12% efficacy of vaccine according to Pfizer data

I keep seeing this stated, and have heard different people attribute different sources to it.

Where does this come from, how was it determined? Only one person has ever sourced it to me, and that source is a hack, but others claim it comes from prestigious medical journals and then run away without showing me where.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Sources in my signature detail efficacy and effectiveness of the vax.

It's approximately 85 percent two weeks after the second shot.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

I like the links in the signature thingamabob AaarghZombies.

That's a great idea.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Sources in my signature detail efficacy and effectiveness of the vax.

It's approximately 85 percent two weeks after the second shot.

efficacy and effectiveness of raising my taxes maybe...

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Yeah 12% is way off

According to Walgreens own data it actually has a negative efficacy.

What does efficacy mean?

It use to mean how well it protected you from getting the virus

Isnt that why they were all called extremely rare BREAKTHROUGH cases

What was it breaking through?

Please enlighten me on the new definition of efficacy ??

Is it now how well it keeps you from getting sick? going to the hospital?

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Sources in my signature detail efficacy and effectiveness of the vax.

It's approximately 85 percent two weeks after the second shot.

All lies and Bull #####

a reply to: just4fun

The claim is Pfizer data shows 12%. That's the topic.

Would also like to take this chance, to thank our loving and selfless benefactors at Big-Pharma™, and all of the cute little Elves™ that keep the shelves stocked here.

Bless their little hearts !

Call our Booster-Hotline™, to see if you're eligible for a New-and-Improuved™ Booster™ today !!!!

It's got seventy-twenty percent effiCASHinity !!!

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: just4fun

The claim is Pfizer data shows 12%. That's the topic.

Are you saying its not 12 % is it higher or lower In your opinion?

Again what does efficacy mean? And what were breakthrough cases breaking through?

a reply to: just4fun

I'm saying it's constantly stated, and I'd like someone to show the source, where does it come from.

My belief, and data verifies, is originally the vaccine prevented a covid infection almost every time. Now it does almost nothing.

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: just4fun

I'm saying it's constantly stated, and I'd like someone to show the source, where does it come from.

My belief, and data verifies, is originally the vaccine prevented a covid infection almost every time. Now it does almost nothing.

What? It never prevented anything. We were getting "BREAKTHROUGH" cases from jump.

Again what were they breaking through? You cant answer that question because it proves vaccines are supposed to stop the spread.

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: just4fun

I'm saying it's constantly stated, and I'd like someone to show the source, where does it come from.

My belief, and data verifies, is originally the vaccine prevented a covid infection almost every time. Now it does almost nothing.

So you are acknowledging that vaccines are supposed to prevent infection

???

a reply to: just4fun

I've been clear, my thread is about the Pfizer data showing 12% efficacy. If you have nothing to add on the topic you should make your own.

maybe they were talking about this?

www.cnbc.com...

but left out the kids part?

a reply to: Aguythatflys

Definitely not what they claimed. They claim the data Pfizer released, Pfizer's own data, showed the vaccine was only 12% effective during the trials.