It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: scraedtosleep
Don't know about cattle vs insects but yeast has got to be one of the most efficient sources of protein.
It is a complete protein, lends itself to industrial processing, it is already a thing and doesn't have as much of a yuck factor as insects do.
originally posted by: Charliebrowndog
a reply to: scraedtosleep
No, I am not stating it as fact more of a question that I don't know. I think insects can be and are a viable dietary source in some instances.
My argument is lets say you take a pound of beef how many insects are needed to equate to the same caloric values of that beef and what does it take to provide that many insects? I don't know the answer and would be interested to know and I would assume that different insects would be different as well such as crickets vs meal worms.
Is it feasible for a school to offer the same type of caloric needs when compared with lets say beef in the example or would it take a bunch of insects like several boxes and what is that cost when compared to beef?
I cannot find a story regarding this but i am assuming the insects being grown for this are being grown in some kind of lab environment and not in uncle Jim's garage so there would be some cost to that which could be difficult to track if it is a large lab.
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
But does it taste good?
And bring variety of dishes?
originally posted by: TheAlleghenyGentleman
a reply to: rickymouse
Love snails. Love shrimp. I also like crunchy insects.
If it’s fried even better.
I have had the classic chocolate ants. Delish.
I don’t think I could eat balut.
I think that is definitely my line.