Donald Trump's 'Civil War' Post Sparks Backlash: 'Beyond Dangerous'

originally posted by: alphabetaone
a reply to: DBCowboy

Oh FFS give it up already.... calling for some disciplined rhetoric is not tantamount to censorship. A f___ing former President should NOT be even entertaining the idea of reverberating the ripples of civil war under any conditions.

If Obama had done it, there would be stars, flags and all kinds of self-congratulatory back patting amongst the sycophants on how patriotic they are for even bringing it up.

Cut the crap and be genuine

Ummm, no.

Calling for "disciplined rhetoric" is just another way of saying, "Don't freely express yourself. Say what I will allow you to say."

Face it, you're on the side of censorship and I'm on the side of freedom and free expression.

originally posted by: Sabretoothrabbit
a reply to: DBCowboy

surprises me as well. that and how people assume the tone of a post or words in an email. DT said "civil war" so clearly he is calling for a civil war I mean what else could he possibly mean? Like if I post the word "snow", means we're definitely getting a blizzard in Florida.

The left has emboldened themselves to be the arbiters of free expression.

Oh crap. I saw Avengers: Civil War. I may have even said so on social media.

Does that mean I'm for a civil war?!?!?!

Oh noes.

a reply to: TzarChasm

Just a stab here, but I don't think the comparisons were between the two activities, but the media/public response to said events. "Mostly peaceful" versus "oh sh*t he RE-TRUTHED something! The sky is falling!!!!!"

originally posted by: SideEyeEverything
Oh crap. I saw Avengers: Civil War. I may have even said so on social media.

Does that mean I'm for a civil war?!?!?!

Oh noes.

You probably also say the word "bomb" on an airplane. horrible person you are haha

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: underpass61

No power, yet there are threads here that are exclaiming that he is so powerful that his endorsed candidates are winning the elections because of his backing.

So either he still has extreme influence on his base, or those claims are incorrect.

Yeah he's got such "extreme" influence that when he said we should all get his amazing warp speed vaccine we stepped aside and let the liberals go first.

LOL

Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele Says the Quiet Part Out Loud About America, “Can’t Be Destroyed So Quickly Unless the Enemy Is From Within”

twitter.com...

This is what started all of it. But is it true?

ATS has a long standing rule of non recruitment! Period.

Nov will be the last straw!

Now if I were to even consider anything after that, some time and consideration must be given to those elements outside the U.S. that have brought us to this point. And I believe "They" should be given trials in Absentia, first. Cut the puppet strings, first. I dont think I have to mention any names.

Yes, the enemy comes from within but require support, directions from the outside. If there be a CW, let it start there.

Though I don’t see a call to outright violence like the dems actively urging their constituents to loot, burn, kill, and do so without stopping then bailing them out and working on getting all charges dropped...talk about actual insurrection...if I were elected President of the United States...chosen by my neighbors and people to be the most powerful man on earth by leaps and bounds yet they weaseled their way out of letting me have that position, I would be much more livid and desiring some fighting to take place than Trump who after such an unbelievable theft and denial of something so huge I believe took it with all the dignity and urging of peace and forgiveness than I could imagine any human being being capable of. His patience is near saintly and nobody can argue that it isn’t, nor given all the info and whistleblowers which/who have come out can anyone actually still argue that he didn’t win the election without a doubt.

a reply to: underpass61

I'm not claiming he does. Threads on ATS claim he does.

a reply to: frogs453

Maybe his influence extends to topics most conservatives agree upon.
Maybe it doesn't blindly extend to other things.
Maybe conservatives weigh each topic on its own.

Maybe liberals should try that.
Then maybe they'd stop adding letters to LGBTXYZ before they've co-opted the entire alphabet.

a reply to: underpass61

And as we've seen in this thread, agree with a civil war. I've no problem with him saying whatever he wants, however he obviously has power, everyone and he himself rave about the crowds he still gets to come to his rallies to hear what he has to say and as the former leader of the country I would think he should be careful of the things he says. I can only imagine the outrage if Obama did something similar.

This is not new for him, he was telling individual states to liberate themselves back when covid was running rampant. He panders to a certain sect that does take him seriously and he knows that. He enjoys chaos and division.

originally posted by: alphabetaone

originally posted by: underpass61
a reply to: alphabetaone

Not the President anymore.
No power.


Yawn

Well, then explain why the alt-right keeps bringing up alleged atrocities from Hillary, and Bill, and Obama....i mean that's pretty deserving of a "No Power Yawn" too right?

Yea, dude was killed last week, they already buried the body. Why bother looking for the killer now. AMIRITE.

a reply to: frogs453

This thread is about a liberal who got his panicky panties in a twist. The vast majority of conservatives don't GAF what he re-tweets. If you truly believe he has that power, the streets would be filled with armed patriots right now.

They're not.


LOL

originally posted by: alphabetaone

originally posted by: network dude

Guns and Roses even did a song about it. Censor that as well?

Except, G-N-R is anti-civil war sentiment. Trump's wasn't.

originally posted by: network dude

You really need to do a better job here.

I dont have to do a thing.

Again, I'll ask, what did Trump really mean when he re-posted that?
This is your post.
You know what GNR was singing about, and claim to know what Trump was posting about. Or do you really have no clue at all?

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: underpass61

And as we've seen in this thread, agree with a civil war. I've no problem with him saying whatever he wants, however he obviously has power, everyone and he himself rave about the crowds he still gets to come to his rallies to hear what he has to say and as the former leader of the country I would think he should be careful of the things he says. I can only imagine the outrage if Obama did something similar.

This is not new for him, he was telling individual states to liberate themselves back when covid was running rampant. He panders to a certain sect that does take him seriously and he knows that. He enjoys chaos and division.

He does enjoy chaos, your current boy is the division king. But since you brought it up, do you think the MSM is equally fair with it's treatment of Trump as opposed to other presidents, like say, Obama or Biden?

We're already in a Civil War just that most people haven't figured it out yet.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: alphabetaone

originally posted by: network dude

Guns and Roses even did a song about it. Censor that as well?

Except, G-N-R is anti-civil war sentiment. Trump's wasn't.

originally posted by: network dude

You really need to do a better job here.

I dont have to do a thing.

Again, I'll ask, what did Trump really mean when he re-posted that?
This is your post.
You know what GNR was singing about, and claim to know what Trump was posting about. Or do you really have no clue at all?

yea, that's the answer I expected.

originally posted by: alphabetaone

originally posted by: underpass61
a reply to: alphabetaone

Some person shared some post.


Yawn

Not "some person", a former President....you know, the one who is supposed to embrace the rule of law and uphold the values of the Constitution that some of us took an oath to.... if it was just "some person" i wouldn't give a F just like you.

That's how I felt when Barack Obama's Attorney General (Loretta LYNCH) called for riots and bloodshed, after Trump outsmarted scumbags Barack and Hillary.
LORETTA LYNCH - TOP LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER FOR THE ENTIRE NATION.