MSNBC Guest Says She Would Like To Have Sex With SCOTUS Leaker, Then Joyfully Murder The Baby

a reply to: network dude

I do understand that yes, and if im honest a lot of people seem more concerned with the leak as they are the information leaked.

Putting abortion decisions in anyone else's hands other than the person that's pregnant is apt to end badly in my opinion.

And if ever made actual law all it will serve to achieve is to drive abortion underground thus make it dangerous for those involved.

a reply to: Freeborn

I suspect she intended to shock in order to get a point across

Seems to me that's exactly what she intended.

In this day of age people don't care what others say about them as long as they are saying something far as i can establish. LoL

a reply to: andy06shake

I thought it was pretty transparent that for her it was more about raising her own profile, any way possible, than anything else.
Seems to have worked.

originally posted by: xuenchen
What if the leaker is a woman ? 🤣🤣🤣

IDK I’m not a biologist

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: RazorV66

And that's what's called an opinion, which you are entitled to have.

Same as a Woman is entitled to decide what she chooses to grow, or not grow, in her own body.

But you are ok with forced fake vaccinations?

a reply to: RazorV66

Nope, just normal vaccinations with consent of the participant.

What's a ""fake vaccination"" is that where they pretend to stick the needle in, or just the tip?

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: RazorV66

Nope, just normal vaccinations with consent of the participant.

What's a ""fake vaccination"" is that where they pretend to stick the needle in, or just the tip?

What about the consent of the participant whose about to be aborted????

This continues to be where yalls arguments fall apart..
.

It's not her body or the mother would be the one dying it's another body w their own DNA


Just say what it is you're for murdering innocent babies if it's expedient......

Death cult and the typical inability to hold on self accountable

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: The2Billies

Freedom of speech and expression, all that jazz.

It is her body, and her right, indeed as to what grows or does not grow there.

If you wish to find her words or a womans prerogative to be "repulsive" you are certainly entitled to do so.

Same as she is entitled to her comedy routine and an abortion if that how she so pleases.

Dont need to "mind your own business" but you do need to recognise a woman's body is her own concern.

See opinions are fine, but the decision belongs to the person that gets pregnant.

You are correct, in the USA it is the XX with a uterus' prerogative in the US to purposely create a human being for the purpose of ritual religious or political sacrifice if the human is still in the womb, even full term, and the XX with a uterus is healthy and the human sacrifice is healthy but has not passed through the cervix alive.

I can not dispute your assertion that a human can be created simply to be sacrificed for either religious reasons or for political reasons, as long as the human is killed before it passes through a cervix.
You are completely correct that as of this minute, that is perfectly legal and even cheered on and acceptable to liberals and the political left.

originally posted by: WWWIII
Comedian Laurie Kilmartin appeared on MSNBC over the weekend to fantasize about having sex with the person who leaked the Supreme Court’s draft Dobbs v. Jackson opinion, which could overturn Roe v. Wade, then “joyfully” aborting the baby out of spite if it turned out the leaker was a conservative. Watch Video

So basically, millions of women out there who have had multiple miscarriages or have tried unsuccessfully for years to have their own child just had their face spat on by this classless, typical female democrat lowlife.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: RazorV66

And that's what's called an opinion, which you are entitled to have.

Same as a Woman is entitled to decide what she chooses to grow, or not grow, in her own body.

She made that choice when she had sex. Women aren't light bulbs and they can't be unscrewed.

I use the best birth control, it was a sentence that I took to heart and every guy knows it…

”Never put your # in crazy.”

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: RazorV66

Nope, just normal vaccinations with consent of the participant.

What's a ""fake vaccination"" is that where they pretend to stick the needle in, or just the tip?

You know damn good and well that a fake vaccination is a vaccination that doesn't work.

That seems like an underlying mental illness is showing. People like her should not even be allowed to conceive.

originally posted by: Ahabstar
I use the best birth control, it was a sentence that I took to heart and every guy knows it…

”Never put your # in crazy.”

I take it you're still a budding flower then, eh?

a reply to: lordcomac

Nope. Old and wise. Never married. Never had children. Been tempted a few times. Came to my senses or she came to them for me. No blood on my hands in any case.

a reply to: LSU2018

Lightbulbs are not sentient.

Women are not breeding machines that others can choose what grows in their bodies.

Women are human beings who can choose to do as they please same as you or me.

a reply to: ManBehindTheMask

A fetus is not a baby but a fetus.

As to death cults do you mean Christianity perchance?

Coz its killed more people than abortions, and all in the name of God.

a reply to: The2Billies

Not about a left vs right ideology.

Simply about a women's choice to do as they please with their own body.

And abortion is not a sacrifice but a choice.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: The2Billies

Not about a left vs right ideology.

Simply about a women's choice to do as they please with their own body.

And abortion is not a sacrifice but a choice.

Have you seen the thread about Satanists saying abortion must stay legal because it is a religious sacrament for them? They are objecting to the Supreme Court decision by saying they have a religious right to abortion as part of their worship and ritual in giving a human sacrifice to Satan.

In other words they are saying it is a religious right and they are demanding the religious right for their members to become pregnant for the express purpose of human sacrifice. They are staying within the bounds of the law by killing the little human before it is expelled from an XX uterus.

The MSNBC woman who said she wanted to get pregnant by the "leaker" and if the "leaker" turned out to be conservative have an abortion. That is another form of ritual human sacrifice for a political ideology.

There have been women on the liberal left who celebrate their abortions as part of a ritual of liberation. In other words a human sacrifice to liberal and leftist ideology.

So yes there are actually people having abortions as part of a ritual human sacrifice, however, except for the Satanists, the XX with a uterus who are doing t his don't see the "not a baby" as human at all, but it is human tissue that if left to develop would become a human being .

My body, my choice went out the window with COVID and people being fired, etc. for not doing something to their bodies they did not want done.

I am strongly pro-life once a fetus is viable outside the womb (at 24 weeks). At that point a C-section will save the life of the XX with a uterus (the word mother is transphobic and politically incorrect so I won't use it). A C-section can take 5 minutes, like the one my daughter had to save her life. An abortion after 24 weeks takes hours to days depending on the type and is more likely to kill the XX in an emergency situation than a C-section.

a reply to: The2Billies

Naw mate a woman's body is her own concern else you may as well take away any other rights they have, and call them chattel.

You are entitled to your opinion all the same, but again so are a woman entitled to decide what happens to their own bodies.

Most abortions where I hail from are carried out before 24 weeks.

And can be carried out after 24 weeks only in very limited circumstances.

I don't agree with late-stage abortions The2Billies unless for a very good reason such as serious deformity or mental impairment but i do think a woman has the right to terminate early on if that's how she so chooses.

As to the word "mother" being transphobic and/or politically incorrect, don't really care or see it that way myself, and i dont think my mother does nether.