Do liberals not see/hear how contradictional they sound in their views vs reality?

a reply to: shooterbrody

a reply to: SourGrapes

LOL It was an unconstitutional law because the court found that a woman has a constitutional right to an abortion.

Roe V Wade was the first abortion case SCOTUS heard, so the 1973 court was the first court to recognize a woman's constitutional right to abortion and SCOTUS has reaffirmed it over and over again.

a reply to: SourGrapes

They ruled WRONG

Why do you think that? Do you think that a woman should not have autonomy over her own body? Do you think that a woman should be punished by pregnancy for having casual sex?

a reply to: Sookiechacha
Why won’t the dem controlled congress pass a law and make it legal?

a reply to: shooterbrody

It's not a matter of won't.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

So, you believe abortion should be a God (or Creator) given Right?

Why does it HAVE to be a Constitutional Right and not just decriminalized?

Should we ALSO have the "Right" to smoke weed? Consume alcohol?

Should those also be included in "inalienable rights"?

Why stop there?

How about the right to kill anyone? Why stop at unborn, or (gasp) born, humans?

Do unborn humans have the right to "Life"?

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: shooterbrody

It's not a matter of won't.

Bull crap
The dems have the house
The dems have the senate
The dems have potus

It is ALL ABOUT WONT

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Sookiechacha
Why won’t the dem controlled congress pass a law and make it legal?

EXACTLY! WTF does EVERYTHING have to be a "right"?

Why can't it be given back to the States (where it belongs, like weed and alcohol) to Govern?

That should 100% be up to each state to decide.

a reply to: SourGrapes

So, you believe abortion should be a God (or Creator) given Right?

It is. Absolutely!

Why does it HAVE to be a Constitutional Right and not just decriminalized?

It's about physical autonomy and self-determination.

Should we ALSO have the "Right" to smoke weed? Consume alcohol?

Why should those choices be up to the government?

Should those also be included in "inalienable rights"?

According the the Declaration of Independence, not the Bill of Rights or the US Constitution, Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness are inalienable rights. The Constitution and the Bill of Rights detail when and how the US Government can allow those rights to be violated.

Why stop at unborn

Why not force people to donate kidneys, blood, room and board to those in need, if would save a life?

a reply to: SourGrapes
If there were ANY support for baby murder the dems in congress would have passed a bill so fast it would make Biden dizzy.
If they pass it they will be unemployed.
The dems are pretending the public supports it because the public puts up with it.
There is no widespread support of baby murder period.

It is ok that people hate your policies dems.

No. They do not.
Because even the meaning of the word "liberal". Doesn't mean what it used to mean.
The U.S.A. was founded as a very "liberal" Republic.
Freedom and "liberty" of the individual, was actually codefied into "law". There was none of this nonsense of "democracy", or a "majority", gets to deside what you "need".

But a system like that/this, can only work when everyone is on the same page as to, what is right and what is wrong.

Now days, a "Democratic majority" of "liberals", know which public restroom they're supposed to use.
Most sane "Democratic" taxpayers, wouldn't pay to put Tampons in a mens bathroom.

Our C.O.T.U.S tells the "government" what is right and what is wrong. It wasn't designed for us. It was designed to tell "it", what it couldn't do! For a reason. The founders knew what they were doing.

There is right and wrong. There is good and evil.
There is no but, what about? In a good moral and constitutional grounding. Everything else, is... Pathetic emotional nonsense.

"Liberal",... Liberty and freedom is easy.

But if you have been government trained/educated?
You may believe that you are of the "majority". And have a say in what an "individual" "needs", or where thier liberty ends or begins.

Which is socialism. Which is anti-American. Which is evil.

It is that simple.

a reply to: SortingHat

What do Die Hard Liberals Contribute to American Society other than Sucking off of the Government Teet for " Free Stuff " and Bitching and Moaning about Everything Under the Sun ? They are All Burdens and Non Assets IMO .

originally posted by: SortingHat
a reply to: starshift

I've notice most Liberals react more emotional. I wonder if it's because the majority are women as women biologically are different no matter how much we may pretend otherwise. Nothing wrong with being more emotional if you put it into a more positive goal and recognize how it can be a trap against you.

They use to be called bleeding heart liberals.
They were solely led by emotion and no logic.

It a boat was sinking and there was one life raft, liberals would try and bring everyone they can on board which would eventually sink the raft, killing everyone. They don't have the balls to stop people from sinking the raft.

We see this mentality at the border and with criminals they dont have the balls

As a minority in America, I pretty much grew up being indoctrinated into the idea that I was a Democrat, and that this was the party that had my best interest. Forget the fact that the whole party system is one of the top divide and conquer tactics of the elite, us vs them, and forget the fact that as a child in elementary/middle school, the teachers informed us that the Democrat party is the party with racist roots, the sheep continue to blindly vote based on identity politics. Actual slavery may have ended a long time ago, but the plantation just rebranded itself as the Democrat party. Much like children are brainwashed into religious ideology, before they even have a chance to figure out what it is that they believe, politics isn't much different. It's the reason why extremists cant separate religion from fact, the two are interchangeable, making it less likely to utilize common sense and critical thinking. Much like how the far left and the far right are least likely to find common ground. I am tolerant of all religions, as long as they don't push their views on others, you're free to think and believe whatever you want. I was an atheist for many years before I became spiritual, and I think it is important to believe in something, anything, even if its just yourself, yet I have and always will consider myself a person of logic and reason. I don't stand on either side, left or right, call me a moderate, call me a fence sitter, I see the problems on both sides, and because of my unpopular opinions, I really don't fit in with either group. That being said, I despise the left so much right now and have for a while. I hate hypocrites who contradict themselves. I can probably think of multiple examples of the hypocrisy, like how in my city, New York, its a "gun-free zone", because criminals follow the law. Despite the increase of violent crimes, you can't even carry a 6 inch blade or order a taser for protection. They would rather you be a victim than to defend yourself, and to ensure this, they release violent offenders with whole spreadsheets of felonies, into the general public. You can't prove rehabilitation, but you also wouldn't attempt to tame a wild lion and release it into the streets. If these parole boards, judges, DA's, and politicians who support these soft on crime policies were held accountable for every criminal they release who goes on to commit further crimes, do you honestly believe they would trust releasing them? No, but they're secure releasing them back into your communities. Not only are they not held liable, but many of them live behind gated walls and have armed security. They cant relate to the common man's problems. As if that wasn't enough, woke ideology and policies, the left stoke the flames of racial tension by bending over backwards in a contest to see who can "appear" the most progressive. Standing with corrupt movements or domestic terrorists like BLM, defunding the police, and tying their hands when they actually do their jobs and pursue criminals, yet when the rise in crime inevitably happens they question why the police aren't doing enough. I think no better current example exists of the left's hypocrisy than the "Jan. 6th Insurrection". How they raised those capitol police on a pedestal, called them heroes, and even had them publicly testify to tug on the heart strings of America, all because it was their asses who were scared and needed protection that day, and it was from "Trump's MAGA People". Now, let me bring you back to the 2020 riots when people were violently "protesting" and committing chaos through the streets of America, lootin', shootin', you name it! When angry mobs were hurling canned goods, frozen water bottles, and water bottles filled with cement at law enforcement. Ya'll remember that? I sure do, and the silence from the left was deafening. Police lives didn't matter to them then. Keep the same energy, because the contradictions of the left have become so blatant and in your face that anyone who can continue to vote for them, is a lost cause in my opinion. As a black lgbtq+ person from the Bronx who thinks the far right are a bunch of bible thumpers, much like the extremists who can't distinguish fiction from reality, and who thinks the far left try so hard just to look progressive that they've completely lost the plot, who found Donald Trump refreshing, who is pro choice, and pro second amendment, I have no place on either side, but if I had to choose, I would take my chances with the right right now.

a reply to: SortingHat

Sometimes it takes a physical "wake-up call"

Like This: truthsocial.com...

7.19.2022

VIP LIBERAL TELLS CONGRESS

"I owe my life to abortion!"

Brief Clip: truthsocial.com...

Biden is infecting them, more and more...