I read the
Is Graphene
Shedding article at LewRockwell. A couple things about the article need clarifying in my opinion.
First, shedding.
The article subletly conveys the myth that the vaccines shed. The Pfizer documents define exposure as
contact with the vaccine contents, not
simply contact with someone vaccinated, but this is left out of shedding fear-mongering. Meaning, if a person is vaccinated, then passes residual
"
vaccine contents" to another person, then they too could be vaccinated. It isn't someone dropping infectious material like hair. In fact,
ECO Health attempted to inoculate bats using sprays and it failed.
Second, the use of glutathione. The article gives the illusion that glutathione combats graphene, then quickly comes to an end like half-effort
propaganda.
According to Vollmer, graphene can produce thrombogenicity (blood clotting) in the human body when it is at greater levels than glutathione –
the body’s master scavenger and antioxidant that slows damage to human cells.
Glutathione (GSH) does not combat graphene oxide, it reduces it and then gets depleted by it. Reducing GO means removing oxygen molecules, and it
simply gives the GO different elctrical properties:
When the electrically insulating GO is reduced, the reduced graphene oxide formed resembles graphene but contains residual oxygen and
other heteroatoms as well as structural defects. A fabrication procedure for rGO that more closely resembles pristine graphene is an outstanding
challenge in the field...
Field effect transistors (FETs) that employ rGO have been used as chemical sensors and biosensors.
GO and rGO
In the process, GSH itself becomes oxidized and is therefore depleted, which alters the bodies ability to fight reactive oxygen species and leads to
cytotoxicity:
It has been demonstrated that GO causes an increase of intracellular oxidative stress, likely leading to its cytotoxicity and
inhibition of cell proliferation. Being one of the main reductive intracellular substances, glutathione (GSH) is vital in the regulation of the
oxidative stress level to maintain normal cellular functions. In this study, we found that GSH could be oxidized to GSSG by GO, leading to the
formation of reduced GO (rGO). GSH depletion affects the intracellular reductive/oxidative balance, provoking the increase of the
reactive oxygen species level, sequentially inhibiting cell viability and proliferation.
GO and GSH
Taking GSH merely cleans up biomarkers and reduces the graphene oxide for them to obtain new electrochemical properties, like biosensors. Much of
the research on carbon nanotubes (graphene) says that it is biocompatible, but it isn't. According to The International Chemical Secretariat,
graphene itself is noted in several studies to cause cancer
(
Link).
There are, however, legitimate ways of combating GO. GO will naturally degrade in the body from oxidation. Unlike typical oxidative stress, which
results in
reactive-oxygen-species (ROSs), graphene breakdown results in advanced lipoxidation end products (ALEs) and reactive
carbon
species (RCSs). Some ALEs are actual atmospheric pollutants. Not overly surprising its cytotoxic, your body isn't supposed to have graphene in it.
GSH, in my opinion, is not capable of handling graphene breakdown properly.
The only substance that I have come across in the literature for degrading graphene in the body,
in vivo, is myeloperoxidase. The study I
mention above even states:
For example, GO functionalized with a chemotactic peptide was able to deliver doxorubicin efficiently for cancer therapy, and could
be biodegraded by myeloperoxidase through the induced neutrophil degranulation.
Notice, they weren't overloading with GSH.
Rather, inducing neutrophil degranulation to get myeloperoxidase.
Herein lies the problem, though.
As myeloperoxidase breaks down the GO, superoxides will be produced, which can become toxic on their own. There is only one antioxidant in the body
that handles superoxides, and that's superoxide dismutase (SOD), so GSH is not likely to help in combating GO. It will, however, possibly help clear
out biomarker traces of its cytotoxicity.
SOD breaks superoxides down into hydrogen peroxide and water. The peroxide can be good in low amounts, or bad in high amounts; We can take catalase
to assist with that.
The associated patents within the Moderna patent covering the carbon nanotubes include:
WO2012094304: Nanotubes as Carriers of Nucelic
Acids Into Cells
US 8,246,995: Hydrophobic Nanotubes and Nanoparticles as Transporters for the Delivery of Drugs Into
Cells
US013025118: Method for Making Semiconducting Single Wall Carbon Nanotubes
Images of carbon nanotubes used biologically:
The last one is on a neuron.
edit on 20-4-2022 by Wisenox because: Fix quote
edit on 20-4-2022 by Wisenox because: (no reason given)
edit
on 20-4-2022 by Wisenox because: (no reason given)