British government stops reporting data

This is from a Welsh guy who has been following the data from early on, he has noticed that the British government has stopped publishing the death data of the vaccinated and unvaccinated, for the simple reason you are hundreds of percent more likely to die if you have had a booster shot. The reason given is that they are not doing the testing anymore, however, hospitalizations and deaths are easy to get and have nothing to do with the testing. The figures are disturbing, as it shows the vaccine does nothing in stopping the spread of Covid, in fact, it is clearly counterproductive as far as health goes, These raw figures can't really be spun and the conclusion is fairly. definitive. www.bitchute.com...
This guy also noticed early on last November that all-cause death figures were, climbing at between 3 and 5 percent week on week. which seems suspicious, considering insurance companies have noticed this trend, with regard to the original Defence force data, As of march insurance companies are planning on a seven to eight thousand percent increase in all-cause death rates. Which would tend to back his observations up.

just waiting for the 4 disinfo agents to come in here and "fact check" you. I'd name names but we all know who they are lol

a reply to: anonentity

Research and analysis Coronavirus vaccine - weekly summary of Yellow Card reporting Updated 7 April 2022

Deaths by vaccination status, England

They keep saying this on BullChute, yet the government statistics are still available and updated regularly.

I guess if you never checked, you'd probably believe the BullChute, and get all upset.

a reply to: chr0naut

"cough"

originally posted by: justsomerandomdude
a reply to: chr0naut

"cough"

That's one of the symptoms of COVID-19, you know.

a reply to: chr0naut

imagine that... lmfao im so glad that you informed me of that.. i would of never known..

originally posted by: justsomerandomdude
a reply to: chr0naut

"cough"

Yes, but is it or is it not the info described in the OP? I didn't watch, but it looks like what was described is available.

It's hard to fault the fact-checkers when they're right.

a reply to: chr0naut

Did you miss the point in your eagerness to jump? It is from the 7th onward that they discontinued the reports. The point is why? as they are still pushing boosters would it put those rare people that like to know the risks, into the forget it box.

originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: chr0naut

Did you miss the point in your eagerness to jump? It is from the 7th onward that they discontinued the reports. The point is why? as they are still pushing boosters would it put those rare people that like to know the risks, into the forget it box.

What happens when it all goes the same as this thread?

And who authored that OP? Short memory, anyone, anyone?

(Ya really need to treat BullChute with a grain of salt, or at least check up to see if it is, well, like, bull.)

a reply to: chr0naut

Where do you get your information from?

originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: chr0naut

Where do you get your information from?

I get my information from all sorts of places. I also don't believe the first thing I hear or see, that seems outrageous or salacious. In fact, those are the very things that I am immediately suspicious of.

The MSM want click-throughs and so they often post the sensational headline or byline. Often if you read the source documents or the article closely, you can easily see where the truth of something gets 'spun' to be more 'reader engaging'.

And the fact that I have an academic background, gives me some idea of what is possible or plausible, so, I can use some of that knowledge.

There is a principle called Ockham's Razor which states that: "entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity". This means that if something has too much complexity to be feasible, it probably isn't feasible.

With videos posted by anonymous entities, there is usually no way to verify if what is presented is the truth or a lie and so it wisest to be skeptical about anything presented in this manner.

a reply to: chr0naut

You get your info from the MSM. You aren’t fooling anyone.

originally posted by: Middleoftheroad
a reply to: chr0naut

You get your info from the MSM. You aren’t fooling anyone.

I am not trying to fool anyone, nor to make a fool of myself.

Of course the MSM is one place I get information.

I have also read libraries, and get information from non-mainstream sources, too.

Of course, once normalcy returns, after these few years of believing everything un-moderated from the internet, people will figure out ways of authentication far more sophisticated than the systems and credentials of the past. Then these few years of 'internet kookiness' will be a thing of the past.

"As long as the earth endures, seedtime and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, day and night shall never cease.” - Genesis 8:22.

a reply to: anonentity

"for the simple reason you are hundreds of percent more likely to die if you have had a booster shot."

Absolute nonsense, the same as your source, which is well known for accommodating far-right individuals, conspiracy theorists, and hate speech.

a reply to: andy06shake
"cough"

reply to: chr0naut

I like that one, it is probably true, the simplest explanation is probably the right one. There are a few sayings that ring true. Another one is called the Peter principle, which states that people are always promoted to their level of incompetence. So if things are really humming you can guarantee that the outcome at the end of the day no one has a clue what they are doing or why. Which ultimately guarantees that intelligent people are stupid as well.

a reply to: andy06shake

You haven't used a single logical argument to disarm the thread, come up with some facts and figures that prove his conclusion to the government-issued figures was wrong. Because we want them to be wrong, but they seem to be the stated facts from a past reputable source. You have just accused the British government of being from a right-wing source known for hate speech.

a reply to: anonentity

Do you have a source of information anonentity that is not Bitchute?

Because 99.5% of your posting history or there about suggests that you dont.

What i want is beside the point, what you want on the other hand is to present your Bitchute doom porn for kicks.

The British government are a shower of muppets, but they are certainly not pedalling what you attempt to punt.

People who are vaccinated are less lightly do die down to COVID 19, not "hundreds of percent more likely to die".

Simple as that really.

As to logic well you wont find much of the sorts presented nor displayed at racist inflammatory sites such as your one and only Bitchute, so there is that.

originally posted by: justsomerandomdude
just waiting for the 4 disinfo agents to come in here and "fact check" you. I'd name names but we all know who they are lol

Good call



# 1573

Researching the source information in a video is time consuming and in my case it consumes my data as well. It will cost me time and money to figure out what the sources are in the video so I'll be very disappointed to find out the source material is lacking after wasting so much. Also, other than copying the video, the information is harder to archive and uses up storage space on my system. I prefer written copy, a transcript would be great to accompany a video, but it rarely happens that way.