Does anyone think that Americans will actually revolt if the midterms are stolen by the DNC?

At this moment looking at polls and just how fubar everything is, common sense would tell you that there is no way any Dem would win anywhere but the most commie areas of the USA. However, I have faith in them to continue to steal elections.

What will happen if the election is clearly stolen and our courts and legal systems do nothing to stop it?

Will Americans actually take it to the streets or will they continue to take it out on their keyboards?

a reply to: greendust

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas just made it easier for revolters to get the job done.

gettr.com...

God bless him!

We the people are entirely pissed off. If it a steal the people may as well hang a few high ranking thief’s. Not personally, I’m just saying.

a reply to: greendust

I imagine some people will take to the streets if their desired party loses. I don't think enough people actually care if it is a D or a R in office to see a full-scale revolt over mid-terms. 

However, I think we will see mass civil unrest due to the economy. 

I think mainstream USA is too submissive to revolt. we will go on with our lives and go to our jobs and complain and suffer.

if the Republicans win big we will see rioting and possible legal action.

the real question is the 2024 President election. if the Republicans win that the left will go full berserker, and the dems and media will encourage going to the streets.

Americans watched as the children screamed at the sky when the election theft in 2016 failed.
Americans were more than annoyed when they watched as the election theft in 2020 succeeded.

Americans have been punished daily following the regime change, and are more discomforted by the collapse their society every time they go to work.

What happens next is anyone's guess- most people are willing to let authority slide just a little bit more every day...
But if what we're seeing snowballs, the carpet is going to fall out from under government in a real hurry.

They're systematically destroying food and energy.
What does someone need to live short term?
-Food
-Water
-Shelter

Long term can also be broken down into those categories, if you consider that you need to be *producing* at least as much of those resources as you'll need, in time before you need them.

Considering at least two of those currently depend heavily on energy, and the current government is:
-destroying energy by any means possible
-running out of WATER and not doing anything to prevent it
-Avoiding dealing with creating SHELTER while printing free money to make the problem worse
-Ignoring and / or supporting the FOOD supply chain collapsing (more corn to go towards gas, which helps neither food nor gas... hundreds of food procesing plants burning to the ground for no reason, tens of thousands of cattle just dying, being blamed on climate change when their climate hasn't changed...)

I'd say nobody will do a God Damned thing, for now... But once they're hungry they're not going to starve to death quietly.
Hungry people are dangerous, and Americans are armed specifically to deal with insane/corrupt governments.

I'm not convinced the founding fathers ever imagined cities like NY, LA, or even Dallas existing- In the year 1800 the entire US population was 5.3m, today LA alone is 4m - not counting people who don't fill in the census, which in LA is likely a lot.
Even if they did forsee this sort of situation, they likely just assumed we'd see a mass starvation event like the one we're about to encounter.

Maybe if humans didn't act like locusts, this wouldn't be a problem... but meanwhile no politics can stop what's coming. The current politics are just encouraging it to go full violent dystopian nightmare instead of a slow decline where people choose to die instead of depriving their family of the food they'd need to live.

We're all going to die in the end anyway. I guess the war hungry democrats just want it all to end in bloodshed and hate.

a reply to: greendust

We'll do nothing.

A recommended reading would be, "The Good German" by Dennis Praeger.

a reply to: DBCowboy

I agree. It'll be a whole lotta "why, I oughta!" equalling nadda.

originally posted by: greendust
....

What will happen if the election is clearly stolen and our courts and legal systems do nothing to stop it?

There is no such thing as "the election" in the midterms. There are 435 Representative seats and 35 Senate seats up for grabs, not to mention 30+ State and local officers. That's at least 500 or so elections.

This is different from Presidential elections, where every voter in the nation simultaneously participates in "the election" and has a stake in the outcome.

If there is some voting irregularity in a rural county in Alabama--just to take a random example--I doubt that people are going to take to the streets in Colorado--to take another random example.

Most Americans don't even know who the president is....so the answer is no....nothing will be done.

Jay Leno proved this on Jay walk skits showing U.S. college students are pure idiots.

You want a civil war in U.S.? Close down all fast food joints and watch the fists fly.....

Government? Most could care less as long as the fast food joints are open......

a reply to: greendust

a reply to: greendust

I don't think so. We have accepted it and don't feel empowered enough to do anything like that. It's a slow bleed from here

originally posted by: lordcomac
Americans watched as the children screamed at the sky when the election theft in 2016 failed.
Americans were more than annoyed when they watched as the election theft in 2020 succeeded.

Americans have been punished daily following the regime change, and are more discomforted by the collapse their society every time they go to work.

What happens next is anyone's guess- most people are willing to let authority slide just a little bit more every day...
But if what we're seeing snowballs, the carpet is going to fall out from under government in a real hurry.

They're systematically destroying food and energy.
What does someone need to live short term?
-Food
-Water
-Shelter

Long term can also be broken down into those categories, if you consider that you need to be *producing* at least as much of those resources as you'll need, in time before you need them.

Considering at least two of those currently depend heavily on energy, and the current government is:
-destroying energy by any means possible
-running out of WATER and not doing anything to prevent it
-Avoiding dealing with creating SHELTER while printing free money to make the problem worse
-Ignoring and / or supporting the FOOD supply chain collapsing (more corn to go towards gas, which helps neither food nor gas... hundreds of food procesing plants burning to the ground for no reason, tens of thousands of cattle just dying, being blamed on climate change when their climate hasn't changed...)

I'd say nobody will do a God Damned thing, for now... But once they're hungry they're not going to starve to death quietly.
Hungry people are dangerous, and Americans are armed specifically to deal with insane/corrupt governments.

I'm not convinced the founding fathers ever imagined cities like NY, LA, or even Dallas existing- In the year 1800 the entire US population was 5.3m, today LA alone is 4m - not counting people who don't fill in the census, which in LA is likely a lot.
Even if they did forsee this sort of situation, they likely just assumed we'd see a mass starvation event like the one we're about to encounter.

Maybe if humans didn't act like locusts, this wouldn't be a problem... but meanwhile no politics can stop what's coming. The current politics are just encouraging it to go full violent dystopian nightmare instead of a slow decline where people choose to die instead of depriving their family of the food they'd need to live.

We're all going to die in the end anyway. I guess the war hungry democrats just want it all to end in bloodshed and hate.

I'm shocked that I'm the first person to star your post.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: greendust

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas just made it easier for revolters to get the job done.

gettr.com...

God bless him!

Maybe a link to the actual article and a quote to illustrate relevance to the topic would be useful.

Regarding the substance of the publication, I don't see how relaxing application rigor for concealed carry permits serves to encourage "revolters" in their objectives (whatever that may be)

a reply to: greendust

They've always been revolting; this time, they're rebelling!

I had to get that out of my system. I don't see anything good happening with it, but then again, I don't know that it would be a full-on situation. Likely a few pockets of folks, if anything at all.

a reply to: greendust

If they can put serial numbers on our paper money they can put serial numbers on the voting ballots.

I truly don't think so. The people worst affected with this sort of thing are all tied up with their work and families and have very little time to stop what theyre doing and play politics with some feral and savage left that has no such responsibilities. The economy would need to grind to a halt while everyone picks up their weapons and put a real end to the trouble so they can return to their peaceful lives of working and saving and raising families. Pretty damn simple.

Not from the US and don't have a crystal ball (I do have a pendulum, but don't use it lightly), but wouldn't it be the opportune time to start World War Three, or at least to make it official?

Oops, we can't vote now, all the guys with biological thingies (you know) are drafted immediately.

Like a narcissistic relationship rationale: if we can't have the US nobody will!

What make you think we won't shoot back?

Just asking. Also, if Republicans win, what makes you think Dems won't start up?

Be careful what you ask for. Trump supporters are under the impression the rest of us don't have guns. WE DO!

And blacks, gays, trans, Asians and the like. You NEED to get an AR-15, a shotgun and a pistol at a minimum, and you need to learn how to use them. DO IT NOW!


a reply to: carewemust

a reply to: lordcomac

I don't think they will, but they should.