Over fourty percent women suffer problems after jab

originally posted by: Itisnowagain

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: AaarghZombies
Doesn't matter......that was not what you were disputing.

My response was relating to the source used by the OP, which claimed that 40 percent of women were effected.

It's true isn't it?

It's true that around 42 percent of women self reported changes in their cycle, it's also true that these women include people who took the JJ and AstraZeneca vax. Which isn't mRNA based.

Where did you read that it was JJ and Astrazeneca?

Did you read about the study that I suggested?
Because it say this:

Most participants had received either the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines.

Yes, "most" did have those two vax, but the study also included about 4,000 women who had non mRNA vax. Which isn't an insignificant number of people.

Pfizer:21,620
Moderna: 13,001
AstraZeneca 751
JJ: 3469

This is the reason the trials did not allow pregnant women to participate.

originally posted by: litterbaux
a reply to: SybiLulu

This thread is specifcally calling out the "jab". Having natural exposure to Covid would not impact the validity of the thread. It's just more misdirection.

I see you didn't bother to read the article. Here it is again. Why don't you read the information presented before trying to argue against it??

Welcome to Gileand

So does it matter that some good guys in a Swedish university (that are experts in the field and have been producing papers on this stuff for years, by the way) published a paper showing that the nasty Ecohealth77(™) virus (aka SARS2, COVID, Wuhan-1 and a few other choice names) produced proteins that - if they hung around long enough - would stop your cells’ protection mechanism against cancer? Well, no - provided that the stuff (the protein it makes) didn’t hang around long, didn’t get into the nucleus, and didn’t get to the ovaries. Fortunately, if you get infected with said virus and your immune system is working the spike protein should be rapidly neutralised and so you shouldn’t be at risk of these cancers from a “COVID-19” infection.

But… What you really, really don’t want in this scenario is

(1) the spike protein in the vicinity of the nucleus, where the DNA repair happens
(2) the spike protein to be continually produced
(3) a full length spike artificial protein matching the viral spike, because we don’t know which bit of the spike protein is causing this effect.

Well, guess what?

It just so happens that there is a genetic therapy currently in production that
(1) induces spike protein to be produced in and around the cell nucleus
(2) is produced for at least 60 days and almost certainly longer
(3) produces the full length spike exactly matching (amino acid for amino acid1) the full length of the viral spike protein