House Panel to hold hearing on UAP

House panel will hold hearing(s) on UAP.

USD(I&S) Ronald Moultrie and Deputy Director of Naval Intel Scott Bray will testify.

Looking forward to this. Lots of good questions come to mind, Mellon suggested "Do we have evidence of intelligently-controlled unknowns in orbit
or in space?"


www.nytimes.com...

a reply to: Sublant

We all have good questions, but there are never any good answers. In a nutshell, their answers come down to "We don't really know ".

They've been lying to us since the 40s, they're not going to start telling us the truth now.

My expectations are close to zero, the small diversions with releasing those blurry tic-tac videos have worked just as they where supposed to. Putting a lid on the "we know something they do not" stories. I believe those top position people know a lot more then we hear about.

originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: Sublant

We all have good questions, but there are never any good answers. In a nutshell, their answers come down to "We don't really know ".

They've been lying to us since the 40s, they're not going to start telling us the truth now.

The way I see Mellon's question suggestion is, he knows (but can't say) the answer is yes. So now that we have these witnesses testifying under oath, they can't just say no. They can say something like "I can't comment on that in an open setting" or "I can answer that more in a classified setting". Won't give us much, but we will know, that the answer is not "no". In fact, that would fit well with how this opening up or small d disclosure has been managed.

a reply to: Sublant

"They" are watering the seed again, planted in Roswell last century when it was news around the world.

They are perhaps ready for their next GLOBAL false flag to spend more of our trillions perhaps?

When the answer is yes, does the MIC get $$$ to defend against said “threats”, or do we have to wait for the MIC to roll out the “invasion” and THEN they get power and $?

Asking for someone who cares more than I do about lying sociopaths in front of Congress.

a reply to: Sublant

“The report delivered to Congress last June was done by the intelligence community along with the Pentagon’s Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon Task Force, which the Pentagon replaced in November with a new office, the Airborne Object Identification and Management Synchronization Group. The group’s job is to “detect, identify and attribute objects of interest in Special Use Airspace and to assess and mitigate any associated threats to safety of flight and national security.”


And this is how they weaponize space.

originally posted by: TheAlleghenyGentleman
a reply to: Sublant

“The report delivered to Congress last June was done by the intelligence community along with the Pentagon’s Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon Task Force, which the Pentagon replaced in November with a new office, the Airborne Object Identification and Management Synchronization Group. The group’s job is to “detect, identify and attribute objects of interest in Special Use Airspace and to assess and mitigate any associated threats to safety of flight and national security.”


And this is how they weaponize space.

Yes, sir. You nailed it.

And while this has something to do with adversary UAP's,
it has nothing to do with anything 'unusual' or 'UFO-like'.

This has ALWAYS been about 'Special Use Airspace '.

originally posted by: TheAlleghenyGentleman
And this is how they weaponize space.

You speak in future tense.

Perhaps many of the systems needed are already up there and any new funding will be for other things.

Think Starlink Starlink Starlink

originally posted by: TheAlleghenyGentleman
a reply to: Sublant

“The report delivered to Congress last June was done by the intelligence community along with the Pentagon’s Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon Task Force, which the Pentagon replaced in November with a new office, the Airborne Object Identification and Management Synchronization Group. The group’s job is to “detect, identify and attribute objects of interest in Special Use Airspace and to assess and mitigate any associated threats to safety of flight and national security.”


And this is how they weaponize space.

It is inevitable and already happening. Space Force published an interesting paper last year about surveillance and asset protection in cis-lunar space. Everyone is going there, US, China, India, US companies, multinationals etc. It is inevitable and in many ways prudent that the US military has a presence there. As long as there are competing nations and interest on Earth,backed up bu military power, there will be the same in space.

originally posted by: KellyPrettyBear

originally posted by: TheAlleghenyGentleman
a reply to: Sublant

And this is how they weaponize space.

And while this has something to do with adversary UAP's,
it has nothing to do with anything 'unusual' or 'UFO-like'.

This has ALWAYS been about 'Special Use Airspace '.

How do you know that?

Anything to be “truly” said ….will have to be said under the cone of silence….



👽🛸🥴🥤

From FoxNews……

…..” Congress is set to hold the first open hearing on UFOs, or unidentified aerial phenomena, in more than 50 years next week.

Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security Ronald Moultrie and Deputy Director of Naval Intelligence Scott Bray will testify before the House Intelligence Committee's subcommittee on Counterterrorism, Counterintelligence, and Counterproliferation on May 17.

"The American people expect and deserve their leaders in government and intelligence to seriously evaluate and respond to any potential national security risks – especially those we do not fully understand," Indiana Rep. André Carson, a Democrat who chairs the subcommittee, said in a statement Tuesday. ”…….

I’m thinking this should be streaming live on C-Span TV … just a guess..

👽🛸🥃

This whole idea that NASA, the military, government etc. is keeping UFO secrets is ridiculous. Why would Elon Musk, Richard Branson, or Jeff Bezos be allowed by the U S. government/military to launch trips to the edge of space? They could be filming these craft flying in and out of our atmosphere blowing this great coverup.

Some type of law would be put in place to keep citizens from going higher than  certain heights. The Air Force leases property to SpaceX. They use facilities at Cape Canaveral and Kennedy Space Center. How is this evidence of a conspiratorial coverup?

When you flip the coin, there's actual evidence there is no U.S. conspiracy while there's still no real evidence that we're being visited. The only coverup might be the government being purposely sketchy to keep secret projects under cover while using the UAP excuse. Apply some common sense here.

originally posted by: Ectoplasm8
This whole idea that NASA, the military, government etc. is keeping UFO secrets is ridiculous. Why would Elon Musk, Richard Branson, or Jeff Bezos be allowed by the U S. government/military to launch trips to the edge of space? They could be filming these craft flying in and out of our atmosphere blowing this great coverup.

Some type of law would be put in place to keep citizens from going higher than  certain heights. The Air Force leases property to SpaceX. They use facilities at Cape Canaveral and Kennedy Space Center. How is this evidence of a conspiratorial coverup?

When you flip the coin, there's actual evidence there is no U.S. conspiracy while there's still no real evidence that we're being visited. The only coverup might be the government being purposely sketchy to keep secret projects under cover while using the UAP excuse. Apply some common sense here.

Your response, especially this part:

This whole idea that NASA, the military, government etc. is keeping UFO secrets is ridiculous. Why would Elon Musk, Richard Branson, or Jeff Bezos be allowed by the U S. government/military to launch trips to the edge of space? They could be filming these craft flying in and out of our atmosphere blowing this great coverup.

Is approaching brilliant in it's obviousness.

Of course the 'talking conspiracy heads' will say, "ah! my point exactly!
Elon Musk, etc. is READ INTO "Eisenhowers terrible truth" or whatever
mind-numingly retarded dog vomit is being promoted as 'true'.

I could just see it now if Louie shows up….



👽🛸🍺🥴

originally posted by: Ectoplasm8
This whole idea that NASA, the military, government etc. is keeping UFO secrets is ridiculous. Why would Elon Musk, Richard Branson, or Jeff Bezos be allowed by the U S. government/military to launch trips to the edge of space? They could be filming these craft flying in and out of our atmosphere blowing this great coverup.

They don't just "pop one up there" whenever they want. They need permission and protocols need following I'm sure.

a reply to: nerbot

So if there are 'mommy may I aliens' following complex beaurocrafic
rules, who are the millions of them that spring up, in every conceivable
perception and form, who are doing the anal probing, cow butchering
and all the other crazy activities?

You'd need a space port the size of new york city, to process all of them
in an orderly manner.

originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: Sublant

We all have good questions, but there are never any good answers. In a nutshell, their answers come down to "We don't really know ".

They've been lying to us since the 40s, they're not going to start telling us the truth now.

No, they have NOT been lying to us since the '40s. They just didn't/don't know. You cannot lie when information is lacking. And they've never known the "truth", no one does. When it comes to UFOlogy, everyone is ignorant.

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
I could just see it now if Louie shows up….

👽🛸🍺🥴

Love it .