Tartaria the first Reset conspiracy?

a reply to: Terpene

Yeah ok... 2h in and he has gone of the rails, into electromagnetic land. I dont think he's coming back to a simpler explanation. Man 3 hours to go, what a torture

a reply to: NobodySpecial268

Another component that might be explained with a catastrophic resonance incident is the orphans. Resonance will have a much stronger effect on rigid bone structures of adults, compared to the more flexible kids bones, their bones being flexible serve as dampers.
Imagine what mechanical resonance could do in a cavity like the skull...
Mixing that flatearth into it almost seems like a deliberate move, to discredit it.

a reply to: Terpene

"Resonance" is an interesting phenomenon. In Christchurch New Zealand they had the big quake a few years ago, lots of liquefaction over there.

Ewar did get a lot of flak over the original documentary (posted above), got hounded off youtube and went to telegram.

I watched it over a month, a chapter at a time and sometimes just left it playing on the computer as background noise. So I reckon your brave Terpene : )

It is worth it though.

originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: NobodySpecial268

Another component that might be explained with a catastrophic resonance incident is the orphans. Resonance will have a much stronger effect on rigid bone structures of adults, compared to the more flexible kids bones, their bones being flexible serve as dampers.
Imagine what mechanical resonance could do in a cavity like the skull...
Mixing that flatearth into it almost seems like a deliberate move, to discredit it.

Yeah the disappearance of adults and appearance of lots of orphans got my attention too.

The other thing that got my attention is the part about the buildings being cavity resonators and powering an electrical grid. Specifically; if there were mercury based generators, where did the machines go? And where is all the mercury?

If you got up to the part about how Ewar says the electrical apparartus based on the bar magnet will only work if the earth is flat and not round, well you got me thinking about that today when you said this:

Mixing that flatearth into it almost seems like a deliberate move, to discredit it.

Well, I think you're right there Terpene. Maybe Ewar didn't want to straight out say something important.

If we think in the helio-centric model, where the earth orbits the sun, it is all flat-earth BS.
If we think in the geo-centric model, where the sun and planets orbit the earth, it can make a lot more sense.

I think Ewar is saying: watch the video in the geo-centric view, and not in the helio-centric view.

I'm not saying the earth is flat here.

So if the mecury accumulators(?) generators(?) only work in the flat earth model, how do we reconcile this with the round earth model?

The architecture with the resonators and mercury accumulators are the visible system on the surface of the earth. We can create the equivalent of the flat earth for the complete system. We just have to place a layer underground.

There are stories of world wide tunnel systems.

As above so below . . . .

ETA: If the architecture has been "repurposed", then it follows the underground "sewer" systems under the old cities may be repurposed too.

If the tunnels were full of water, the moon's gravity would have tidal effects in the waters of the tunnels.

a reply to: NobodySpecial268

He lost me when he tried to say nasa is hiding the poles of other Planets, when there are no other Planets? Or is he implying that earth is also just a sono luminescent blop.

Honestly i see many of the things he describes working on a globe just fine...

a reply to: Terpene

Yeah, I don't get parts of it either. The map thing on the moon is one of those things I ignore.

a reply to: NobodySpecial268

I have an hour to go, but I'm afraid he's going to wrap it up, with his own religious bias. some interesting points indeed, why some of his theories wouldn't work on a globe still eludes me. I was a little derogatory before when mentioning electromagnetism, I think it might hold answers to many unanswered questions and phenomenons we encounter.

a reply to: Terpene

I just took it as read that when he mentioned the electromagnets needed a flat earth, maybe it does. I am no electrical engineer.

The "flat earth vs round earth" is always a no-brainer as to who is going to win that arguement. Yet if we think in terms of helio-centric and geo-centric as two legitimate views, we can get places.

In bio-dynamic agriculture the planting and cultivation goes by a geo-centric calendar. There is a book I read fourty years ago called Planetary Influences Upon Plants by Ernst Michael Kranich (kindle has it on Amazon). That book takes the geo-centric position and describes how the planets move in the sky as viewed from the earth. For example, Venus scibes a pentagram around the sun in it's annual movements as the evening and morning stars.

We forget that there are different ways to view things.

As you say Terpene; "some interesting points indeed".

i just discovered all this tar-taria stuff.

i have lived and explored new york city my whole life.
i have seen these sunken buildings.

i went to art school in nyc, graduated.
we have to study architecture.

one thing you do not do, you do not 'build' faake windows to put under mudd and cement, bury them, and then put more windows and arches on top of them.

i have seen these sunken windows everywhere.

i alao explore massive architecture.
and yes, anytime they build new stuff, its square steel and glass.

but how come the vic-torian era architecture is beyond spectacular?

the only 'induglgent' architecture i see being built in the u-s-a is in las vegas, disneyworld, or universal studios lol.
everything else being built is squre garbage.