a reply to:
MapMistress
The point is that the studies do not specify if subjects were vaccinated.
The subject of snakes wasn't a
thing until recently. I don't remember anything about snakes before Ardis and I've been pretty up to date
with the vaccine stuff.
To me, the snake story holds the possibility of simply being a cover story for vaccine side effects. After all, patients with comorbidities dying of
organ failure is not definitive of snake venom mechanisms of action.
Venom does not explain why children were unaffected, as snake venom is not age discriminatory like covid. Higher levels of melatonin aren't stopping
venom-like actions in the body, nor does venom fit the asymptomatic nature of covid.
For example, if venom was a real consideration, then it doesn't explain why the number of 'long covid' patients has remained low. More people would
be symptomatic. In fact, the entire list of covid symptoms would read differently if venom-like mechanisms of action were imparted by covid.
The snake theory doesn't hold water. There simply would have been more clinically significant symptoms in patients of all ages were it to be true.
The combined list of effects would have pointed experts toward venom-like activity rather than flu-like activity.
The fact that the enzyme already exists in the body is exactly what the study I linked to states, and that particular enzyme shares a locus with a
gene in the patent (C1orf134), which has been
interestingly removed from gene banks.
Since i the protein already exists, it performs a function in the body, and if the patent is expressing, silencing, modifying, or creating antibodies
towards said protein, then illness will be the result, and would likely exacerbate comorbidities resulting in death.
The protein in the body performs immunity functions that would eliminate the vaccine lipid nanoparticles, giving vaccine producers a motive to affect
the protein in the body.
So, with the snake theory you have to rely on, once again, leaps of faith for a covid explanation. Conversely, the motive and ability to induce
venom-like activity exists in the patent as a rational reason that is right in front of our faces. If the patent was/is being employed, then putting
out snake garbage ahead of symptoms appearing is a likely move that would be made by the people wanting to cover it up with plausible deniability.
Lastly, the snake theory doesn't explain the wide range of vaccine symptoms.
The vaccine is supposed to be producing the pathogen from covid, so it should be reflecting a unified set of side effects that coincide with the snake
theory, but it doesn't. Conversely, the use of the patent
does explain the wide range of side effects, such as Pemphigoid, low CD4 counts,
1p36 Deletion Syndrome, etc...
If you had the ability to cure yourself and your people of every major illness and give yourself a 125+ year lifespan, would you test the technology
on you? Would you be the Guinea Pig to find out what happens when you mess with genes? I doubt the elites would. They would likely set up a giant
experiment and test each aspect of their mRNA technology on the general population. That way they know the safe ways of treating themselves. The
patent can do this for them and they want us and our children to be their Guinea Pigs.