Debunking teh Space Universe

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Rofl. AugustusMasonicus, can you go get a box of plugsparks for me.

a reply to: oddscreenname

Based on what?

originally posted by: MkayUltra
Rofl. AugustusMasonicus, can you go get a box of plugsparks for me.

Are they for the douchestributor in your caravan?

a reply to: MkayUltra

Oh, no, it's simply based. Based AF, actually

No mention of my supergluieun hypothesis. It must be the correct answer then.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

He might already sport an electronic idiognition system, consider this factor too.

a reply to: oddscreenname

What is your formula? Thank you.

a reply to: TDDAgain

I love how you keep talking like you have a clue. How about admitting that you dont even know the basics.

originally posted by: TDDAgain
He might already sport an electronic idiognition system, consider this factor too.

Possibly, all I know is the crapometer is revving at the redline.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Rofl. I love how you think your "clout" is going to make the physics beating go away.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

You disagree with your peers claiming that it takes 9.8 + N to accelerate this object from rest to movement? You disagree that we have to conclude that gravity is the only thing making the object resist acceleration? Go ahead, say something relevant.

originally posted by: MkayUltra
You disagree with your peers claiming that it takes 9.8 + N to accelerate this object from rest to movement? You disagree that we have to conclude that gravity is the only thing making the object resist acceleration? Go ahead, say something relevant.

Yes, I do disagree, because everyone knows it's actually voodoo that does the gravitah, brah.

If a small cat with buttered toast on its back had a mass of 1kg and it managed to get all four paws not to touch the ground, it would float. This is ny the properties of a cat always lands on its paws and buttered toast always lands butter side down. These two properties cancel out eachother and thus making a local antigravity field.

This field repairs stable only until the butter soaks into the toast and dries out making the butter toast property no longer function. Also the cat may in fact eat the toast.

I present this as an alternative to my superglueum theory.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

As expected, a laughable and inept response. Stop trying to derail my thread hotshot.

I love how the people who actually know something are not talking anymore.

a reply to: MkayUltra
I love it how you keep addressing me when I really don't give a # anymore about what you write but just want to have some fun in this ridiculous thread.

@Auggy
That's not good for the dankshaft and dimylinder walls.

It's all irrelevent because it's a lie and the eart is flat.

a reply to: MkayUltra

Teh better explanation is here:
bfy.tw...

a reply to: MkayUltra

There’s all kinds of different simulators for various applications.

One for model rockets…

ROCKSIM V10 SINGLE USER
www.apogeerockets.com...

RockSim is a computer program that allows you to design any size rocket, and then simulate its flight to see how high, and how fast it will fly. Even before you start building your creation, you'll find out if it is stable and safe to launch. Just image how much money you'll save by doing all your test flights on your computer!

You can also use it to pick rocket engines for your kits, or for those made by rocket companies like Apogee Components, Estes, and Aerotech. We use RockSim here at Apogee to create the list of recommended motors for all the rockets we sell on our website.

Let me know if the rocket simulator is erroneous in some way?

As for as relative?

Depends on what your goal of the thread is.

a reply to: neutronflux

The typical random rambling of someone who knows he cant win the actual argument. So that's basically teh Space Universe debunked on page 1. No opposition whatsoever. As expected of course.