It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

New rules of medicine.

page: 1
15

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 1 2022 @ 06:40 AM
link   
English link: stevekirsch.substack.com...


Doctors should always follow the guidance of the CDC and NIH, even when it is wrong. Any doctor who contradicts what the CDC or NIH say shall have their license to practice medicine revoked. The CDC, FDA, and NIH are always right. So is the IDSA. In the event of a disagreement, the CDC always wins. Unless you are an infectious disease specialist your opinion on infectious diseases does not matter. Ivermectin doesn’t work. There will always be “insufficient evidence” to recommend it, no matter how much evidence there is. Peer-reviewed published systematic reviews and meta-analyses are now considered to be “insufficient evidence” even if there are multiple ones.


It's incredible how the science changed the last 2 years. They are fooling us.
edit on 1-5-2022 by Sander1976 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 1 2022 @ 07:11 AM
link   
a reply to: Sander1976

That's bad advice, I'd get another opinion if this guy was my doctor.

Who the hell is this guy anyways?


Steve Kirsch - Wikipedia Alma mater. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Steven Todd Kirsch is an American entrepreneur. He has started several companies and was one of two people who independently invented the optical mouse. Kirsch has been both a philanthropic supporter of medical research, and a promoter of misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines .


"Promotes misinformation about COVID-19", eh?
Well then that explains it. He is not a supporter of the official narrative and believes in alternative medical treatments, or what is now called "misinformation".
edit on 1-5-2022 by MichiganSwampBuck because: For Clarity



posted on May, 1 2022 @ 08:53 AM
link   
a reply to: Sander1976

Kirsch is right. Every single one of his statements is accurate. If you question the narrative, you're labeled a conspiracy wacko, an anti-vaxxer, maybe even a domestic terrorist. Some of the vax lovers suggested that those who disagreed were guilty of heinous offenses, and should be incarcerated.

Lord Fauci is back, and now he's saying publicly that he should have absolute authority. Absolute power. He's angry that judges and courts should be able to meddle in his mandates.
He has actually said that his organizations (The CDC and NIH) should be given 100% power, and should not be made to operate within the U.S. constitution. No legal authority, no rule of law, should apply to him.

The lunatic wants absolute
power


"It's up to me! Not the courts."



posted on May, 1 2022 @ 12:39 PM
link   
a reply to: Sander1976

I thank God that due to unforeseen circumstances, my son has changed his original plans to become a doctor. He is exceptionally gifted academically, and during the pandemic I quietly worried that he would ultimately be called upon by his superiors to comply with destructive non-medically sound administrative edicts which would include forced vaccinations, the administration of midazolam, putting patients on ventilators which will destroy their lungs, and being unable to provide lifesaving medicine such as Ivermectin. This is just the start by the look of things, the COVID plandemic may sadly have been just the warm-up event, with far worse to come further down the line. I feel so sorry for all the idealist kids who are now forging ahead with their medical training - there will be so many heartbroken, depressed junior doctors starting & rapidly ending their careers by choice in the coming years. What a waste, what a sham, what a disgrace. God help us all to overcome this disgusting state of affairs, across the world.



posted on May, 1 2022 @ 03:09 PM
link   
I have been studying this stuff for many years now. And talked to doctors about it a few times. The doctors can prescribe a med if they just diagnose the condition differently, they can prescribe ivermectin if they diagnose you with worms of some kind. Doctors have been using different diagnoses to get what a patient needs all along, mostly trying to alter things so the insurance company will pay for the person's meds he thinks they need. Not all of those tests the doctors prescribe are just to supply money to the medical system, often an irrevelant test is so they can prescribe something to their patient that is being used off label but the doctor has seen it work for the patient or had other doctors say it works.

I am not against the medical industry, and I think that the doctor you see should be the one diagnosing and treating a disease, not the heads of a big bureaucracy or government agency that has never seen you or your symptoms. These big agencies want to throw away all the doctors experience and dictate things from their plush offices...offices full of workers that don't want to lose their good jobs by saying anything against the heads. Same with the researchers hired to show something, they give the NIH and FDA heads what they want or they lose future contracts.

There is corruption in our medical industry too, but so far there are still a lot of good doctors out there who will work with you till they lose all the control. They cannot keep trying to fudge that computer program to get it to comply with what they know the patient needs for much longer. I see them entering data and asking questions and try to spin it into the program to make the program have the result they want...but some doctors spin it to match their beliefs too, which could also be the wrong diagnosis. That computer program should be a tool, the questions it asks are not set up right to diagnose properly. I think the pharma companies write the script for that program.



posted on May, 1 2022 @ 05:12 PM
link   
a reply to: ColeYounger

They should be incinerated, even!

Hail me to the king, baby!



posted on May, 1 2022 @ 09:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: ColeYounger
a reply to: Sander1976

Kirsch is right. Every single one of his statements is accurate. If you question the narrative, you're labeled a conspiracy wacko, an anti-vaxxer, maybe even a domestic terrorist. Some of the vax lovers suggested that those who disagreed were guilty of heinous offenses, and should be incarcerated.

Lord Fauci is back, and now he's saying publicly that he should have absolute authority. Absolute power. He's angry that judges and courts should be able to meddle in his mandates.
He has actually said that his organizations (The CDC and NIH) should be given 100% power, and should not be made to operate within the U.S. constitution. No legal authority, no rule of law, should apply to him.

The lunatic wants absolute
power


"It's up to me! Not the courts."
Is this why Celebrity Covid Dr. Anthony Fauci walked back his statement about the pandemic being over?

Ahem.




new topics

top topics



 
15

log in

join