FBI Maintains Workspace And Computer Portal Within Clinton/DNC Law Firm

While everyone is distracted over the Sussman verdict, which had the jury stacked with Clinton and AOC donors, HRC and her legal team admitted to hosting a FBI workspace within their own office. This means access to FBI databases exists inside the office of the DNC and Clinton legal group. Here is a case in point example of the deep state in action. There are no limits to what they can access or get away with. And of course, there's no way to stop the corruption when your own government is compromised like this.

In response to a letter sent by Rep. Matt Gaetz and Jim Jordan, Perkins Coie, the legal arm of the DNC and Hillary Clinton, admitted they have been operating an FBI workspace in their Washington D.C. office since 2012. Pay attention to that date, it matters.

85% of the FBI and contractor searches are unlawful.

Many of those searches involved the use of the “same identifiers over different data ranges.” Put in plain terms, the same people were continually being tracked, searched and surveilled by querying the FBI database over time.

The non-compliant searches go back to 2012. The same date mentioned for the FBI portal to begin operating inside the Perkins Coie office.

Assuming it's even "FBI" or "contractors" who are typing the searches in. Could it be that HRC just walks in and does her own searches there?

SOURCE

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Wouldn't an FBI computer work station use FBI codes?
If Sussman managed the station...wouldn't he have the codes?
Sounds like a major security nightmare.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

The reasoning Sussman was acquitted was because there was information already held by the FBI.

Ok, so hes innocent which concludes FBI collusion.

So, here we are again with in your face two tiered justice.

Like with Clinton
Like with Maxwell.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

The reasoning Sussman was acquitted was because there was information already held by the FBI.

Ok, so hes innocent which concludes FBI collusion.

So, here we are again with in your face two tiered justice.

Like with Clinton
Like with Maxwell.

This is the deep states the radical left supports.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Wouldn't an FBI computer work station use FBI codes?
If Sussman managed the station...wouldn't he have the codes?
Sounds like a major security nightmare.

Hillary was very assertive and could intimidate almost any FBI worker if she wanted to. She is an alpha female. She would probably even threaten anyone with firing that didn't do what she asked. Even good old Bill is probably afraid of her.

Obama politically weaponized the leadership of the FBI, installed his corrupt people to do so.

The line level FBI agents, the boots on the ground need to rise up enmasse against the corrupt leadership.

Didn’t Perkins Coie also represent an illegal alien that stole an election a bunch’a years back… nah… couldn’t be the same people…

originally posted by: choomsuba
Obama politically weaponized the leadership of the FBI, installed his corrupt people to do so.

The line level FBI agents, the boots on the ground need to rise up enmasse against the corrupt leadership.

This seems to be brought up from time to time:

...but you know there are still good agents in the FBI!

Bullspit.

SHOW US instead of telling us, and start by making the FBI APOLITICAL, as it should be. That means no "branch offices" !?!? in political head quarters, Republican, Democrat, any party.

Good party members are fond of telling people the DNC "is a private organization" (this was the rationale for ad hoc changing rules to keep Bernie from the nomination before they simply bought him off), so I ask then: what would be the public response of an FBI office inside Facebook (their are probably covert feds their just to gather intel, but I digress), HP, Disney, Google, pick your corporation. Then why is it ok for any political party to host the FBI on premises?

It's funny to read all of the Russia bashing on here when we are well on our way to becoming another U.S.S.A.

originally posted by: SwissMarked
Didn’t Perkins Coie also represent an illegal alien that stole an election a bunch’a years back… nah… couldn’t be the same people…

They're involved with a great many things. Many things which may never come to light.

They're involved in everything from manipulating elections to securities fraud.

They're deeply connected to corruption at the highest levels in the US. I wonder if it's possible to be involved in those circles without allowing yourself to be caught up in the criminality. I doubt they tolerate non-participants having a seat at the table.

I suspect there are weeks of dot connecting that a deep dive into their connections would merit, with weeks more connecting federal policy moves to certain people and meetings. High level connections to career bureaucrats running agencies with sweeping powers, what could go wrong?

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Even in an FBI office, each computer would require a logon and password, and access to individual FBI online systems would also require separate ID's and passwords, especially in open plan offices.

Non-security related businesses have had that default level of security, for at least the last decade.

Do you log on to your personal computer?

originally posted by: choomsuba
Obama politically weaponized the leadership of the FBI, installed his corrupt people to do so.

The line level FBI agents, the boots on the ground need to rise up enmasse against the corrupt leadership.

Didn't Trump fire Comey?

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Even in an FBI office, each computer would require a logon and password, and access to individual FBI online systems would also require separate ID's and passwords, especially in open plan offices.

Non-security related businesses have had that default level of security, for at least the last decade.

Do you log on to your personal computer?

You literally know zero about IT security, so don't even try.

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Even in an FBI office, each computer would require a logon and password, and access to individual FBI online systems would also require separate ID's and passwords, especially in open plan offices.

Non-security related businesses have had that default level of security, for at least the last decade.

Do you log on to your personal computer?

THIS is Hillary we are talking about. Not like she ever ran illegal servers before now is it?

Being retired FBI, this doesn't make any sense that they would put a SCIF ( if they did ) in a private law firm.

Something doesn't pass the smell test.

There would be an electronic audit trail of everyone who accessed the SCIF. Everything that is downloaded in a SCIF is identified by user ID, the time of the download and what was downloaded, been that way since 2006.

The building itself has to meet requirements. Open storage of Secret material would require modifications to comply.

Hell, even in an regular FBI building, if I accessed something I had no business accessing, there would be questions from CSO (Chief Security Officer)

originally posted by: RickinVa
Being retired FBI, this doesn't make any sense that they would put a SCIF in a private law firm.

Something doesn't pass the smell test.

There would be an electronic audit trail of everyone who accessed the SCIF. Everything that is downloaded in a SCIF is identified by user ID, the time of the download and what was downloaded, been that way since 2006.

There's actually an agency whose job is to certify SCIFs, they must meet certain requirements (hinges, signal jammers) and if there's an agency, that means there's a paper trail, the right foia request could uncover such a thing, good point though.

a reply to: JinMI

The reason he was acquitted was because the Jury thought it never should have gone to trial. They said as much. Whether he did it or not did not matter to them.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

That quote didnt go unnoticed.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Even in an FBI office, each computer would require a logon and password, and access to individual FBI online systems would also require separate ID's and passwords, especially in open plan offices.

Non-security related businesses have had that default level of security, for at least the last decade.

Do you log on to your personal computer?

You literally know zero about IT security, so don't even try.

How could you possibly know my credentials? LOL.

The DNC were hacked. The FBI were called in.

It is standard best practice in data security for the 'cleanup IT' people to install a standalone 'monitoring PC' or device that looks for any remaining suspicious activity, code, or compromise, on the network.

In the case of the FBI at the DNC, I believe that PC was running CrowdStrike's Falcon monitoring software.

The VLAN's being monitored have full trust of the monitoring device, but the monitoring device has no trust of the VLAN's being monitored. So, the hacked networks can't access the monitoring PC and it stays safe and inviolate while scanning them deeply, not only their static files, but metadata, logs, executing code, active sessions, and memory space.

My guess is that this is what is being referred to by the article, but the article has no technical detail and was merely an inference of something a Republican senator alleges, so probably no-one there had an idea what they were talking about, either.

originally posted by: hangedman13

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Even in an FBI office, each computer would require a logon and password, and access to individual FBI online systems would also require separate ID's and passwords, especially in open plan offices.

Non-security related businesses have had that default level of security, for at least the last decade.

Do you log on to your personal computer?

THIS is Hillary we are talking about. Not like she ever ran illegal servers before now is it?

Please provide a link to any statutory US law, state or federal, that makes the running of a server illegal?

LOL.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: hangedman13

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Even in an FBI office, each computer would require a logon and password, and access to individual FBI online systems would also require separate ID's and passwords, especially in open plan offices.

Non-security related businesses have had that default level of security, for at least the last decade.

Do you log on to your personal computer?

THIS is Hillary we are talking about. Not like she ever ran illegal servers before now is it?

Please provide a link to any statutory US law, state or federal, that makes the running of a server illegal?

LOL.

She had classified state department emails on a personal laptop and instead of turning them over she smashed the laptop and poured bleach on it. If that doesn't scream guilty to you, well you must be deaf.