It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: JAGStorm
I'll take my job responsibilities over that type of existence any day.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: JAGStorm
I know most of my neighbors and happen to be friends with many. I'm not seeing why it would be necessary to revert to a more labor intensive subsistence lifestyle to be 'happier'. As a matter of fact, I think it would make most people unhappier.
originally posted by: JAGStorm
Think of it like gardening.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: JAGStorm
Think of it like gardening.
Growing some peas and growing/hunting enough food for your subsistence is much more labor intensive for the latter. The reason the United States became such a huge world economy was due to how we were able to provide products like beef, sugar, beer, bread, pork and vegetables. We not only supplied domestic need in abundance but we were able to supply the global market as well beginning in the mid-1800's and it wasn't via subsistence living.
originally posted by: JAGStorm
Even the moms doing loads of laundry by hand and making every meal from scratch. You would think they would be the ones that wanted to go back to modern luxuries the soonest, but you’d be wrong.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: JAGStorm
Even the moms doing loads of laundry by hand and making every meal from scratch. You would think they would be the ones that wanted to go back to modern luxuries the soonest, but you’d be wrong.
My mother came from a town, that when we visited in the 1980's, still washed their clothes in a communal fountain. She isn't going back to that ever, trust me.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: JAGStorm
And there are still people pining for the Soviet Union because they liked the structure and order it imposed but I'd wager the bulk of the people who grew up under that are shedding tears for the 'good old days'.
originally posted by: JAGStorm
1900 island people were as free as it gets.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: JAGStorm
1900 island people were as free as it gets.
They are as free as their obligations to providing everything for themselves requires. I'd ask how much time off they get but I think I already know the answer, a few decades off their lifespan.
originally posted by: JAGStorm
When the waves were too high they can’t fish, when storms come in they can’t fish.
I just read something that said that modern US workers work longer and more than almost any time in history.
originally posted by: JAGStorm
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: JAGStorm
Even the moms doing loads of laundry by hand and making every meal from scratch. You would think they would be the ones that wanted to go back to modern luxuries the soonest, but you’d be wrong.
My mother came from a town, that when we visited in the 1980's, still washed their clothes in a communal fountain. She isn't going back to that ever, trust me.
I’m not saying every single person alive would be happier in that environment. We’ve obviously advanced because we wanted things to be easier. What this show highlighted is that for some, maybe a lot, easier is not always better.
Maybe the struggle in some things equated to happiness
So like a fishing village if I was with the right crowd I'd probably enjoy it immensely. I could definitely see lots of people enjoying the simplicity of it all. Of course, it's not for everybody. Was this the same show that did like an 1800s prairie settlers a few years back? IIRC correctly they had young and teen kids who didn't adapt as well as their parents did.
originally posted by: JAGStorm
a reply to: putnam6
So like a fishing village if I was with the right crowd I'd probably enjoy it immensely. I could definitely see lots of people enjoying the simplicity of it all. Of course, it's not for everybody. Was this the same show that did like an 1800s prairie settlers a few years back? IIRC correctly they had young and teen kids who didn't adapt as well as their parents did.
I don’t think it’s the same production but similar in set up.
There were two teen girls on this show and they had a hard time at first but caught on.
The little kids seemed to do really well and enjoyed it with the exception of hunger.
I think they did this for one month. You could actually tell some of the women lost quite a bit of weight, so I believe they were truly reenacting it.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: JAGStorm
1900 island people were as free as it gets.
They are as free as their obligations to providing everything for themselves requires. I'd ask how much time off they get but I think I already know the answer, a few decades off their lifespan.