It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A mother who ran into Robb Elementary School to rescue her two children during the Uvalde school shooting accused law enforcement of threatening her to keep her from telling her story to the press.
Angeli Gomez said she was threatened by an officer who warned she would be charged with "obstruction of justice" if she did not stop telling her story. The charge would have serious consequences because she was on probation for a crime she said she committed nearly 10 years ago. She added that a local judge said there would be no legal repercussions for telling her story.
"You could hear the gunshots," Gomez said. "There was not one officer inside the school while I ran to my second son's class. There was not one officer. They could have saved many more lives. They could have gone into that classroom...they could have done something."
The shifting narrative about the law enforcement response to the Uvalde school massacre leaves one dizzy and frustrated. Every day seems to bring a troubling revelation. Police records can help the public piece together what happened at the school, but we are worried that a state law might block efforts to get at the whole truth.
The actions by Chief Arredondo and the array of officers he suddenly directed — which grew to number more than 140, from local, state and federal agencies, including state troopers, sheriff’s deputies, constables and game wardens — are now the subject of overlapping investigations by the Texas Rangers, the Justice Department and the local district attorney’s office.
In cases where a shooting drags on, and more experienced departments establish themselves at the scene, control may sometimes be handed over to a larger department. That did not happen in Uvalde, officials have said.
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
Sounds like the police chief who made the decision to back off, instead of going in, is still calling the shots and trying to save his own skin.
It’s an absolute disgrace! Why hasn’t he resigned or been stood down already?
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
Sounds like the police chief who made the decision to back off, instead of going in, is still calling the shots and trying to save his own skin.
It’s an absolute disgrace! Why hasn’t he resigned or been stood down already?
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
Sounds like the police chief who made the decision to back off, instead of going in, is still calling the shots and trying to save his own skin.
It’s an absolute disgrace! Why hasn’t he resigned or been stood down already?
originally posted by: jarsue97
a reply to: infolurker
There are the Broward Cowards and now these effing cowardly clowns. They allowed children to be killed. All those onscene should be forced to turn in their badges and the Coward school chief of police, who just took a seat on their city council, shouls be put in stocks in the public square and then run out of town.
originally posted by: sarahvital
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
Sounds like the police chief who made the decision to back off, instead of going in, is still calling the shots and trying to save his own skin.
It’s an absolute disgrace! Why hasn’t he resigned or been stood down already?
i heard he is on the city council now.
no idea how or why...
anyone else hear that?