Russia to remove Ukraine and Kyiv from textbooks

originally posted by: turretless

originally posted by: PassiveSeeker

By the way. You can not change or alter Metadata. It can only be changed or altered by the creator of the content. Like Olga Nikolaevna Sukhanova and Svetlana Yurievna Tokhtueva.

This is another attempt at deception on your part.

"Revamp your information with these 7 unique metadata editors" - www.canto.com...

"How to View, Edit, and Add Metadata to a Photo" - www.makeuseof.com...

"The use of metadata in PDF files" - www.prepressure.com...

Yes your Metadata. The creator. The sender. Receiver can not. Not an attempt at deception. It’s a failure of your comprehension.

This was clearly stated in my post.

originally posted by: vonclod

1st..I'm not sure how much good news there is to begin with, was my point kinda. What good news can you give on..say, NK?

2nd..the sad reality is, bad news is what sells, gets clicks. Good news, probably not so much..but what good news might you expect to hear?

Construction of Dwelling Houses Stepped up in Rural Areas of DPRK

Construction of dwelling houses is underway at the Solbong Cooperative Farm in Kosan County of Kangwon Province.

Officials of the Party and power organs in the province and the county planned and guided the project of building more than 100 houses in a detailed way before conducting agitprop to inspire the masses.

Putting efforts into enhancing the role of skilled workers, they ensured that building equipment, utensils and tools are effectively used and every process meets the requirements of designs and building methods.

The builders are making collective innovations.

The province and the county arranged various events such as a show and a passing-on technique gathering to improve the skill of builders, while pushing ahead with production of finishing building materials and fixtures.

kcna.kp...

originally posted by: PassiveSeeker

Yes your Metadata. The creator. The sender. Receiver can not. Not an attempt at deception. It’s a failure of your comprehension.

This was clearly stated in my post.

30 years ago I studied programming languages, including assembler, so I have an understanding of what programming is.

Therefore, the claims that a good programmer who has embarked on the path of hacking will not be able to change something in the program or in the file are ridiculous to me.

a reply to: turretless

Yeah a hacker can try to change data,and yeah with ALOT of work they can BUT you cannot hide it was CHANGED is what we are getting at.

a reply to: turretless
Ok, thats good, but it's just not really international news. I don't hear news like about countries we are actually friendly with.

I can recall, some stories about China working towards greener infrastructure

originally posted by: yuppa

Yeah a hacker can try to change data,and yeah with ALOT of work they can BUT you cannot hide it was CHANGED is what we are getting at.

Do you mean that when a file is changed, its checksum changes (as it was called in Russian)?

And if the programmer knows the principles of calculating this checksum of a file, then can't he convert the file so that the checksum after the changes will be the same as that of the original file?

originally posted by: vonclod

Ok, thats good, but it's just not really international news. I don't hear news like about countries we are actually friendly with.

I can recall, some stories about China working towards greener infrastructure

Here is the specific data on this issue -

Briefing by Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Maria Zakharova, Moscow, October 17, 2019

17 October 2019 14:59

Biased coverage of Russia in the Western press

We note a very interesting study by Rossiya Segodnya news agency. It analysed articles on news from Russia in six Western countries and Japan from 01.01.2019 to 30.06.2019. Only 2 per cent could be described as positive.

The British media are the leaders in publishing materials about Russia (25,000 articles) and only 1 per cent could be described as positive. In the United States this figure is even less – only 0.2 per cent. Negative articles are about 90.8 per cent of the total, and neutral (information materials) are only 9 per cent. Most of the negative articles were published by CNN, The New York Times, and The Washington Post. In Britain, Daily Express and The Times lead in this respect. Comparable figures are quoted in the analysis of the German media where the audience sees Russia in a negative light because of local media coverage.

Thus, the number of negative materials about Russia is dozens of times higher than that of positive articles. This obviously illustrates the biased coverage of Russia. There is a clear correlation between the policy of the leaders of these countries and the coverage of Russia by their leading media that conduct vicious anti-Russia propaganda for political considerations.

So, what about the institute of “independent journalism” and the principle of “unbiased coverage” that we have been told about for so long? We would like to draw the attention of our Western colleagues, especially the experts for the international organisation Reporters Without Borders and the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media Harlem Desir to the obvious political bias of the Western media.

It would be particularly interesting to know what they think of their international Journalism Trust Initiative in this context, which is supposed to provide for the division of the media into those that are trustworthy and those that are not. How and who will determine the criteria and legitimacy of this segregation? This is a non-classified, accessible and most interesting study. If you express your opinion or an alternative view, we would be pleased to learn about it.

mid.ru...

originally posted by: turretless

originally posted by: yuppa

Yeah a hacker can try to change data,and yeah with ALOT of work they can BUT you cannot hide it was CHANGED is what we are getting at.

Do you mean that when a file is changed, its checksum changes (as it was called in Russian)?

And if the programmer knows the principles of calculating this checksum of a file, then can't he convert the file so that the checksum after the changes will be the same as that of the original file?

Still see signs of modification in it if you look closely at the files. No hack is perfect.

originally posted by: yuppa

Still see signs of modification in it if you look closely at the files. No hack is perfect.

What are the signs of modification?