Over fourty percent women suffer problems after jab

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

He said he knew many women with problems after the shot, Mabey your programming needs a tweak.

a reply to: Hecate666

Jab means

to push or hit something forcefully and quickly

dictionary.cambridge.org...

Inject means

to use a needle and syringe (= small tube) to put a liquid such as a drug into a person's body

dictionary.cambridge.org...

The word jab has been popularised to draw attention away from the actual process taking place.

a reply to: ussmidway

I call it the posion shot myself. Out loud, in public and so as many people as possible can hear me.

originally posted by: worldstarcountry
a reply to: ussmidway

I call it the posion shot myself. Out loud, in public and so as many people as possible can hear me.

I do similar,call it " taken the poison" when talking about it.
I was pleasantly surprised when I started a new job in March that most people there hadn't taken the poison.
The government and MSM propaganda hadn't worked as well as I feared and most had seen right through the whole fake pandemic narrative.

originally posted by: Kester
a reply to: Hecate666

Jab means

to push or hit something forcefully and quickly

dictionary.cambridge.org...

Inject means

to use a needle and syringe (= small tube) to put a liquid such as a drug into a person's body

dictionary.cambridge.org...

The word jab has been popularised to draw attention away from the actual process taking place.

No, here in Britain we had flu jabs for decades. It may be to take people's fear of needles away but it could also be because it's nice and short. Whatever the reason, it is handy to use for this mrna injection to avoid deletion of comments in certain places. Once jab becomes a flag word, we'll use something else.

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: ChiefD

You know fact check is a fake site that was founded by CNN reporter, they are an arm of CNN, rabid dogs pushing agendas.

Taking into consideration that Pfizer money is imbedded into anything CNN news does, fact check can not be trusted.

Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

He said he knew many women with problems after the shot, Mabey your programming needs a tweak.

And yet he has produced no verifiable data, nor has he passed peer review.

Data without scrutiny is just hearsay.

a reply to: AaarghZombies
Go to google and search:
COVID vaccines are linked to heavier periods for many – new findings from large study
Gabriella Kountourides, University of Oxford
Published: July 18, 2022 1.20pm BST

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: AaarghZombies
Go to google and search:
COVID vaccines are linked to heavier periods for many – new findings from large study
Gabriella Kountourides, University of Oxford
Published: July 18, 2022 1.20pm BST

Didn't this turn out to be due to changes in levels of cortisol?

Which, in case you didn't know, is a stress hormone.

Or, to put it another way, women were stressed out about the vax and this effected their cycle.

I wonder why women might be stressed about the vax?

a reply to: AaarghZombies

Did you read it?

We don’t yet fully understand the biological mechanism behind cycle changes linked to COVID vaccines. But changes to menstrual cycles usually stem from one of two routes: hormones or inflammation. A vaccine works by provoking the immune system to react to exposure to a disease, which can influence inflammation.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: AaarghZombies

Did you read it?

My response was relating to the source used by the OP, which claimed that 40 percent of women were effected.

a reply to: AaarghZombies
Did you read it?

"Meanwhile, many people have reported changes to their menstrual cycles after COVID vaccination. The largest study yet on this topic has just been published, finding that 42% of people who regularly menstruate reported a heavier period after COVID vaccination."

originally posted by: ChiefD
Looking at the YouTube video, looks like your source is TrialSite News. I looked them up. Lo and behold, they are not a legitimate news site. mediabiasfactcheck.com... It's always good to fact check before posting stuff like this.

I did my own checking, to see if you are a legitimate news source.

Overall, we rate Above Top Secret a Right Biased Strong Conspiracy website and discussion forum based on the promotion of unproven or debunked claims.

ATS mediabias

Lo and behold, you are a right wing news source that promotes debunked claims. Nice try, Ultra-MAGA, trying to act like Trump's vaccines aren't documented to cause massive issues with menstruation. Shame on you for defending Trump's ongoing attacks on women's reproductive rights!

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: AaarghZombies
Did you read it?

"Meanwhile, many people have reported changes to their menstrual cycles after COVID vaccination. The largest study yet on this topic has just been published, finding that 42% of people who regularly menstruate reported a heavier period after COVID vaccination."

You may have missed these bits

Reports of cycle changes after vaccination is not a new phenomenon. A 1913 study showed heavier bleeding after typhoid vaccination. Similarly, a 1982 study on hepatitis B and a more recent one on HPV found changes to menstrual cycles following vaccination.

a reply to: AaarghZombies
Doesn't matter......that was not what you were disputing.

My response was relating to the source used by the OP, which claimed that 40 percent of women were effected.

It's true isn't it?

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: AaarghZombies
Doesn't matter......that was not what you were disputing.

My response was relating to the source used by the OP, which claimed that 40 percent of women were effected.

It's true isn't it?

It matters because I'm disputing the conclusion that the OP's source reaches, and the methods that they use to reach that conclusion.

It's true that around 42 percent of women self reported changes in their cycle, it's also true that these women include people who took the JJ and AstraZeneca vax. Which isn't mRNA based.

It's also true that other vax have been reported as causing changes to a woman's cycle, and that stress is likely a factor.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: AaarghZombies
Doesn't matter......that was not what you were disputing.

My response was relating to the source used by the OP, which claimed that 40 percent of women were effected.

It's true isn't it?

The 40% has been known for a while. They know it.

They're all in a tizzy here so they can ignore the two threads showing that the vaccine is killing kids. Somehow they're so deeply in denial the only available option to them is to continue being wrong, just not in a dead kids thread.

Can you imagine that?

The only way it can get worse is if they start saying maybe some kids do need to die, that's the next rung on the ladder of degeneracy I guess.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: AaarghZombies
Doesn't matter......that was not what you were disputing.

My response was relating to the source used by the OP, which claimed that 40 percent of women were effected.

It's true isn't it?

It's true that around 42 percent of women self reported changes in their cycle, it's also true that these women include people who took the JJ and AstraZeneca vax. Which isn't mRNA based.

Where did you read that it was JJ and Astrazeneca?

Did you read about the study that I suggested?
Because it say this:

Most participants had received either the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

Stress is just an absurd excuse given to dismiss the thousands and thousands of reports woman were making, kind of like "myocarditis is mild" and "we're not in a recession because we changed the definition."

Woman in menopause were suddenly having periods again and other such anomalies that cannot be explained by stress. The reports by woman were so overwintering that it prompted a panicked response by health officials to reluctantly announce that they would study it. Something they should have done before they crammed these down everyone's throat.

Now we have evidence of fraud and a crime to withold data. Let's begin:

Welcome To Gilead

TextTLDR: A paper was published in October showing how the mRNA vaccines could massively impact ovarian and breast cancer risk. Two scientists linked to the NIH and Pharma conspired to remove it from publication - putting a generation of women at risk.

It involves the discovery late last year that a generation of women exposed to the SARS-CoV2 spike protein could be at significant risk of ovarian & breast cancer - and two bearded PhDs in influential positions went out of their way to make sure that information was buried. Because, who cares about women when you are trying to save the world, right?

The links to the two studies that prove this thesis and exactly who and how the papers got buried under scientific poppycock is in the article.


It not enough to simply read the studies, you actually have to participate or listen to the debates and the fine details of how corruption is playing out in the peer review process and all throughout academia.

a reply to: SybiLulu

This thread is specifcally calling out the "jab". Having natural exposure to Covid would not impact the validity of the thread. It's just more misdirection.