Porn maker exposed as organizer of Portland Antifa children's photoshoot

a reply to: RazorV66
Well it's ANTIFA, so right of the bat it's annoying to me.

originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: RazorV66
Well it's ANTIFA, so right of the bat it's annoying to me.

Ok take the emotion out of this first thing. Now some photographers have been involved in porn,but also mainstream photography. Some of playboys best ones were also mainstream photographers. Yeah they may be ANTIFA supporters,but thats is just political,and not in any way sexual is it?

Unless they were taking SEXUAL PICTURES there was no depravity going on here if you look at it minus emotions,and use logic. I Dislike ANTIFA btw.

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: RazorV66
Well it's ANTIFA, so right of the bat it's annoying to me.

Ok take the emotion out of this first thing. Now some photographers have been involved in porn,but also mainstream photography. Some of playboys best ones were also mainstream photographers. Yeah they may be ANTIFA supporters,but thats is just political,and not in any way sexual is it?

Unless they were taking SEXUAL PICTURES there was no depravity going on here if you look at it minus emotions,and use logic. I Dislike ANTIFA btw.

The flyer

"Kids will be partnered with a queer or trans photographer for 30-45 minute photoshoot in the park"


Why does this require a queer or transgender photog? I dunno, I guess I'm ignorant??

From the link in the OP

The flyer was posted by the event organizer's anonymous Twitter account, "@screamingtater." The account's bio states their pronouns as "they/them" and that they're an "antifascist anarchist sex worker." Along with the flyer for the children's photoshoot, the account's Twitter wall is filled with sexually explicit content and posts expressing far-left violent extremist views. By June 26, the account stated that "seven kids signed up," with the youngest being eight years old.

Here's another

Another person who volunteered to photograph the children was Twitter user "@eva_anddxxx." The sex worker account belongs to 27-year-old Geneva Ann Thornhill, another pornographer who makes and sells sexually explicit content.
"Did you know I offer private sales outside of onlyfans? I have over 4 hours worth of sextapes and thousands of photos," wrote Thornhill on the same account. "Send me a dm for details," she wrote with a drooling face emoji.

Another one of the organisers

Birley has called for repeated violence against journalists, including New York Times contributor Sergio Olmos. "Punch him in the face for me if you get the chance," Birley wrote in February this year. "Smash his camera, it's insured!" Birley also expressed support for the firebombing of a pro-life group in Wisconsin by far-left terror group Jane's Revenge. Birley said they wanted to see more terrorist attacks like that. When two police officers were killed by a man while responding to a hostage situation in El Monte, Calif., Birley celebrated the murders by posting an image of balloons, thumbs up and a smiling face.

Nope, sorry, just don't like it. At the very least, some of these people have no business around children. The pictures I saw do not apear to be anything like playboy, more like rented motel room porn. I dunno dude. It's just a tad too much for me.

originally posted by: continuousThunder

originally posted by: litterbaux

originally posted by: continuousThunder
a reply to: vonclod

nahhhh how about you get real

sexual activity is not some strange evil black mark on a soul, you don't become some sort of monster simply by dint of who you have sex with or if you've done it in front of a camera. This wild infantilising purity culture the right is chasing has accelerated so hard in the last six months and it is ridiculous. go to a damn therapist and deal with your damn hangups already.

So you are advocating having sex with children? Please explain.

thank you for illustrating my point! Having sex, even in ways some consider unusual does NOT mean you have sex with children or want to in any way. Why would it?? There's no connection at all, it's just lazy fearmongering. Yet somehow that's the consistent argument here. Gay people are groomers etc etc etc. It's boring and it's incredibly stupid.

Have YOU had sex? Have YOU taken a photo of a child? Statistically speaking the answer to both of those is probably yes, so does that mean you also wish to have sex with children? It makes no sense at all.

OK, I can go along with the logic here. A photographer takes pictures, a professional photographer will pursue profits in his or her career and that could lead into adult subjects like porn. Although highly profitable, child pornography is illegal and outside of professional ethics.

Now, I haven't watched any porn since movies like "The Devil in Miss Jones", "Deep Throat", and a couple of classics from that era, but I can safely say that back then, porn was cheaply produced by a hack crew working with drugged up hookers for the most part, but they had a plot to work with outside of sex acts that were fairly normal by today's standards.

The very few porn clips I've been exposed to since are more extreme and production values haven't improved much either. So I find no real value in any portraiture a porn photographer could produce, especially with children who are not their normal photographic subjects. I find no real logic in any of that and the gay pride theme is admittedly influencing a child's undeveloped prepubescent sexuality, something most would consider a grooming technique.

Also, these photographers are exclusively gay or trans, something that seems to be a requirement in this event. I guess straight photographers without experience in the porn industry need not apply.

originally posted by: continuousThunder
wait wait wait i'm getting confused, where's the line now? if you've been involved in porn you're not allowed to take a photo of a child in a completely unconnected context? No one who's ever taken a sexy selfie and sent it to a partner is allowed near a school? let's just ban anyone who's ever had sex from being anywhere near a child, just to be completely sure.

yea, you are totally right. Having porn workers dress up an 8 year old, and do photoshoots with that kid is totally normal. How could anyone see any issues with THAT?

are you trying out for ring leader in the new clown world presentation?

What if a porn worker wants to have children of their own? Can they dress them or should child services get involved?

originally posted by: continuousThunder
wait wait wait i'm getting confused, where's the line now? if you've been involved in porn you're not allowed to take a photo of a child in a completely unconnected context? No one who's ever taken a sexy selfie and sent it to a partner is allowed near a school? let's just ban anyone who's ever had sex from being anywhere near a child, just to be completely sure.

And I like to have my vaccination shots be administed by a drug addict.

I mean they have lots of experience shooting up right?

So no issues letting them give your kids a few shots? Totally safe and no way would they be looking to get little Johnny hooked on drugs like they are.

Let's go over some safety checks:

Portland - A very sane place
Antifa - Nothing but good folk
Pornographer - Must be of high morals


I am sold! I trust them completely with my child

originally posted by: dandandat2
What if a porn worker wants to have children of their own? Can they dress them or should child services get involved?

probably as long as they keep them out of the movies they would be fine. But this isn't that. You know it.

a reply to: continuousThunder

How much of a deplorable parent would you need to be to send your kid to a park to be dressed by transvestites then to be photographed by someone who’s profession is as a pornographer?

Another nonce that shouldn’t be anywhere near kids. Name taken, if the world ever gets its head screwed back on you folk that support this depravity will be held to account.

a reply to: dandandat2

Depends, do they intend to have a dirty old pervert change their clothes and then take pictures of them?

I hate to break it to you but that’s what trans folk are, mentally ill perverts who think I need to bend over simply because they’re proud of their deviant sexual desires.

Keep LGBT away from our kids! If you identify as a supporter of that movement then you shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near children.

I’d happily hire a gay or lesbian babysitter. Some freak turns up with a full beard, high heels and a mini-skirt on and that’s a different story.

a reply to: continuousThunder

..... let's just ban anyone who's ever had sex from being anywhere near a child, just to be completely sure.

No, just freaks and nonces.

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: continuousThunder

How much of a deplorable parent would you need to be to send your kid to a park to be dressed by transvestites then to be photographed by someone who’s profession is as a pornographer?

Another nonce that shouldn’t be anywhere near kids. Name taken, if the world ever gets its head screwed back on you folk that support this depravity will be held to account.

Oddly I'd feel safer letting my kid get a pic in that crowd than I would letting my kid alone with a priest.

But the actual answer is, as a parent you shouldn't trust anyone with your kids! Just read some stories about all these kids being SA on the carnival cruise kids club. Some of the workers would sell the kids out...

My brain literally can not make sense of why or how anyone would take time to post in defense of this sh*t.

That person in the article is I'll be polite and keep my thoughts of what she looks like to myself.

a reply to: yuppa

They will also for that hour be changing the children's clothing.
What a bunch of see no evils.

originally posted by: dandandat2
What if a porn worker wants to have children of their own? Can they dress them or should child services get involved?

Why would any Parent have a stranger...porn worker or not...undress their child anywhere let alone the park?
Have you seen the statistics on child rape and other such crimes? Why would any caring adult risk a kids future and their mental and physical health?

a reply to: infolurker

I really shouldn't have kept clicking. These people are mentally ill, I have no doubt in my mind after reading through all of this crap.

I had to stop when I got to the tweets from one of these people describing how she had her 7-month-old fetus injected to stop the heartbeat so she could have an abortion. I could never find why she needed this done and how it saved her life. Why oh why would you wait so long? That is truly heartbreaking.

This person is also horribly racist, I am truly saddened at how much of this stuff I am seeing lately.

If you, as a parent, take your kid to such a thing, you have already basically shown that you have no concerns about who or what they interact with, so pornographer is probably not much of a deal for them. Filthy animals.

What’s needed at this point, is for gay people to come out nationally, very publicly and forcefully to condemn these things. If they don’t, then in my eyes they are complicit. They are the ones that stand to lose a lot by their silence.

originally posted by: SeaWorthy
a reply to: yuppa

They will also for that hour be changing the children's clothing.
What a bunch of see no evils.

Unless they are getting them naked I see no problem. why? because professional photographers often change clothes of models. i am sure no people convicted of child crimes is there either. Unless you can prove to me they are perverts by showing me evidence Ill say this is just BIAS talking. Pure emotion, flipping knee jerk democrat socialist reactions in this thread.Even though some of them are not Democrats still acting like them here.

I was watching a gaming youtuber the other day and in the middle of a video an ad popped up advertising a film about a young girl who wants to go into the porn industry. I looked up the film and it's about a girl who is willing to do anything to make it so she does more and more hardcore scenes like BDSM/gangbangs etc. Along with that Netflix film cuties it's disgusting honestly.