posted on Jul, 13 2022 @ 09:32 PM
The concept of
"boomerang
money" is my opinion on where all of this foreign aid goes.
The idea being, the money is shipped abroad, with the stated attention of helping the people of say, Ukraine, or Haiti, or pick your 3rd world country
that also happens to have entrenched U.S. "philanthropy" and "aid" organizations there.
Then, on foreign soil, the aid money sent there from the U.S., ends up paying for goods and services of American interests that happen to be there. I
use the term 'goods and services' loosely, for instance, the valuable insight Hunter Biden was handsomely compensated for on the board of a Ukrainian
gas company, despite Hunter Biden not speaking the language t knowing the first FKING thing about drilling or plumbing the depths except in the area
of .... well, you know.
Lest we think this is strictly one side in the U.S. doing it, I heard tell that Willard Romney has family ties set up in the Ukraine too, so there may
be multiple "Big Guys" operating there.
In any case, the money we p1ss away abroad, it would be interesting to gauge how much actually 'trickles down' to the real people that need it there.
I guess BOTH political parties have their own version of 'trickle down economics', hmmm.
I seem to remember an orange hued fellow that had a problem with how much money U.S. coffers supplied around the globe. That was right around the
time fake peeing hooker and fraud FISA warrants and fairy tale dossiers started making their rounds. I don't think the legally sanctioned money
launderers in our government liked the idea of turning off the 'aid and philanthropy' faucet, a.k.a. "boomerang money"