NIH admits COVID-19 is a scam

Interesting to find this article on the official US NIH site...

COVID UPDATE: What is the truth?

The COVID-19 pandemic is one of the most manipulated infectious disease events in history, characterized by official lies in an unending stream lead by government bureaucracies, medical associations, medical boards, the media, and international agencies. We have witnessed a long list of unprecedented intrusions into medical practice, including attacks on medical experts, destruction of medical careers among doctors refusing to participate in killing their patients and a massive regimentation of health care, led by non-qualified individuals with enormous wealth, power and influence.

For the first time in American history a president, governors, mayors, hospital administrators and federal bureaucrats are determining medical treatments based not on accurate scientifically based or even experience based information, but rather to force the acceptance of special forms of care and “prevention”—including remdesivir, use of respirators and ultimately a series of essentially untested messenger RNA vaccines. For the first time in history medical treatment, protocols are not being formulated based on the experience of the physicians treating the largest number of patients successfully, but rather individuals and bureaucracies that have never treated a single patient—including Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, EcoHealth Alliance, the CDC, WHO, state public health officers and hospital administrators.

Your thoughts?

web.archive.org...*/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov... (The Wayback machine link; sorry, ATS' markup doesn't like it, so no hyperlink)

a reply to: StrangeCottageCheese

My interpretation, fwiw:

If you refused to put your Covid-19 patient on a ventilator, Anthony "Mengele" Fauci would signal that you are to be ruined career-wise.

a reply to: StrangeCottageCheese

well i guess now that smilin francis collins ain't in charge anymore little fauci doesn't have quite the pull he used to have.
and more rational heads are able to speak freely.

a reply to: StrangeCottageCheese

Russell L. Blaylock


This is a link to the Author of the Paper , you know just in case people start attacking his credentials.

I wonder when the government will lift the 'vaccination' requirement for non-US travelers to the US?
Oh that's right they won't, as none of these revelations will make a difference.

We are ruled by criminals .
If those behind this plandemic don't see ACTUAL JAIL OR DEATH SENTENCES , not theater, then the US is done.

a reply to: StrangeCottageCheese

This was already posted and there was some discussion.

It should be noted this is nowhere close to them admitting anything.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

originally posted by: Ksihkehe
a reply to: StrangeCottageCheese

This was already posted and there was some discussion.

It should be noted this is nowhere close to them admitting anything.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Thanks, I did a search and nothing turned up... that said, I think that thread is way more comprehensive; I'll gladly point people there.

Re. the title: you're entitled to your opinion.

a reply to: StrangeCottageCheese

It's an Op-ed that was imported from SNI, it's not peer reviewed and the contents aren't endorsed by NIH.

CONCLUSIONS
We are all living through one of the most drastic changes in our culture, economic system, as well as political system in our nation’s history as well as the rest of the world. We have been told that we will never return to “normal” and that a great reset has been designed to create a “new world order”. This has all been outlined by Klaus Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum, in his book on the “Great Reset”.[66] This book gives a great deal of insight as to the thinking of the utopians who are proud to claim this pandemic “crisis” as their way to usher in a new world.

a reply to: StrangeCottageCheese


the quiet part out loud

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: StrangeCottageCheese

It's an Op-ed that was imported from SNI, it's not peer reviewed and the contents aren't endorsed by NIH.

Thanks for your input, Aaargh - glad the title caught your attention.

a reply to: StrangeCottageCheese

And thanks to everyone else (you got starred)... just thought it was interesting finding such a scathing article on an NIH site; was wondering about your takes...

That said, in the ATS spirit...

Here's that link to the existing thread, again:

Thread

originally posted by: StrangeCottageCheese
a reply to: StrangeCottageCheese

And thanks to everyone else (you got starred)... just thought it was interesting finding such a scathing article on an NIH site; was wondering about your takes...

That said, in the ATS spirit...

Here's that link to the existing thread, again:

Thread

The NIH site isn't an echo chamber, at least not entirely. There are quite a few combative or contradictory articles on it.

The important thing that we, as members of a conspiracy forum, distinguish between the different types of articles that it contains and we report on them responsibly. Not trying to make out that they're something that they aren't or that they contain things that they don't.

originally posted by: network dude

CONCLUSIONS
We are all living through one of the most drastic changes in our culture, economic system, as well as political system in our nation’s history as well as the rest of the world. We have been told that we will never return to “normal” and that a great reset has been designed to create a “new world order”. This has all been outlined by Klaus Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum, in his book on the “Great Reset”.[66] This book gives a great deal of insight as to the thinking of the utopians who are proud to claim this pandemic “crisis” as their way to usher in a new world.

a reply to: StrangeCottageCheese


the quiet part out loud

These events look quite different when you view them from a non-American perspective.

It's less a Great reset and more of an American reset.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: network dude

CONCLUSIONS
We are all living through one of the most drastic changes in our culture, economic system, as well as political system in our nation’s history as well as the rest of the world. We have been told that we will never return to “normal” and that a great reset has been designed to create a “new world order”. This has all been outlined by Klaus Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum, in his book on the “Great Reset”.[66] This book gives a great deal of insight as to the thinking of the utopians who are proud to claim this pandemic “crisis” as their way to usher in a new world.

a reply to: StrangeCottageCheese


the quiet part out loud

These events look quite different when you view them from a non-American perspective.

It's less a Great reset and more of an American reset.

Yes, and the scientific perspective is dissimilar to both.

Both the perspectives of this event as an American and non-American are really irrelevant. The perceived intent and goals have no bearing on the functional results of these policies. They were a gross failure.

You're not explaining away being completely wrong by saying perceptions are different. Perceptions may be different, but the science remains the same.

Feel free to resumed the other thread. You may want to do some damage control before people go to browse it.

originally posted by: StrangeCottageCheese

originally posted by: Ksihkehe
a reply to: StrangeCottageCheese

This was already posted and there was some discussion.

It should be noted this is nowhere close to them admitting anything.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Thanks, I did a search and nothing turned up... that said, I think that thread is way more comprehensive; I'll gladly point people there.

Re. the title: you're entitled to your opinion.

I think the article is worth reposting. If nothing else this will expose more people to it.

It's not my opinion. It's literally stated at your link that it's not the opinion of anybody except the authors.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Journal or its management.

originally posted by: StrangeCottageCheese

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: StrangeCottageCheese

It's an Op-ed that was imported from SNI, it's not peer reviewed and the contents aren't endorsed by NIH.

Thanks for your input, Aaargh - glad the title caught your attention.

You must be new here

I'm a fairly reasonable sentience but if the people that instigated and went along with the "covid" fiasco were confined to quarters for the remainder of their sad lives it would be some flavor of just.

I suppose it could be seen as an expensive lesson about naked emperors... but jeebus.

originally posted by: asabuvsobelow
a reply to: StrangeCottageCheese

Russell L. Blaylock


This is a link to the Author of the Paper , you know just in case people start attacking his credentials.

Allegations of health dangers
Blaylock claims the supposed toxicity of numerous substances that according to scientific studies are safe at customary exposure levels. He has been quoted several times in media outlets regarding his position that MSG is toxic to the brain.[10][11][12] He also states that the widely used artificial sweetener aspartame is toxic[13][14] and may be the cause of multiple sclerosis.[15] He has additionally cautioned against heavy use of the artificial sweetener Splenda (sucralose).[16] These positions are not supported by scientific consensus or regulatory bodies, as extensive studies support the safety of aspartame, sucralose, and MSG.[2][3][17]

Views on politics
Blaylock has called the American medical system 'collectivist' and has suggested that health-care reform efforts under President Obama were masterminded by extragovernmental groups that wish to impose euthanasia.[18] He blamed the purported collectivism of American medicine for the retirement of his friend Miguel Faria. According to Blaylock, the former Soviet Union tried to spread collectivism by covertly introducing illegal drugs and various sexually transmitted diseases into the United States.[18] Schwarcz characterized these positions as "conspiracy theories."[18]

Yeah, this guy is a conspiracy theorist, and the things you all take as gospel are simply his opinions. In other words, he is a hack who should not be taken seriously.

a reply to: ChiefD

Yeah, this guy is a conspiracy theorist, and the things you all take as gospel are simply his opinions. In other words, he is a hack who should not be taken seriously.

Well look at you you read some Wikipedia and just go along with the Program , Aren't you a good little sheep.

Maybe Draw your own conclusions yes ?

The link was provided to show his medical expertise in Neurology , not collar him a conspiracy theorist mate anyone that goes against the Medical grain is called a conspiracy theorist.

wake up , grow up enter the light of free thought.

originally posted by: Ksihkehe
a reply to: StrangeCottageCheese

This was already posted and there was some discussion.

It should be noted this is nowhere close to them admitting anything.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Closed.