The MSM Is Starting To Admit The mRNA Shots Are A Failure

I find it interesting how they deflect all of these symptoms of vaccination onto something else. The newest one I heard was a commercial for lyme disease which I've heard many times on the radio over the past years. But, the latest version included the symptom of brain fog.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
The avalanche of evidence can't be covered up and censored forever, but it can be memory holed if quietly released and forgotten about as other more "urgent" developments emerge. The fact is, the government absolutely can never admit it was a failure, as that would be political suicide. What they can do is admit that there are some teensy issues with the mRNA shots, and over time move on to the next thing, such as new vaccine, virus, or food shortage, etc.

As Alex Berenson recently discovered, even CNN has started to admit there could be a miniscule issue with these mRNA drugs, where your immunity is progressively lowered over time as you receive more shots. Now, this is something we've covered in numerous threads on here, most of them reference the ONS data showing the vaccinated are slowly acquiring VAIDS. Contrary to what many believe, you can have AIDS without having HIV.

For example, children are 303 times more likely to die following Covid-19 vaccination than unvaccinated children. However, the way CNN presents this fact is much more sugar coated.

From Berenson's op-ed:

CNN just ran a piece explaining that “scientists are urgently trying to solve” the question of whether the endless waves of Covid we now have “may be a result of the mRNA technology used to build some Covid-19 vaccines.”

Oh? You don’t say? Now “scientists” are “urgently trying” to figure out if the “mRNA technology” is the problem and not the solution?

What you’re seeing here is the first steps toward an official acknowledgement that the mRNA vaccines have failed and new vaccines are coming sooner or later.

Booster shots? Remember, booster shots are available everywhere now. SECOND booster shots are available everywhere. And despite endless badgering from media and public health authorities, uptake has been close to zero for months.

The CNN source article can also be found in the op-ed.

SOURCE

So... Now your saying that you trust the MSM, and that this isn't a ploy?

You can't have it both ways.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

The MSM and "top" scientists say you misunderstand, it's not the vaccine killing people, it's "long haul COVID" and the damage from having COVID that's killing people, it has nothing to do with the vaccine. You are just spreading misinformation, malinformation and disinformation.

See problem solved, remember, we are in upside down clown world and facts are not truth, what we are told by the boobtube is truth.

originally posted by: Spacespider
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Vaccinated children have higher mortality rates than the unvaccinated due to the prioritisation of COVID-19 vaccination for clinically vulnerable children.

Vaccinated children have higher mortality than the unvaccinated because they have been injected with bioweapons and the others have not.

It's not rocket science.

originally posted by: nugget1
Every night, all through the news hour there are commercials saying the vaccine has been approved for 6 month trough 5 y/o children and urging parents to get them vaccinated. I cringe every time I see one of these infomercials, and hope parents are doing their homework.

These articles about the new jab approvals for the most defenseless among us made me SMH.

My baby son is ~1. There isn’t a snowballs chance in H E double hockey sticks any of that garbage will be injected in him. Period.

originally posted by: Salander

originally posted by: Spacespider
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Vaccinated children have higher mortality rates than the unvaccinated due to the prioritisation of COVID-19 vaccination for clinically vulnerable children.

Vaccinated children have higher mortality than the unvaccinated because they have been injected with bioweapons and the others have not.

It's not rocket science.

Clearly it is

a reply to: Spacespider

It is rocket science?

originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: v1rtu0s0


Yet again another complete lie of a thread.

The CNN article doesn't say anything at all about the vaccine reducing your imunity or causing anything like AIDS.

And please source your claim for getting AIDS without HIV.

Yet another troll post from a cancer poster. It says drop off in protection which is sugar coating the immunity being reduced.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

Nice deflection from the topic. Care to challenge the actual subject matter?

originally posted by: Spacespider

originally posted by: Salander

originally posted by: Spacespider
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Vaccinated children have higher mortality rates than the unvaccinated due to the prioritisation of COVID-19 vaccination for clinically vulnerable children.

Vaccinated children have higher mortality than the unvaccinated because they have been injected with bioweapons and the others have not.

It's not rocket science.

Clearly it is

303x more likely to die isn't "vulnerable" that's genocide. You don't seem to get it.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: v1rtu0s0


Yet again another complete lie of a thread.

The CNN article doesn't say anything at all about the vaccine reducing your imunity or causing anything like AIDS.

And please source your claim for getting AIDS without HIV.

Yet another troll post from a cancer poster. It says drop off in protection which is sugar coating the immunity being reduced.

Drop off in your protection from fully vaccinated.

Nothing about your immune system or your made up VAIDs.

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: v1rtu0s0


Yet again another complete lie of a thread.

The CNN article doesn't say anything at all about the vaccine reducing your imunity or causing anything like AIDS.

And please source your claim for getting AIDS without HIV.

Yet another troll post from a cancer poster. It says drop off in protection which is sugar coating the immunity being reduced.

Drop off in your protection from fully vaccinated.

Nothing about your immune system or your made up VAIDs.

As I explained, they can't admit that and have to sugar coat it. Stop failing at reading comprehension.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: v1rtu0s0


Yet again another complete lie of a thread.

The CNN article doesn't say anything at all about the vaccine reducing your imunity or causing anything like AIDS.

And please source your claim for getting AIDS without HIV.

Yet another troll post from a cancer poster. It says drop off in protection which is sugar coating the immunity being reduced.

Drop off in your protection from fully vaccinated.

Nothing about your immune system or your made up VAIDs.

As I explained, they can't admit that and have to sugar coat it. Stop failing at reading comprehension.

It doesn't say what you are claiming at all.

You are lying.

My comprehension of that is just fine.

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: v1rtu0s0


Yet again another complete lie of a thread.

The CNN article doesn't say anything at all about the vaccine reducing your imunity or causing anything like AIDS.

And please source your claim for getting AIDS without HIV.

Yet another troll post from a cancer poster. It says drop off in protection which is sugar coating the immunity being reduced.

Drop off in your protection from fully vaccinated.

Nothing about your immune system or your made up VAIDs.

As I explained, they can't admit that and have to sugar coat it. Stop failing at reading comprehension.

It doesn't say what you are claiming at all.

You are lying.

My comprehension of that is just fine.

I'm not wasting my time on your gas lighting and trolling. Buzz off.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: v1rtu0s0


Yet again another complete lie of a thread.

The CNN article doesn't say anything at all about the vaccine reducing your imunity or causing anything like AIDS.

And please source your claim for getting AIDS without HIV.

Yet another troll post from a cancer poster. It says drop off in protection which is sugar coating the immunity being reduced.

Drop off in your protection from fully vaccinated.

Nothing about your immune system or your made up VAIDs.

As I explained, they can't admit that and have to sugar coat it. Stop failing at reading comprehension.

It doesn't say what you are claiming at all.

You are lying.

My comprehension of that is just fine.

I'm not wasting my time on your gas lighting and trolling. Buzz off.

Pointing out lies is neither gas lighting or trolling.

If you can provide any evidence of your claims please do so, otherwise I will just keep pointing out you are lying.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: v1rtu0s0


Yet again another complete lie of a thread.

The CNN article doesn't say anything at all about the vaccine reducing your imunity or causing anything like AIDS.

And please source your claim for getting AIDS without HIV.

Yet another troll post from a cancer poster. It says drop off in protection which is sugar coating the immunity being reduced.

Drop off in your protection from fully vaccinated.

Nothing about your immune system or your made up VAIDs.

As I explained, they can't admit that and have to sugar coat it. Stop failing at reading comprehension.

It doesn't say what you are claiming at all.

You are lying.

My comprehension of that is just fine.

I'm not wasting my time on your gas lighting and trolling. Buzz off.

Pointing out lies is neither gas lighting or trolling.

If you can provide any evidence of your claims please do so, otherwise I will just keep pointing out you are lying.

Wouldn’t claiming that a substance you inject in your body that doesn’t prevent you from catching or spreading the thing it’s meant to prevent you catching and spreading, and also you need continued “boosters” of which still don’t prevent that, and calling it a an effective VACCINE be lie?

I guess in the new normal clown world things don’t mean what they used to anymore eh septic Scott?

a reply to: Terpene

It's rather hilarious to see the great spokesperson of capitalism not seeing the benefit of these vaccines.

I hope I’ve misread this somehow and you aren’t referring to me as the great spokesperson of capitalism. Just the other week I was being accused of being a communist...

As of now, you can still choose who's slave you want to be, government or business...

No I won’t be anyone’s slave or even lacky, which is probably why I ended up self employed.
Your right about the coming fascism though, the merger of corporations and government, except it won’t be called that of course. It will demand that you the individual, a blatant cause of climate change and spreader of pandemics, must live in a way the “authorities” demand, all the restrictions and measures to tackle the so called pandemic were just a trial run.

originally posted by: surfer_soul

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: v1rtu0s0


Yet again another complete lie of a thread.

The CNN article doesn't say anything at all about the vaccine reducing your imunity or causing anything like AIDS.

And please source your claim for getting AIDS without HIV.

Yet another troll post from a cancer poster. It says drop off in protection which is sugar coating the immunity being reduced.

Drop off in your protection from fully vaccinated.

Nothing about your immune system or your made up VAIDs.

As I explained, they can't admit that and have to sugar coat it. Stop failing at reading comprehension.

It doesn't say what you are claiming at all.

You are lying.

My comprehension of that is just fine.

I'm not wasting my time on your gas lighting and trolling. Buzz off.

Pointing out lies is neither gas lighting or trolling.

If you can provide any evidence of your claims please do so, otherwise I will just keep pointing out you are lying.

Wouldn’t claiming that a substance you inject in your body that doesn’t prevent you from catching or spreading the thing it’s meant to prevent you catching and spreading, and also you need continued “boosters” of which still don’t prevent that, and calling it a an effective VACCINE be lie?

I guess in the new normal clown world things don’t mean what they used to anymore eh septic Scott?

Effectiveness of the vaccine isn't the topic.

Feel free to start a thread on that.

The msm is failing harder than the usual msm dream team here.
The msm can't just change their screen names.
It's sad watching the time they've committed here trying to social influence.
Lol..loo-sa-ers