It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Talaria
Because we’re literally in a CIVIL WAR, obviously the one side thats making noise and drama messing up America, this group has many little factions and are organized using anything and everything and the opposite side that sees what is happening but is just waiting for a leader with b*lls (True Patriot) willing to give up his life for the America we once loved, oh its going to get really really ugly, before a turn around serious sh*t brewing!
originally posted by: 1947boomer
originally posted by: CryHavoc
Could any one please explain why people burning down a Minneapolis Police Station on May 28, 2020 WASN'T Insurrection.
The definition of Insurrection is: a violent uprising against an authority or government.
.......
Yes, I think I can explain why burning down a Minneapolis Police Station on May 28, 2020 WASN'T Insurrection.
Your definition: "a violent uprising against an authority or government" is faulty.
If you want to hold someone legally accountable for a violent act you have to charge them under a specific law that is on the books and use the correct LEGAL terms defined by that law, not some definition you plucked out of a dictionary.
It turns out that Minnesota has a law on the books that covers possible acts of insurrection:
"609.385 TREASON.
Subdivision 1.Definition. "Levying war" includes an act of war or an insurrection of several persons with intent to prevent, by force and intimidation, the execution of a statute of the state, or to force its repeal. It does not include either a conspiracy to commit an act of war or a single instance of resistance for a private purpose to the execution of a law."
www.revisor.mn.gov...
The individuals who torched the police station were deemed by the local authorities to be committing "a single instance of resistance for a private purpose" and could not be charged under this particular state statute.
Instead, the four individuals who were identified as actually torching the police station were charged under a federal charge of conspiracy to commit arson.
www.justice.gov...
All 4 pleaded guilty and have been sentenced.
In addition, one Boogaloo Boi (a Texan named Ivan Hunter) also pleaded guilty to a federal charge of "traveling from San Antonio, Texas to Minneapolis with the intent to participate in a riot."
"On the night of May 28, 2020, Hunter was captured on video discharging 13 rounds from an AK-47 style semiautomatic rifle into the Minneapolis Police Department’s Third Precinct building. At the time of the shooting there were other individuals believed to be looters still inside the building. Law enforcement recovered from the scene discharged rifle casings consistent with an AK-47 style firearm."
www.justice.gov...
What additional facts do you imagine a Congressional hearing on this event would uncover that aren't already known?
originally posted by: CryHavoc
Could any one please explain why people burning down a Minneapolis Police Station on May 28, 2020 WASN'T Insurrection.
The definition of Insurrection is: a violent uprising against an authority or government.
Seems to me that's exactly what happened in Minneapolis. And how many people in Congress supported that illegal Insurrection? So why isn't there a May 28th Insurrection Committee? Why is Kamala Harris Vice President as she supported that Insurrection?
How many people were/are Derelict in their Duties? How many Obstructed Justice?
I think it's really time to hold Congress accountable.
If Congress is going after one group, it better be going after both.
I'm not sure if you really want them to start investigating.
originally posted by: AutomateThis1v2
originally posted by: lordcomac
Congress is overrun with traitors- the government is overflowing with them. The time to clean house is long overdue
Who is going to clean house? Lol
All the keyboard patriots? lmao
originally posted by: AmICrazyOrwhat
a reply to: Brotherman
Beautifully said.. Having an opinion is intolerant. It’s close minded to reject the idea a human can now refuse a gender. The general consensus is I’m an asshole for having these non compliant thoughts.
originally posted by: sarahvital
did the cops get the looters?