MSNBC Guest Declares Original Purpose Of Second Amendment? Preserve White Supremacy And Slavery

The smear hatred for the constitution and its Amendments are full in display by MSNBC news with their guests.
Who use race to their talking points.

A MSNBC guest had claimed that the original purpose of the Second Amendment was preserve White Supremacy and Slavery.
If only such guests had actually read historical points about the Amendment.

The original purpose of the Second Amendment was never to preserve White Supremacy but to fight a tyrannical government. Its what the original creators of the Second Amendment had said.

Politicians swear upon the Constitution that they would protect the Constitution and the nation not try to force to change the parts of the Constitution.


MSNBC Guest Declares Original Purpose Of Second Amendment? Preserve White Supremacy And Slavery

If the democrats are successful their liberals allies in Chile just did a total gun ban in Chile.
They could try it in the states.


This whole notion of "White Supremacy" is nonsense.

I don’t think that MSNBC host knows their history when 17 white men broke into an arsenal to start a slave revolt to free the slaves. I wonder if those men and the 7 African Americans were all white supremicists that died trying to get get firearms. Or the 300,000 union soldiers who died in the civil war freeing the slaves. We’re they white supremicists too?

John Brown's raid on Harpers Ferry[nb 1] was an effort by abolitionist John Brown, from October 16 to 18, 1859, to initiate a slave revolt in Southern states by taking over the United States arsenal at Harpers Ferry, Virginia (since 1863, West Virginia). It has been called the dress rehearsal for, or Tragic Prelude to the Civil War.[3]: 5 

a reply to: Brassmonkey

John Brown's raid on Harpers Ferry[nb 1] was an effort by abolitionist John Brown, from October 16 to 18, 1859, to initiate a slave revolt in Southern states by taking over the United States arsenal at Harpers Ferry, Virginia (since 1863, West Virginia). It has been called the dress rehearsal for, or Tragic Prelude to the Civil War.[3]: 5 

Interesting that part of history is something i didn't know until recently.
That is something that they dont teach you.

I bet also that CNN,MSNBC nor the media would ever share the history how there were also White European who were also slaves? not only slaves but also slaves to the Ottoman empire and pirates which had been happening in Europe for a decade.

That had been selling and trading off White European Slaves in other countries.

a reply to: vNex92

Another thing they don’t teach that John Brown was executed for Treason…against the Commonwealth of Virginia.

Everything is racist to the cucks at MSDNC. The sad part is, all the libtards hear from there echo chambers reinforces their delusional view of history and today. I think we are past trying to wake up the masses and should start preparing for an eventual clash of cultures. A culture war so to speak. Meme them till they cry and then make memes of them crying.

a reply to: vNex92

You can’t fix stupid Liberals.

Give it another month or two. They'll tie in something like, "Assault weapons prevent a woman's Right to Choose" or something like that.

Racism, guns, and abortion is the Democratic platform for 2022. Just ignore jobs, the economy, and international affairs.

a reply to: vNex92

Any attempt by this administration / Democrats to pull a gun grab will result in a civil war. The reason MSNBC is doing this is to carry water for the Democrats and nothing more. I always find it odd that we have a series of mass shootings and they always occur when Dems are trying to restrict the 2nd amendment.

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: vNex92

Any attempt by this administration / Democrats to pull a gun grab will result in a civil war. The reason MSNBC is doing this is to carry water for the Democrats and nothing more. I always find it odd that we have a series of mass shootings and they always occur when Dems are trying to restrict the 2nd amendment.

I agree, by the way arent you following what happened in Chile? its quite a mess.
They did what the democrats want to do a complete total gun ban.

a reply to: vNex92

I have not been following it. I am not familiar with the laws of Chile, especially their gun laws. I also have no idea what the guiding document (constitution etc) says about the topic.

Democrats have tried different ways to do a gun grab in the US and each and every time its a no go. Obama tried to get creative when he tried to sign the US onto a UN "law" that would restrict the purchase and owning of any firearm by civilians.

For being a Con law "expert" he sure is stupid and if he actually knew what he was talking about he would know a foreign treaty the US signs onto can NOT confer any powers or remove / restrict our Constitutional rights (Scotus ruling in the head money cases - The case established the precedent that treaties, which are described in the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution as "the supreme law of the land" equal to any domestic federal law, do not hold a privileged position above other acts of Congress. Hence, other laws affecting the "enforcement, modification, or repeal" of treaties are legitimate - 112 U.S. 580 (1884), also referred to as Edye v. Robertson).

originally posted by: vNex92
I agree,

If you will excuse me I need to go outside to check if the world is ending


I guess there is a first time for everything.

a reply to: Xcathdra

I really don't think they need to ban guns, why fight the second amendment. Instead, ban reloading tools, and mandate that every bullet made requires a serial number on the bullet and cartridge, then also require that each bullet be entered into a database, and put a 10 dollar tax on each bullet. They accomplish the same thing in a next stage way, as it forces bullet manufacturers out of the country, which then will force gun manufacturers out of the country. While that is being implemented, add a 10,000 dollar tax to each gun imported to the USA. This basically eliminates weapons from out of the country. That means you are left with the current weapons, and you have gun control. If you can afford a gun, sure you can still get one. So mission accomplished, and realistically if your a criminal, you are still going to do the same old same old, and nothing changes, except the fact that you may have less school shootings as a result. That said though, you raise the street price on guns, which means that criminals are going to be more choosy on who they sell their guns too, and you leave the guns in the cartels, vs the run of the mill criminal. You don't boil a toad immediately, start with cold water and warm it up slowly

Camain

a reply to: Xcathdra

Anyone else notice that between jan 20, 2017 and jan 20, 2021, we were not having these types of shootings...except in places like Chicago? There were some, but not like the past few weeks. Don't know what changec.

originally posted by: theatreboy
a reply to: Xcathdra

Anyone else notice that between jan 20, 2017 and jan 20, 2021, we were not having these types of shootings...except in places like Chicago? There were some, but not like the past few weeks. Don't know what changec.

Most of us noticed .
Midterms are coming up, and the party in control wants to ban firearms.
They have no problem breaking laws and getting people killed to further their agenda.

Democrats. I shake my head at you in profound disappointment.

You just don't get it.

a reply to: vNex92

Yep the attacks on the US constitutions are starting, now no longer on the side lines, the goal of the communist in power is to destroy the constitution in order to destroy the nation.

This what 80 m Americans vote for or that is what we are told.

Yep get ready because more communist are going to push for this, the constitution of the US will declared unconstitutional, old and a danger to citizens and the woke idiots will be applauding all this.

a reply to: lordcomac

My husband and I were noticing this too, it seems that killings are center stage during the communist democrats in power, meanwhile most of the dead by drive by shootings are usually in democrat hell holes and nobody say anything.

No longer interesting, just a darn agenda by the communist in power as usual.

originally posted by: camain
a reply to: Xcathdra

I really don't think they need to ban guns, why fight the second amendment. Instead, ban reloading tools, and mandate that every bullet made requires a serial number on the bullet and cartridge, then also require that each bullet be entered into a database,

You do know that the bad guys almost always obliterate serial numbers from their weaponry, right? Also, it's possible to load your own ammunition

originally posted by: camain
and put a 10 dollar tax on each bullet. They accomplish the same thing in a next stage way, as it forces bullet manufacturers out of the country, which then will force gun manufacturers out of the country. While that is being implemented, add a 10,000 dollar tax to each gun imported to the USA. This basically eliminates weapons from out of the country. That means you are left with the current weapons, and you have gun control.

Self-assembled 80-20 platforms will get around this tax. Also, the Mexican Cartels love this idea, unless maybe we think they fill out 1099s/1040s to the IRS? This will mushroom the black market gun import business by a few orders of magnitude.

originally posted by: camain
If you can afford a gun, sure you can still get one.

This will disproportionately impact certain demographics that are more prone to living in poverty, who just might be honest, hard working folks that want a weapon to defend their family.

originally posted by: camain
So mission accomplished, and realistically if your a criminal, you are still going to do the same old same old, and nothing changes, except the fact that you may have less school shootings as a result. That said though, you raise the street price on guns, which means that criminals are going to be more choosy on who they sell their guns too, and you leave the guns in the cartels, vs the run of the mill criminal. You don't boil a toad immediately, start with cold water and warm it up slowly

Camain

This sounds like a really bad idea if the intent is to increase transparency of gun sales. Levying massive sales tax are just going to force the business completely under ground.

It makes 0 sense to create legislation or taxes with the intent of changing the behavior of criminals. By definition, criminals are people that break the laws. So adding more legal barriers does nothing to deter them, just imposes more difficulty on honest, law-abiding people.

But then again, cracking down on "criminal" gun offenders isn't really a priority for the gun grabbers. If it was, they would enforce the existing laws on illegal gun possession.

a reply to: camain

Because all you suggested violates the Heller ruling. Dems have tried several time to bypass the 2nd amendment by targeting bullets and it has not worked for them either.