The Vaccine and Liver Damage

I read this article, Are COVID Vaccines Causing Liver Failure? by Joseph Mercola, and I think it deserves a deeper look.

The article has an odd structure to me.  It opens with:

A strange outbreak of severe hepatitis in young children has been reported in the U.S. and Europe, puzzling public health officials...In a news release, Graham Cooke, a professor of infectious diseases at Imperial College London, suggested that if the hepatitis was caused by COVID-19, “it would be surprising not to see it more widely distributed across the country given the high prevalence of (COVID-19) at the moment.”1

Potential links to COVID-19 injections appear not to have been widely explored yet, even though the shots have been previously associated with the development of hepatitis.2 British health officials did state, however, that none of the affected children had received a COVID-19 shot.

The article goes on to explain that adenovirus 41 may be to blame:

Five of the children tested positive for adenovirus type 41, which are respiratory viruses that can cause the common cold. Health officials have suggested that adenovirus type 41 could be to blame, but Dr. Wes Stubblefield, district medical officer for the Alabama Department of Public Health, admitted to NBC News, “This is unusual. This virus hasn’t, in the past, been associated with this constellation of signs, symptoms and injury.”

The rest of the article is about the vaccine causing hepatitis, so the above portion must serve a different puprpose. If it is some kind of propaganda, it could be a set of steps like this:
First Mercola introduces a "mysterious" outbreak of hepatitis, careful to mention children.  Children are key because they have not had the vaccine.
Introduce hepatitis.
Introduce association with virus.
Tie to respiratory virus while also leaving the door open to "variants caused it".
Association made is that respiratory viruses mutate and cause hepatitis.
Acknowledge vaccine associated hepatitis.
Blame on spike and avoid conversations about the patent.

The result would be that vaccine recipients who experience hepatitis will associate side effects with respiratory viruses. Doctors would then promote ever more virus-related garbage and the seeds are set for even more vaccines and all talk of the patent will be avoided.

Back to the article.  Dr Mercola notes:

A case report involving a 47-year-old, previously healthy man demonstrates conclusive evidence that COVID-19 shots may trigger hepatitis. “Immune-mediated hepatitis with the Moderna vaccine,” researchers wrote in the Journal of Hepatology in October 2021, “[is] no longer a coincidence but confirmed.”...
The case report above isn’t an isolated one. The Journal of Hepatology paper noted that seven additional cases of suspected immune-mediated hepatitis have been reported following COVID-19 shots, including both Pfizer’s and Moderna’s.

Starts off good, but ultimately leads to the predictable explanation:

Researchers from Ireland noted in November 2021, “It is speculated that SARS-CoV-2 can disturb self-tolerance and trigger autoimmune responses through cross-reactivity with host cells and that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines may trigger the same response.”

If its propaganda, then the associations are made and we come back, as always, to the spike, instead of the patent, which is what people are injected with.  The article opening about mystery hepatitis would simply be the pre-suasion seed being set in the minds of sheep.

Well, does the patent provide a rational possibility?  Let's look at a reference Dr Mercola uses, Acute autoimmune-like hepatitis with atypical anti-mitochondrial antibody (AMA) after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination: A novel clinical entity?  
From this, we learn that:

A diverse range of autoimmune diseases following COVID-19 and anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination are increasingly being reported...
The autoimmune liver serology of our patient is remarkable. While indirect immunofluorescence on triple rodent tissue showed a pattern compatible with AMA, molecular testing for PDC-E2, OGDC-E2 and BCOADC-E2 was negative, indicating that this antibody is different from classical AMA, the serological hallmark of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC).

What is an anti-mitochondrial antibody?

These substances are usually made by your body if you have a condition called primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). PBC is the most common autoimmune disease that affects the liver. Antimitochondrial antibody is found in nearly 19 in 20 people with PBC...It often strikes along with other autoimmune diseases, especially Sjögren syndrome.

And does the patent have anything related?  
The patent lists peptide "Sjogren syndrome/scleroderma autoantigen 1" in its lengthy table.  From Malacards, "Sjogren syndrome is related to salivary gland disease and mikulicz disease, and has symptoms including back pain, sciatica and muscle cramp. An important gene associated with Sjogren Syndrome is IFNG-AS1 (IFNG Antisense RNA 1)"

And, what is IFNG-AS1?
It is an antisense RNA with the alias "Theiler'S Murine Encephalomyelitis Virus Persistence Candidate Gene 1".  
This virus happens to be a picornavirus.  I have posted about picornaviruses on here before, in a post about the patent crossing the blood brain barrier.

The vaccine patent includes the patent, appft.uspto.gov... %22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20150030576&RS=DN/20150030576/" target="_blank" class="postlink" rel="nofollow">WO2015/0030576: METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR TARGETING AGENTS INTO AND ACROSS THE BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER.  
This is one of the many capabilities of the patent, and as examples of viruses that can be used to cross the barrier, they specifically mention picornaviruses.

Further, provided are nucleic acids containing an internal ribosome entry site (IRES). An IRES may act as the sole ribosome binding site, or may serve as one of multiple ribosome binding sites of an mRNA... Examples of IRES sequences that can be used according to the invention include without limitation, those from picornaviruses.

So, a picornavirus gene is associated with Sjorgens, and Sjorgens is compatible with elevated AMA, and atypical AMA's were noted in a study to be related to receiving the vaccine, and the vaccine patent holds technology that specifically names picornaviruses as vehicles to cross the blood brain barrier.

In the blood brain barrier post, I mentioned the example of targeting the VCAM1 receptor as a stage in the barrier crossing.  VCAM1 has a biased expression in the lymphnodes.  IFNG-AS1 also has biased expression in the lymphnodes.

Celebrity covid doctors, naturally, go with the spike.  What are your thoughts?

The narrative on the bad effects of the vaccine is failing.

Why?

Because ton s of us got it, and they feel fine, and I FEEL GREAT.

Thanks for the concern. But there really is no need.

There must be a word limit on quotes. My post was truncated because I didn't close the quote properly.

Are vaccinated 'Shedders' still a factor ?

the children with Hep/ Liver numbers elevated... likely got infected by fully vaxxed parents/ nannies/ care-givers that 'shedd' toxic biomass on the innocent kids !

a reply to: Wisenox

I detest the experimental shots but one of the heaviest drinkers I know is triple jabbed and still kicking around so I think it's unlikely the shots are directly the cause of the inflammation.

It's worth noting that there has been an increase in children suffering liver damage.

I'm thinking that the tap water could be the culprit.

Ours ran brown this morning.

originally posted by: St Udio


Are vaccinated 'Shedders' still a factor ?

the children with Hep/ Liver numbers elevated... likely got infected by fully vaxxed parents/ nannies/ care-givers that 'shedd' toxic biomass on the innocent kids !

I still don't know if that's actually a thing.

a reply to: MiddleInsite

Maybe you're a lucky one. The research study Dr Mercola links to says that relationship to the vaccine is "confirmed". There are epigenetic concerns and long term effects that I worry about with my family.

a reply to: Wisenox

Had to post in 2 parts, until I fixed quote.

Won't I die from my 325% increase in cancer, or VAIDS, or a heart attack or stroke first? I was told that was going to kill me a year ago. Sigh, I'll add hepatitis to the list I guess.

a reply to: St Udio

I don't believe in shedding. The patent is riddled with immunity suppression and avoidance abilities. They wouldn't need those if they could have simply shed it through the population.

a reply to: Wisenox

Try to find and keep your eye on the "Control" group. Those who have not been injected with any Covid-19 (so-called) vaccines.

The data is out there somewhere in the bowels of the CDC.

Time will demonstrate NO VAX = HEALTHIER.

a reply to: frogs453

My main concern is fertility issues.

The depopulation agenda is not a secret.

Just for some perspective, Doctors recently started screening everyone for Hepatitis, where they hadn't been doing that before- this just started in the past few years, for whatever reason. I asked about it and apparently it's some sort of new nation wide objective in the industry. Someone from the bloodwork labs industry probably bribed them to roll it out as a standard.

I've been through the meat grinder when it comes to hospital time and blood work in the past five years, and just a few months ago I was randomly tested for the HEP- turns out for the first time in my life.
Apparently, at some point, I *had* HEP-C. I don't anymore, but my body has the antibodies. I have NO idea how I would have been exposed, since that's the sort of thing you get sharing needles and the like. I even got tested a second time because there's no explanation for the supposed infection.

Today I got my liver scanned for damage from it, but I haven't heard much back yet- just that I'm not immediately dying from liver failure.

I have not gotten the ronies jabs, I fully believe they are a scam and possibly also dangerous.

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes
a reply to: Wisenox

I detest the experimental shots but one of the heaviest drinkers I know is triple jabbed and still kicking around so I think it's unlikely the shots are directly the cause of the inflammation.

I know quite a few heavy drinkers all going strong too, yet also know a few others who dropped dead of cancers/heart attacks etc.

Perhaps the shots are activating a genetic predisposition to disease, so the shots became the nudge toward activating that disease, without which they may have lived a full healthy life. This would apply to alcoholics and non.

edit on 27-4-2022 by igloo because: screwed up the quote. oops.

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes
a reply to: frogs453

My main concern is fertility issues.

The depopulation agenda is not a secret.

Been double vaxxed. So has my wife. Expecting child number 2 in October.

Fertility issues? Yeah, no.

originally posted by: frogs453
Won't I die from my 325% increase in cancer, or VAIDS, or a heart attack or stroke first? I was told that was going to kill me a year ago. Sigh, I'll add hepatitis to the list I guess.

Why is it that this subject can't be discussed without this type of sarcasm?

Of course, millions/billions have gotten the vaccine and been just fine. That's always hauled out as proof but it's just a simplistic diversion.

Millions also live life without strokes, without liver failure, cancer etc. but for that small percentage whose genetic makeup is susceptible to changes that can develop these diseases over time, the shots might cause it or fast track it.

Why is this not a valid area of concern?
Perhaps, many who chose to not get the shots are healthy as is or know they have a mild form of a disease or the genetics for disease that they don't want triggered.

Maybe it's time to let those of us in that category read the research and feel at peace with our decision. God knows we've been bullied enough just for trying to speak about our concerns. Please also understand, due to heavy censorship virtually everywhere, there have been no other platforms to discuss this properly.

If it isn't your concern, move on.

a reply to: Wisenox
Thank you for continuing to share your researched information with us!

Things are slowly starting to come to light. While high numbers of people who have been triple vaxed are 'proof' of its safety, I can't help but notice some vaccines in the past haven't been approved because the number of adverse events is too high. The covid vaccine has shown to have a much higher number, but was still allowed to pass under EUA, and those who have had AE's are pretty much ignored. It's well know all vaccines have a chance of causing adverse events up to and including death, but in a very minute proportion. I don't believe the mRNA would ever have been brought to market if prior standards had been held to.

I read the 'Real, Not Rare' reports where people claiming to have been injured by the vaccine tell their story, and the one thing that stands out from your information is nearly every single one has the exact same symptoms as Sjogren syndrome- especially the 'tingling, burning, lighting bolts, crushed feeling, pinpricks in hands and feet, aggravated by touching stuff/walking', 'all over aches' and 'extreme fatigue'.

Since we have a large number of vaccinated people who have successfully been vaccinated with no problems, that's used to downplay the exceptionally high number of people who have been harmed.

Quite a few people on the site were fine for a few weeks- some for even a few months- after vaccination before their health took an instant downturn, leaving me to wonder about the 'high jacking' of the immune system, where all focus is for covid, leaving little of it to fight other health threats. I wonder if it's possible for viruses we normally can fight off or are relatively minor to become a problem. Viruses mutate, so is it a possible the hepatitis virus has mutated to a more virulent form? Could those vaccinated actually be come a vector for viruses to mutate in an environment where the normal immune system has been fundamentally changed?

Will things like bird and swine flu find the fully vaccinated immune system a perfect vector to mutate in and become more easily transmissible? It's going to take at least a decade of data to know what the long-term effects of altering our immune system will be.

I apologize for the sarcasm. Your response to me was sincere. Unfortunately ATS has become a haven of doom porn regarding the vaccine. Every day is some new scare with assurances of impending death. I can't count the number of times I've been told I'll die in the last year.

Unfortunately many of the things that may occur are also occurring with Covid as well. It seems all of us are at risk of these issues with or without the vaccination. However the risks of a serious case of covid and long term effects are probably higher than the risks associated than the vaccine.

No matter what ATS claims, covid has killed or caused long term effects in the young and healthy(at least outwardly healthy) too.

Tylenol poses a liver risk as well, but we buy it over the counter and there are not 10 posts a day about it. Every medication and vaccination has risks.

I again apologize for the sarcasm and remove myself from the thread.

a reply to: frogs453

Many people seem to be fine. Personally, I don't view 1, or 2, years as long enough to determine epigenetic effects or sterility. S9me of the conditions wouldn't be noticed until the child reaches puberty.

Also, I don't believe that they are doing the same thing to everyone. They would likely spread it out to learn more about adverse effects and provide cover. The elites want to use this technology to extend their lives, but they want the public to test it for them.

With the patent, I have seen a plethora of "clean up" abilities, such as removal of biomarkers, that would otherwise lead to diagnosis. So, it appears to me that effort is made to disguise or inhibit natural responses. For example, there's a patent included that suppresses VEGF.

At the end of the day, they need injections in order to connect people with the internet of bodies. They are heavily invested in the IOB technology, so they must assume that someone is going to connect to it.

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes
a reply to: frogs453

My main concern is fertility issues.

The depopulation agenda is not a secret.

Been double vaxxed. So has my wife. Expecting child number 2 in October.

Fertility issues? Yeah, no.

Congrats!

I still don't think children should have it. There are too many unknowns at this stage.