They Used a Tragedy To Push Against The 2nd Amendment, They are failing to keep the Oath

Just like the previous shootings and tragedies the far left are always trying to find ways to use gun violence tragedies as a means to push their open opt agendas.

Democrats and other politicians Swear an oath on the constitution which they are now trying to break
Before been sworn in as president or any high office.
You must be making an oath to the constitution and bible which many now are trying to break or change the constitution.

The Oath, as stated in Article II, Section I, Clause 8 of the U.S. Constitution, is as follows: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

Joe Biden and his admin had been making statements how 2nd Amendment was never absolute. You had made an oath that you would not only protect the US but the the Constitution of the United States not to change or break it.

There many liberals and some on the right who had breaking this oath.

Biden on 9mm ammo: "2nd Amendment was never absolute."

a reply to: vNex92

There hasn't been a Politically motivated or School shooting in the past 20 years that the Left didn't immediately bring up Gun Control.

and Yet we never hear about the constant Murder and Shootings in there Cities , Chicago , LA , Atlanta , New York, New-Orleans , Dallas etc etc etc , They are in charge in all of these cities there laws are well in place.

a reply to: asabuvsobelow

The Biden admin and Biden needed a distraction from Inflation/Economy and Ukraine.
I expect they would be talking about how cops are bad and need to be defunded for couple of weeks now.

and Yet we never hear about the constant Murder and Shootings in there Cities , Chicago

Exactly! and why would MSM never discuss the weekly murder and shootings in the most law oriented cities like Chicago where crime is weekly? it would likely hurt the democrat's message on gun control.


The democrats, Liberals are already claiming how many more children have to die in order for their gun control to pass?

Could be worse you could be in Canada no vaccine no travel and today legislation to prohibit hand guns has been introduced

a reply to: vNex92

Most Americans are aware that there are now over 20,000 gun-caused deaths in America every year.

Source: www.gunviolencearchive.org...

Most Americans understand that Democrats only whine about guns when a tiny fraction of those 20,000 annual deaths happen in a single incident.

Democrats are fading in authority and relevancy. In 12 months, their influence in this country will be at a historic low...thank goodness.

They're not only Using a Tragedy
They're Using a Tragedy they Orchestrated

To much hokey stuff
with these last 3 shootings
like they happened just for this purpose
to be used.

a reply to: vNex92

In another thread I mentioned that there's essentially no record of school shootings America before the mid 1990's ( outside of 3 cases spread out over the 100 years prior.)

This is what the great William Cooper said in 1991:

The sharp increase of prescriptions of psychoactive drugs like Prozac and Ritalin to younger and younger children will inevitably lead to a rash of horrific school shootings.” These incidents, he said, “will be used by elements of the federal government as an excuse to infringe upon the citizenry’s Second Amendment rights.”

Oh my! What are all of the ardent constitution supporters at? Are they going to defend the constitution if it is amended to no longer protect us from the government outlawing gun ownership?

How would a supporter do that with pieces of paper that have failed to keep the government in check?

Are they just going to cherry pick? Say it's not the same? That they only swore an oath to the version that existed when they joined the military?

Who's going to stop this madness? Should we do, as one member told me was "the sanest idea I ever had," and just do nothing but complain and shout at our TVs and computers while the government just further ignores and further disregards what the Constitution is supposed to symbolize?

When the majority of the population votes on feelings, and can't be bother to look into politicians pasts? When our supposed representatives don't ask for our input or even consider it when given, but instead the money that comes from lobbyists?

Representative democracy my ass. More like an illusion while we are kept in an agreeable trance of consumerism and vices. Keep believing and having faith in an institution that has long been a failure. It's not like that's exactly how we wound up where we are today. Right?

We work and toil, hoping that one day we'll be able to retire, yet most of our politicians can't be bothered to return the money they take from us or help us out. Evem the ones make an attempt to convince us that they care get shouted down as socialists, liberals, and communists who want to destroy America when the people in power have long been doing that regardless, and instead line their own pockets and send millions, even billions to provide weaponry and other tools of war to destroy other people's lives.

The people strive for authoritarianism. They crave it. They need to be told how to feel and how to think. There are politician spewing calls to their side of every flavor.

This system is flawed, and it's likely only going to get worse before something else takes over.

And the whole while mpst people will be more than contempt wishing for some patriotic heroes with no flaws to come and save them as they do nothing but complain and shout at their devices subconsciously aware thet they lack the will to actually do anything their fantasy heroes could do for them.

a reply to: AutomateThis1v2

The people strive for authoritarianism. They crave it. They need to be told how to feel and how to think.

Congratulations.
You have just described the Progressive Liberal of the US .

originally posted by: vNex92
Just like the previous shootings and tragedies the far left are always trying to find ways to use gun violence tragedies as a means to push their open opt agendas.

Democrats and other politicians Swear an oath on the constitution which they are now trying to break
Before been sworn in as president or any high office.
You must be making an oath to the constitution and bible which many now are trying to break or change the constitution.

The Oath, as stated in Article II, Section I, Clause 8 of the U.S. Constitution, is as follows: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

Joe Biden and his admin had been making statements how 2nd Amendment was never absolute. You had made an oath that you would not only protect the US but the the Constitution of the United States not to change or break it.

There many liberals and some on the right who had breaking this oath.

Biden on 9mm ammo: "2nd Amendment was never absolute."

Think about it. THEY cannot bring the USA down from the outside, only from the inside. How can they do that? They have to weaken your moral fibre, your family values, your self belief and then divide you into ‘sides’. The next step will surely be some sort of damaging armed conflict, civil war if you will. Everything is going to plan.

But the C.O.T.U.S. "is not absolute".... "Nobody could purchase a cannon when it was written". ... "A 9mm bullet can blow lungs out of a body".

That is the point OP. By saying it, the (C.O.T.U.S) is not an "absolute". They, in their mind, relieve themselves of any oath or duty to defend it. So it is not our "constitution" they work for.
Which makes me wonder? Who's constitution do they want?

And if the 2nd. Amendment isn't absolute?
What other part of the B.O.R. isn't "absolute?

Most people do not know that the C.O.T.U.S. wasn't going to be ratified by the sovereign states, unless the B.O.R. was agreed to. That's why they're called "amendments". The U.S.A. is a "Constitutional Republic" not a "Democracy". The majority has no say when it comes to the "absolutes" of the B.O.R..

"The Founders" weren't stupid. They codified into a "law" (A Constitution). Your individual right to say, "Go F Yourself". With the 1st. Amendment.

And with the 2nd. Amendment?... They gave us the ability to, make it happen. By "law". It has nothing to do with "needs" or "hunting".

Anybody that is trying to change that? Is a traitor and would be better off, not making, or taking "oaths".

Because they have no CONSTITUTION.

There are millions of responsible gun owners in America.

It's the nutjobs who cause the outrage.

Texas Law allowed this kid to get two weapons with little to no oversight, no background checks and no waiting period.

I'm pro 2nd Amendment, but I'm also heavily invested in protocols that don't allow impulse purchases without screening for mentally unstable individuals who just suddenly "need to take care of something".

I don't think forcing law abiding and responsible gun owners to surrender their firearms is the solution.

Once again, they've overreacted with emotion rather than reason and logic.

originally posted by: Gothmog
a reply to: AutomateThis1v2

The people strive for authoritarianism. They crave it. They need to be told how to feel and how to think.

Congratulations.
You have just described the Progressive Liberal of the US .

Point proven.

originally posted by: AutomateThis1v2

originally posted by: Gothmog
a reply to: AutomateThis1v2

The people strive for authoritarianism. They crave it. They need to be told how to feel and how to think.

Congratulations.
You have just described the Progressive Liberal of the US .

Point proven.

Didn't need a verification .
I used tp be one .

a reply to: AgarthaSeed

Discipline or rather the lack of, is the problem of our children. Along with respect for life - their own and others.

The only thing 'great' about Milton Cooper, is we didn't have to watch a trial, because the other deputy put him down. The guy was a nut. His last moments in this realm is all the proof you need.

a reply to: GENERAL EYES

Once again, they've overreacted with emotion rather than reason and logic.

Like as they did with the covid lockdowns, travel restrictions.
While the politicians still fly in their private jets don't follow what they preach.

The establishment is petrified that Americans are secretly amassing the tools and volunteers to commandeer their operations at any cost. By resisting the anti gun propaganda and closing ranks around our vestiges of liberty, we prove to them that's exactly what's happening.

a reply to: TzarChasm

Remember if they are successful going after the The 2nd Amendment they will target and go after the first by suggesting how they need to protect speech and minorities, "Free Speech has consequences" their own exact words.

a reply to: vNex92

Notice how they said "consequences" and not "victims". They're talking about inconvenient facts that are corrosive to the carefully scripted circus production. Like pouring marbles under one of those cute dragon costumes to watch it dance until the guys inside of it get mad.