials were making public statements actively promoting the use of puberty blockers and irreversible surgeries for kids.”

“Now, let’s be clear: this administration is dangerously promoting child abuse,” she blasted.

The video can be seen here and here.

To be fair, this isn't exactly out of character for our government as a whole, but the far left neo-marxists have taken their hatred for all things moderate or conservative to increasingly new levels of insanity. They sincerely mean it when they say "build back better" because they seem to be hell-bent on destroying it all, so they can start over from scratch.

a reply to: Klassified

Each time she appears on Tucker Carlson, she makes a helluva lot of sense...especially for a Democrat.

a reply to: Klassified

She isn't wrong, and usually does make a lot of sense. If she adjusted her thoughts on gun control, there would be very little of her platform that's consistent with democratic values.

a reply to: Klassified
How on earth can Tulsi remain in the democrat party if she is not totally on board the soft cultural revolution/year zero agenda of the party?

She seems to retain common sense on certain matters-how the heck was she allowed to be a democrat?
I thought common sense was not allowed in that party.

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: Klassified

She isn't wrong, and usually does make a lot of sense. If she adjusted her thoughts on gun control, there would be very little of her platform that's consistent with democratic values.

That's the main issue I have with her. Otherwise, she is at least in the ballpark.

We will be better off as a country when we value competency over party platform, it's how we ended up with Biden and Harris. We can call the Democrats stupid for doing this, but scoffing at Gabbard because she has a different opinion on gun control alone?

I'd rather have Gabbard as President than Biden or Harris bottom line, pretty sure Gabbard wasn't pushed by the DNC because she is above letting special interest push her buttons, and would likely be able to navigate today's socio-political climate better than anyone else the DNC is gonna throw out there.

Off the cuff thought, wouldn't it be better if the DNC is actually rigging the elections and the WEF and NWO are running rampant if we had the one candidate that seems less influenced and definitely out of favor with DNC leaders and special interest?

I'll go further I wouldn't mind her being the first woman President either, her military career wasn't just fluff, she didn't join the military to make it look good for a political resume. It's all about who is the most competent and has the best chance of getting elected.

I prefer DeSantis myself, but I question if he is electable. Like to pretend he is, but even in a fair and honest election, it's far from certain. ergo Id take Gabbard over Gavin, Biden, Harris, Buttigieg, Hilliary, or Chelsea LOL, somebody actually posted that somewhere the other day.

a reply to: putnam6
I have no allegiance to any party, but a vote for Tulsi is a vote against the 2nd amendment.

a reply to: Klassified
I used to want to like Tulsi Gabbard, but ever since I saw her along with Dan Crenshaw as a WEF young leader… I don’t trust her motivation for anything that she says. Kinda like FOX news
mobile.twitter.com...

a reply to: Klassified

Her politics aside, she makes a good point.

The Biden administration is promoting child abuse.

Since they promote child trafficking with their open borders, I'm not surprized.

originally posted by: Klassified
a reply to: putnam6
I have no allegiance to any party, but a vote for Tulsi is a vote against the 2nd amendment.

I apologize I can get wordy sometimes when your being direct/simple is much better

Let's pose it this way if we are gonna have to have a Democratic President? then who in the hell would you prefer?

It's that damn simple, and I'll go a bit further for emphasis. Who did you think was going to win the 2020 Presidential election?

Again I prefer DeSantis and would likely prefer most Republican candidates over Gabbard, but after DeSantis who from the Republican side has a ghost of a chance? seriously? It's 2 guys and you know it, it's DeSantis and Trump. I don't think either one of them is anywhere close to a lock. As for the WEF or NWO dogma, because that's what this is, it's dogma. Wouldn't it be a simple logical conclusion that nefarious worldwide organizations would cast a wide net, as well as politicians, are often forced to be on the periphery of such organizations and associations just to add to their resume at the time their joining was probably beneficial, I mean damn she isn't anywhere close to Justin Trudeau or Gavin Newsome, I have no doubt Gabbard damn sure cares more about her country and it's people than the both of those yahoos

Regardless who the republican candidate is, he should pick Tulsi for VP.

Heads would explode!

And I would lmao on the floor rolling.

a reply to: Silcone Synapse

I think it's because where she lives there is no Republican party to speak of. I have never trusted her.

a reply to: Klassified

Tulsa playing for points. She must know the puberty blockers and trans stuff is all about sterilizing kids. It's about population conntrol.

a reply to: Klassified

I really want to support Tulsi, but then I remind myself that underneath it all, she's really just a sane democrat. I wouldn't mind the party leaving her behind like the left Jim Webb, but I'd still be iffy. I will say, however, that she has been making a lot of sense out of things since the democrats went beyond retard after the election. She's also one of only two democrats who are easy on the eyes. Jessica Tarlov is the other one.

a reply to: putnam6

Let's pose it this way if we are gonna have to have a Democratic President? then who in the hell would you prefer?

It's a good question. Right now, I can't think of anyone. Since Biden took office, even the "blue dog coalition", which is a group of the most moderate democrats in the house, have voted with Biden more than not.

Who did you think was going to win the 2020 Presidential election?

Admittedly, I expected Trump would win.

but after DeSantis who from the Republican side has a ghost of a chance?

Kristi Noem, but she's not a sure bet either.

I have no doubt Gabbard damn sure cares more about her country and it's people than the both of those yahoos

I'll give her credit, at least she's consistent and talks like she has a modicum of sense in her head.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: Klassified

Each time she appears on Tucker Carlson, she makes a helluva lot of sense...especially for a Democrat.

How about that, democrats aren't the problem, extremism is. Hardcore progressives just wrap their radical ideology in a convenient social justice banner. Exploitation doesn't always mean the virtue is hollow but there's always a surplus of idiots who can't resist ruining a halfway decent business.

a reply to: DBCowboy

Remember back when we were young and cute, Cowboy?
And the quaint but somewhat soothing tradition was to install
the losing candidate for President as the Vice?
In deference to the public loggerheads of that wise pair long
ago: political parties nowdays would probably run out of ammo
faster than Chris Rock. PS I didn't kill the bank either.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
Regardless who the republican candidate is, he should pick Tulsi for VP.

Heads would explode!

And I would lmao on the floor rolling.

I would be really cool, and it's not a bad idea who else would be a more influential vote pull for say Ron DeSantis? more women check, more minorities check, national recognition check, stick it to the Democrats triple check.

a reply to: derfreebie

Remember back when we were young and cute, Cowboy?

Pics or it never happened.

originally posted by: Klassified
a reply to: putnam6

Let's pose it this way if we are gonna have to have a Democratic President? then who in the hell would you prefer?

It's a good question. Right now, I can't think of anyone. Since Biden took office, even the "blue dog coalition", which is a group of the most moderate democrats in the house, have voted with Biden more than not.

Who did you think was going to win the 2020 Presidential election?

Admittedly, I expected Trump would win.

but after DeSantis who from the Republican side has a ghost of a chance?

Kristi Noem, but she's not a sure bet either.

I have no doubt Gabbard damn sure cares more about her country and it's people than the both of those yahoos

I'll give her credit, at least she's consistent and talks like she has a modicum of sense in her head.

Good point about Kristi Noem, forgot all about her.