Police Never Tried To Open Door To Get In Texas Classroom Where Shooter Was

They didn't even try the doors!

The doors may (most probably) were not even locked! They used the excuse that the doors were locked and they needed a key, which appears to be false. Also notice, when the BP went in and shot the little B*&tard that they never mentioned if they broke down the doors or simply opened them and stepped in.

BREAKING: Video Shows Police Never Tried To Open Door To Get In Texas Classroom Where Shooter Was, Report Says

www.dailywire.com...

Law enforcement officials reportedly never tried to open the door at a Texas elementary school last month where a shooter murdered 19 children.

“Surveillance footage shows that police never tried to open a door to two classrooms at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde in the 77 minutes between the time a gunman entered the rooms and massacred 21 people and officers finally breached the door and killed him,” the San Antonio Express-News reported, noting that the information came from a law enforcement official who was involved in investigating law enforcement’s response to the tragedy. “Investigators believe the 18-year-old gunman who killed 19 children and two teachers at the school on May 24 could not have locked the door to the connected classrooms from the inside.”

a reply to: infolurker
Pretty sad! At least one of the kids, who was shot, could have been saved had the police had done their jobs, but they Bled out. The chief should get jail time, because he was completely negligent! He made the call, and sat there while children were being murdered.

Whomever made the call to stand down is a complete coward. I try to back the blue, I know it's a hard job. I personally know some local cops and deputies whom have all said (granted most of them have children in school) there's not a way in hell that they are standing out front while kids are getting massacred. This situation shines a light on the fact that in every profession there are bad apples, unfortunately in law enforcement, it could cost lifes.

All I can say is, there's no justice like small town justice.

Police are under zero legal obligation to protect anyone. The people who are responsible for the deaths are firstly the killer and secondarily anyone who opposed the hardening of soft target locations full of children who cannot protect themselves.

You'd think since the coward of Broward incident people would wake up, but I guess not. Emotional stroking and superficial policies are not enough. Does anyone really wonder why he went to a school and not a police station? Why a school and not the local gun club? The killer wanted maximum travesty with the lowest personal risk, he found it there because people who make gun free zone policies are idealists and expect everyone else to have the same heart they do.

It's time to wake up. You are responsible for your own safety, and your community will fail your children who cannot protect themselves in such regard unless something changes. Stop listening to feel-good politicians who lead you by the nose into emotional voting, stop expecting the merits of meritless people to protect yourself and your community.

Violence is not the answer, it's the question. If your answer isn't "yes" then you can be exploited violently. Do not be a victim and do not let the state serve your children into victimhood. They are worth protecting with more than locked doors, posted notices, and a police force minutes away that will often times do very little to save lives at any rate. We need to end all gun free zones and install a trained and armed security force within these schools, period.

I can halfway understand a beat cop, but they had a trained SWAT team at some point on the scene.

This bothers me, especially when I know about the mom going to get her child and their friend

a reply to: infolurker

The doors may (most probably) were not even locked! They used the excuse that the doors were locked and they needed a key, which appears to be false.

most of the police standing outside that school had a Shotgun in there Cop Car at least half of them did , and that Shotgun could have been used to Breach any door in that school in seconds.

What happened that day was preventable and it almost seems like the Cops were purposefully prevented from doing there Jobs .

The Benghazi Attack and Hillary Clinton comes to mind .

a reply to: infolurker

Unlocked doors

Massive armed police presence

PLUS SWAT team

And still the police did NOTHING, stood down.

Meanwhile, a SINGLE OFF-DUTY Border Patrol agent was able to enter the school with a shotgun borrowed from his barber and end this crisis by shooting the killer....and he is getting NO recognition he is due by the WhiteHouse or anyone for his bravery


Only one possible conclusion:
The chief of police/his controller wanted these children murdered, for political reasons.

a reply to: AstroDog
The courts may say they don't have to protect you yet the police take an oath to "Serve and protect". So I guess the oath doesn't mean Jack! Does the oath Doctors take hold the same validity? " do no harm" or "treat patients to the best of my ability". I guess a persons oath and word means 0! Sad! Some police cars literally say "to serve and protect". If you go through training for mass shootings, and don't want to step up, you are a disgraceful POS!.

Imagine our military being this way!

a reply to: infolurker

Which than raises the question was this allowed to open on propose?

originally posted by: AstroDog
Police are under zero legal obligation to protect anyone.
We need to end all gun free zones

fyi The police did have guns,
and pay$
"to serve and protect"
Did you get a cofefe dumb-down jab
or something?

A k-9 would have done the job for them .

originally posted by: ToneDeaf

originally posted by: AstroDog
Police are under zero legal obligation to protect anyone.
We need to end all gun free zones

fyi The police did have guns,
and pay$
"to serve and protect"
Did you get a cofefe dumb-down jab
or something?

I guess you are unaware, the courts ruled, police have no duty to serve or protect anyone. That's a sad fact, they can ruin your life, but maybe not so much interested in saving it.

Fire em all.

a reply to: ToneDeaf
I agree with you. The courts do not. They are not required to. Read my above post.


ehlinelaw.com...

originally posted by: Backagain
a reply to: AstroDog
The courts may say they don't have to protect you yet the police take an oath to "Serve and protect". So I guess the oath doesn't mean Jack! Does the oath Doctors take hold the same validity? " do no harm" or "treat patients to the best of my ability". I guess a persons oath and word means 0! Sad! Some police cars literally say "to serve and protect". If you go through training for mass shootings, and don't want to step up, you are a disgraceful POS!.

Imagine our military being this way!

Imagine our appointed officials and judges, taking an oath to uphold the constitution and then trying to destroy it in a quest for more authority

a reply to: ToneDeaf

Do you want to try that rebuttal like an adult so I can take it seriously, or do you expect me to clarify what I already posted for you just because you're being condescending?

Why raid a Smith Mundt productions photo shoot?

originally posted by: infolurker
They didn't even try the doors!

The doors may (most probably) were not even locked! They used the excuse that the doors were locked and they needed a key, which appears to be false. Also notice, when the BP went in and shot the little B*&tard that they never mentioned if they broke down the doors or simply opened them and stepped in.

BREAKING: Video Shows Police Never Tried To Open Door To Get In Texas Classroom Where Shooter Was, Report Says

www.dailywire.com...

Law enforcement officials reportedly never tried to open the door at a Texas elementary school last month where a shooter murdered 19 children.

“Surveillance footage shows that police never tried to open a door to two classrooms at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde in the 77 minutes between the time a gunman entered the rooms and massacred 21 people and officers finally breached the door and killed him,” the San Antonio Express-News reported, noting that the information came from a law enforcement official who was involved in investigating law enforcement’s response to the tragedy. “Investigators believe the 18-year-old gunman who killed 19 children and two teachers at the school on May 24 could not have locked the door to the connected classrooms from the inside.”

Police have become the convenient scapegoat to deflect attention from real questions about the shooter. Not that police don't deserve scrutiny.

a reply to: infolurker

This is what happens when you militarize the police. They hide behind proper tactics and overwhelming force rather than just acting. The reality of the situation is that they have been militarized and act like an occupying force. They do not feel a sense of urgency or duty to protect the citizens. They are not part of the community anymore they are the jailers and enforcers for their masters.

All of the explanations so far have been.. we had him contained - we had to wait until we got the go ahead - we had to have everything just so in order to move... just excuses to shift blame. The reality is they did not care about those kids or the families in the community. They only cared about their safety. I bet the nice wealthy elite schools where their masters send their children have armed security that will in fact act rather than wait and let those kids be slaughtered. I also bet cops responding to something similar at one of those schools wouldn't wait or be allowed to wait.

Your children dont matter to these people and neither do you.

I would like to think at least one of the cops paternal instict would of kicked in, That would make them stop at nothing to get into that classroom.