Gene-editing experiment turns fluffy hamsters into ‘aggressive’ mutant rage monsters

This is very important as it relates to mRNA vaccines. When the Government and scientist try to act like they fully understand these things, they're lying. They're editing DNA. This is opening a Pandora's box that they will not be able to close.

Gene-editing experiment turns fluffy hamsters into ‘aggressive’ mutant rage monsters

A team of scientists in the US have accidentally created overly-aggressive mutant hamsters following a gene-editing experiment.

Using the controversial CRISPR technology, researchers at Northwestern University were examining a hormone called vasopressin and its receptor, Avpr1a.

They opted to try and remove the latter from a group of Syrian hamsters, with the expectation it would increase bonding and co-operation between the lovable little critters.

That’s because Avpr1a is understood to regulate things like teamwork and friendship as well as dominance and bonding.

Their expectation proved to be wrong. Very wrong.

‘We were really surprised at the results,’ said Professor H Elliot Albers, the lead researcher on the study.

‘We anticipated that if we eliminated vasopressin activity, we would reduce both aggression and social communication.

‘But the opposite happened.’

The academics found the adorable bundles of fluff turned into mutant rage monsters exhibiting ‘high levels of aggression towards other same-sex individuals’.

link

This is because how sequences in what was called junk DNA, which is no longer seen as junk, regulate the expression of genes is not understood. So it's a crap shoot. You think Avpr1a will make hamsters bond more but it turns them into aggresive mutants.

Imagine if this mistake occurs with humans and a mRNA vaccine. These vaccines use CRISPR also.

The Pfizer and Moderna COVID vaccines are the first vaccines to be activated by mRNA. These vaccines build on the breakthroughs of the gene-editing technology known as CRISPR.

www.npr.org...

The cat is already out of the bag.

The Bible tells us that as in the days of Noah, so shall the coming of the Son of Man be.

In the days of Noah there was genetic manipulation that polluted our genetics. This is why the Bible says Noah was perfect in his generations. Noah was still under Adam's sin, his bloodline and genetics just wasn't polluted by genetic manipulation introduced by the fallen ones or the angels that sinned that's talked about in 2nd Peter.

These fallen ones will return and corrupt and pollute are genetics with their blasphemies. They will get a lot of help from men and women who are already talking about playing god with genetics. Here's a video of Yuval Noah Harari and Klaus Schwab talking about playing god because humans are hackable.



He said humans are now the intelligent designers that can hack our DNA. The article about the mutant hamsters shows humans are not that intelligent because they can do some gene editing that has horrible ramifications for humans and they're not intelligent enough to know what the results of their gene editing will be.

During these end times, their will not be a 3rd Adam. Jesus is called the second Adam because His sacrifice for sin allows our bodies to be transformed into spiritual bodies to escape our corrupted nature. When this genetic corruption happens again, you will be marked with their blasphemies with nobody to save you from that corrupted state.

Thread already existing about this:

Scientists accidentally gene-edit hamsters into meanies

a reply to: TDDAgain

I read that post and it has nothing to do with CRISPR and mRNA vaccines as it relates to the recent COVID vaccine.. That's why I posted it in this thread specifically.

@neoholographic

Read the link

We are doomed. I imagine they will 'accidentally' edit genes in a person to be more aggressive.
Never mind how awful it is what they did to those poor hamsters. They are barbaric and think they are 'God'

originally posted by: ancientlight
We are doomed. I imagine they will 'accidentally' edit genes in a person to be more aggressive.
Never mind how awful it is what they did to those poor hamsters. They are barbaric and think they are 'God'

Good point.

This is because scientist don't fully understand how these sequences regulate expression. So it's a crap shoot.

You can think you're editing out one gene and you don't realize that gene is connected to empathy for example.

So say they give us another vaccine or some other gene therapy and they think this therapy will help depression. They don't realize that the genes they're dealing with are connected to empathy. They then accidently turn people they were helping with depression into sociopaths. Here's an article on this:

Gene Therapy May Be Powerful New Treatment for Major Depression

In a report published in the Oct. 20 issue of Science Translational Medicine, researchers at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center say animal and human data suggest gene therapy to the brain may be able to treat patients with major depression who do not respond to traditional drug treatment.

In 2006, Dr. Greengard and his Rockefeller colleagues discovered that the p11 gene appears to play a key role in depression. They found p11 protein is needed to bring receptors that bind to the neurotransmitter serotonin to the surface of nerve cells. In the brain, serotonin regulates mood, appetite and sleep, among other functions, and most antidepressants seek to regulate serotonin.

"In the absence of p11, a neuron can produce all the serotonin receptors it needs, but they will not be transported to the cell surface and therefore won stick out and latch on to the neurotransmitter," says Dr. Kaplitt.

So the researchers decided to disable function of the p11 gene in mice using a virus which would produce an siRNA -- small pieces of double-stranded RNA -- that blocked the genes expression. Once they showed this could be done, they chose to selectively target p11 expression in the nucleus accumbens brain area because human functional MRI studies at Weill Cornell had shown this area to be particularly affected in depressed patients.

In the current study, he inserted the p11 gene into the virus and delivered them to the nucleus accumbens of the p11-free mice. The treatment effectively reversed depression-like behaviors in the mice.

www.cusabio.com...

So the idea is to increase the levels of p11 in people that are depressed. But we don't know if the decrease of p11 is also associated with the decrease of another protein in humans. So now you have an increase in p11 and the other protein at the same time and that could be disasterous.

The point is, we're a long way from glow in the dark cats.

We understand that we're working with a code that is intelligently designed. It's like a computer code and that's why we can encode things like DVD's and books in DNA.

The problem is, we don't fully understand how sequences of code regulate the expression of our genetics.

It would be like someone that knows HTML messing with something that's coded in Python. They may understand that it's a code but they could easily destroy the expression of the code because they don't know Python.

I wonder why they tried gene splicing when you can do the same thing in humans with a combo of alcohol and steroids.

Gene-editing experiment turns fluffy hamsters into ‘aggressive’ mutant rage monsters

a reply to: neoholographic

When you try to play God it will always end badly.
They're playing with the biological makeup of animals and people while having no clue of the outcome. Madness.
Someone should be slapped.

In-Depth: Study suggests coronavirus infection could alter our DNA

So, bio-engineered or not, a virus can possibly alter who and what we are? Adds a little meat to the theory aliens are our future human selves just visiting their past.

www.10news.com...
[x-default-stgec.uplynk.com... _g.mp4][/url]

Zombie apocalypse anyone?

How many movies have been made about a vaccine that turns people into rage monsters without the ability to really think?

I dont trust this vaccine at all, and ive said from the beginning this thing is being used so that at some point they can "activate" whatever they have put into everyone

Now it might not turn people to Zombies but I still go with the theory that its used as some sort of weapon of compliance, obey or theyll release something that activates whatever hell theyve injected people with

I believe I saw this in a couple of movies .
Didn't end too well for the researchers .
It never does.

It’s all fun and games until a 5ft 1 naked Chinese guy jumps out of the trunk of your car and beats your ass with a crowbar.

Yeah playing with genes that’s about what’s going to happen going to have some shocking unexpected 💩 happen

They often refer to the lab animals as "sacrifices" in their papers

"The term `sacrifice' is used by experimental biologists to describe methods for killing laboratory specimens. In Western societies, `sacrifice' usually connotes a process of `making sacred', a process Durkheim and his followers interpreted as a ritual transformation between `profane' and `sacred' realms."

Sacrifices in the Old Testament were meant to absolve the people's sin. Now they're sacrificing animals so that they themselves can be gods and try to overcome the consequences of sin by material manipulation.

a reply to: cooperton

So true!

We're truly in the days of Noah. We're seeing genetic manipulation especially with CRISPR. These are also things that are in the news. There's much more going on that doesn't make the news. I truly believe there are human clones and the image of the beast might be a clone of someone that was, then was not and yet is. I wrote about it in this thread.

The beast and his image
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Here's some more examples:

Scientists Use Gene Editing to Create Mutant Cockroaches in Breakthrough

Researchers used CRISPR on cockroaches in a first that opens the door to future gene-editing research on insects.

www.vice.com...

Mutant Chickens Grow Teeth

Warning: Mutant chickens may bite. Researchers have identified a genetic mutation that creates incipient teeth in bird embryos. The discovery provides a modern day glimpse of a feature that hasn't been seen in avians for millions of years.

Birds lost their choppers 70 million to 80 million years ago.

The finding is a great example of how altering the location of gene expression can cause changes in body types over time, says biologist Scott Gilbert of Swarthmore College near Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. "The real wow here," adds Paul Sharpe, a biochemist at the Department of Craniofacial Development at Kings College London, "is that these guys essentially show a glimpse of what the teeth probably looked like in the first birds."

www.science.org...

They have made glow in the dark cats:

Cat owners might find a glow-in-the-dark kitty to be fairly useful—you’ll never trip over the cat at night again—but the Mayo Clinic scientists who created this glowing cat had a bigger goal in mind: fighting AIDS.

The substance that makes the cat glow is a version of the green fluorescent protein that lights up the crystal jelly, a type of jellyfish that lives off the West Coast of the United States. Years ago scientists realized that the gene for GFP is a perfect marker when they insert another new gene into an organism. By inserting a version of GFP along with their gene of choice, they could easily see if they were successful because the organism would glow. Since the technique was first developed, researchers have made many glowing animals, including pigs, mice, dogs, even fish you can buy in the pet store.

www.smithsonianmag.com...



They will find some benefits here but the disasters will be much bigger. They have even genetically modified tomatoes to produce vitamin D.

Gene editing enables tomatoes to make ‘sunshine vitamin’

Scientists in the UK have successfully created tomatoes that make large amounts of vitamin D in their leaves and fruit using pioneering gene editing technology.

The researchers used Crispr, the most popular gene editing technology, to make a tiny change in the tomato’s DNA. This greatly increased concentrations in both leaves and fruit of a molecule called provitamin D3. The molecule is then converted through exposure to ultraviolet light or sunshine into D3, the vitamin’s most beneficial form in humans.

www.ft.com...

We're just seeing a small portion of the research being done.

The problem is scientist don't know the code.

For instance, scientist can see a decrease in the p11 protein in patients with depression. They then use CRISPR to increase the levels of p11. They don't know if a decrease of p11 is associated with an increase in other proteins. You now have a case where an increase in p11 and these other proteins at the same time and you don't know what you would be creationg in humans.

What if you mess around with the genes of roaches and you trigger genes that make them venemous?

The point is, they don't know but like I said the cat is already out of the bag.

originally posted by: neoholographic

We're just seeing a small portion of the research being done.

The problem is scientist don't know the code.

For instance, scientist can see a decrease in the p11 protein in patients with depression. They then use CRISPR to increase the levels of p11. They don't know if a decrease of p11 is associated with an increase in other proteins. You now have a case where an increase in p11 and these other proteins at the same time and you don't know what you would be creationg in humans.

What if you mess around with the genes of roaches and you trigger genes that make them venemous?

The point is, they don't know but like I said the cat is already out of the bag.

Yeah exactly. the unseen consequences could be world-shattering. All it takes is one wrong move that creates a super-destructive organism that escapes the lab. Covid was an example of this, luckily it was nowhere near world-ending..