Study: Less than 6% of “Approved” Medical Drugs Backed By Quality Studies - Significant Harms

It turns out the Covid shots are the rule not the exception. Accodring to a new study from the University of Oxford, 94% of drugs approved since 2008 are not supported by high quality evidence and side effects are severely underreported. So essentially, we don't need to argue anymore about the Covid "vaccines," we can just refer to them as simply a normal drug that finds itself in the company of the overwhelming majority of all modern approved drugs.

Big Pharma is just using the same business model it has always used. Sometimes the government gives them a slap on the wrist if a few hundred thousand people die, and other times they give them a pass. They have not changed their strategyl, and why would they? With so much guaranteed profit flowing in from unproven drugs like the mRNA vaccines that are covered by an EUA so they can never be sued, it's a gravy train of proit, forget about safety.

“Of 1567 eligible interventions, 87 (5.6%) had high quality evidence on first-listed primary outcomes, positive, statistically significant results and were rated by review authors as beneficial.”

Unbelievably, the majority of these drugs could not even pass the ‘moderate-quality’ review, with over 50% failing to meet the reduced threshold.

Nearly 10% of the approved medications were found to have “significant evidence of harm.”

Wtf?

According to a newly released study by the University of Oxford, a jaw-dropping 94% of recently approved medications are not supported by high-quality evidence that demonstrates their benefits. What’s more, just like with the experimental Covid-19 ‘vaccines,’ side effects and adverse reactions to these drugs are being severely underreported across the board.

When looking at medical drugs that have been approved since 2008 under the Cochrane reviews – a “leading” international journal and database that is endorsed by over 100 organizations worldwide, including the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) -researchers determined that just 87 of the 1,567 medications (6%) had clinical data that met the “high-quality” standard.

While 94% of drugs lack evidence and could be dangerous, every single one of them still has a 100% chance at increasing the size of Big Pharma's bank accounts.

SOURCE

TPG Write Up

a reply to: v1rtu0s0
So are Americans being druged up?

originally posted by: musicismagic
a reply to: v1rtu0s0
So are Americans being druged up?

You bet they are! A friend of mine is taking 16 different prescriptions!! When he's not feeling well, nobody can tell whether it's a new illness or a drug side effect, or an interaction between any of the other drugs he's on. Poor guy, and he's only 56 yrs old. His main health issue that started all this about 5 yrs ago was arthritis

originally posted by: GlobalGold
a reply to: musicismagic
A friend of mine is taking 16 different prescriptions!! When he's not feeling well, nobody can tell whether it's a new illness or a drug side effect, or an interaction between any of the other drugs he's on. Poor guy, and he's only 56 yrs old. His main health issue that started all this about 5 yrs ago was arthritis

This is what you get when you relegate responsibility for your own life/health to someone else.

a reply to: GlobalGold


He’d be better off taking turmeric and black pepper capsules (all natural sold in drugstores). It works.


Unless of course he’s allergic to any of those two ingredients.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0
You don't unconditionally trust pharma companies? What are you, some kind of anti-vaxxer?

100%?
That is fairly high, yes?

originally posted by: GlobalGold

originally posted by: musicismagic
a reply to: v1rtu0s0
So are Americans being druged up?

You bet they are! A friend of mine is taking 16 different prescriptions!! When he's not feeling well, nobody can tell whether it's a new illness or a drug side effect, or an interaction between any of the other drugs he's on. Poor guy, and he's only 56 yrs old. His main health issue that started all this about 5 yrs ago was arthritis

This is why I won't let them prescribe me anything new. Because then it's new prescription after new prescription treating side effects. No thanks.

This doesn't surprise me at all. For those of us who still watch traditional TV, what are all the commercials?

A. "Do you have [insert medical condition]? Ask your doctor about [new Big Pharma drug]."
B. "Did you take [insert old Big Pharma drug that was in A-type commercials 10 years ago] and have [insert medical condition caused by said drug]? Call the law offices of [insert lawyer on massive class action]."

It's a revolving door. They make billions getting doctors to prescribe it to everyone and their uncle, pay maybe a few hundred million in a class action a decade or two later. Rinse, repeat. It's been going on for decades.

And, by the way, this is all done by scientists and doctors. You know, the "experts" that we were supposed to listen to like gods during the pandemic. The experts that, in all likelihood, caused the pandemic. Science is corrupt, like everything else.

a reply to: GlobalGold

should have just started swimming and doing stretching

Hmmm. I wonder what party was in the Whitehouse back in 2008 that would have approved this kind of change that changed safety guidelines to allow that?

a reply to: face23785

Am afraid to dig into who owns those SOB Lawyer-Firms™, afraid that some are owned by the same interests that own everything.

Even if there is no link : there's still always a trickle-out effect, like owning the building where the firm is, profiting from their TV commercials because of ownership of the station, etc...

Let's say you have a national television chain, named WTF TV, publicly-traded, but owned majorly by Rackblock and Ganvard, etc...
Then they have a broadcast channel named WWTF.

You see the commercials peddling the Big-Harma™ products, back-to-back with the SOB Lawyer-Firm™ commercials.
The owners of the TV chain are profiting from both.
That would be the secondary method, of extracting wealth from the working slaves.

Maybe the supposed punch-up and conflict : are all just theatre ?
Just another distraction ?

It's those with the dirty mitts that we're looking at...

Science™ is a cesspool of corruption.
Sure it let itself get corrupted, one day at a time.
But we're looking at the corruptors.
Same pricks who have corrupted all of " our " institutions into Institutions™ ; governments into Governments™; food into Frankenfoods™ ; etc...

Billions spent on Lobbying™, Marketing™, Advertising™, Brainwashing™, and " Penetrating™ " anyplace that decisions are made.

Does anybody really think that they don't spend a few million on internet " Influencers™ " ?

And here comes the flow of fools, ready to defend their slave-owners...

The Jones-Plantation is where we live.

Bingo a reply to: tanstaafl

originally posted by: chris_stibrany
a reply to: GlobalGold

should have just started swimming and doing stretching

Which would have done nothing...

All, and I mean all, of these chronic 'diseases' are simply the result of eating 'stuff' (ie, plants - all plants) that is not a normal part of the proper human diet (mostly meat and fat from largely ruminant animals, and other supplemental animal foods like eggs, fish, etc etc).

Auto-immune 'diseases' - like 'arthritis', which is just one symptom of systemic inflammation - respond in just days or weeks to a change to the proper human diet.

originally posted by: KTemplar
a reply to: GlobalGold

He’d be better off taking turmeric and black pepper capsules (all natural sold in drugstores). It works.

Sometimes, but it is just masking the symptoms by partially reducing the inflammation.

The only way to eliminate is to eliminate the source - plant foods. All of them.

a reply to: tanstaafl

Are you honestly saying we are not meant to eat any plants whatsoever? We are omnivores, we need the fiber and minerals from plants too.

originally posted by: chris_stibrany
a reply to: tanstaafl

Are you honestly saying we are not meant to eat any plants whatsoever? We are omnivores, we need the fiber and minerals from plants too.

I think it depends. The way many plants are harvested, like using glyphosate, growing in depleted soil, other pesticides, and GMO's makes them horrible. And that is on top of many of them naturally having lectins and other things like wheat gluten. If a deer eats wheat it gets sick to its stomach and learns never to eat it again. Humans have learned to tolerate it, but that doesn't mean gluten isn't inflammatory, it's just less so for people who don't feel bothered. I think a few plants are okay but most of them probably have pretty bad effects.

I think most of us have learned by now to do the opposite of what the government says. The food pyramid used to have grains and milk toward the bottom, and meat toward the top. You pretty much have to do the opposite of whatever they say.

originally posted by: chris_stibrany
a reply to: tanstaafl

Are you honestly saying we are not meant to eat any plants whatsoever?

Not beyond the rare occasions necessary to prevent starvation. Yes, that is whay I'm saying.

We are omnivores,

Nope, stable isotope test and the historical anthropological record proves beyond doubt that were obligate super/hyper-carnivores. This is no longer in question, according to real, actual science, as opposed to epidemiological pseudo-'science'.

we need the fiber and minerals from plants too.

Nope again. MDR for fiber, like carbs, is a whopping absolute ZERO. In fact, fiber is the primary cause for constipation and all of the IBS/Crohns type 'diseases' that a very large percentage of the population has now.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
a reply to: chris_stibrany
I think it depends. The way many plants are harvested, like using glyphosate, growing in depleted soil, other pesticides, and GMO's makes them horrible.

That makes them worse, yes, but no, that is not even remotely the primary reason.

And that is on top of many of them naturally having lectins and other things like wheat gluten.

Not most of them, and not just lectins and gluten, they are loaded with naturally occurring carcinogens and toxins. This is the way plants defend themselves (since they can't run away from predators). All of them, and most having far more and in larger quantities than the pesticides and herbicides they are sprayed with.