Could this be footage that DeLonge said was blocked from being released?

originally posted by: putnam6
Im thoroughly convince if we ever get legitimate video, most people will go into default 'it's fake" mode and not give it a second look

That have always been my fear also

So I guess for the masses to believe we need something massive, like independence day massive

Looks like a pots and pans parabolic (convex top side / concave underside) lid….

Here….take your pick



👽🛸😆🍺

originally posted by: abe froman
a reply to: cmdrkeenkid

Let's ignore the comments of the re uploader.

This isn't the original poster just realized that the artifact from digitilization isn't visible in this particular version.

Then find the original without the misleading information. I posted the very same video you couldn't link to in your opening post.

Watch closely and you'll see there actually is a shadow cast by the knob, regardless of where you assume the sun is.

No assumption, you can very easily tell the sun is just off frame from the upper right. Show me the shadow you're seeing, because I'm not seeing it at all.

You're attempts at debunking here are honestly weak af.

Nothing like a personal attack to really bring your point home!

You're starting to remind me of the people that tried to debunk the tic-tac video when it first appeared here before it was confirmed.

Do you think that's an insult?

a reply to: Spacespider

Good to know that an even older version of this video than the one above is using the same disingenuous information about the aircraft and its route. Great digging!

originally posted by: abe froman
a reply to: TheAlleghenyGentleman

The audio on this video is not the original audio.

That in and of itself is highly suspect, even more than the things I have pointed out!

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

Where did you get that collection of alien space ships!?

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

That was my take.

I summoned a black triangle UFO; so there' s no doubt
in my mind WHATSOEVER some pretty strange sheiss is true..

but this isn't it..

most stuff you can see online/in the media isn't
it.. for the most part, if you can take a picture
of it, it's a fraud or misperception.

I do prefer the coleman lantern fakes over the
crock pot lid fakes though.

a reply to: cmdrkeenkid

Where did you get that collection of alien space ships!?

a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

I do prefer the coleman lantern fakes over the
crock pot lid fakes though




👽🛸🥴🍺

a reply to: cmdrkeenkid

Am I the only one who thinks this "UFO" looks like the lid off of a kitchen pot and the whole video is laughable?

I could be wrong…..but I think I’ve solved the method of propulsion..



👽🛸😆

Could this be the original, from a terminated channel ?

"https://web.archive.org/web/20141010214204/www.youtube.com..."


copy paste the whole thing

Looks good to me, like others have said, I’m firmly convinced we have better CGI than actually real videos at this point

I’d rather get the conversation moving towards what technology is this for the betterment of mankind’s and it’s real or fake

Let’s get on with it

How can we also get of those rock ? Using a technology which these craft purportedly have ?

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: abe froman

As far as you know, is Tom DeLonge a reliable individual? I've seen his name many times on ATS, but have never looked into his legitimacy.

Tom D. started To the Stars Academy....how much more legitimacy do you want?

medium.com...

I wasn't asking about the projects he started. Only his accuracy with saying "This is real".

a reply to: carewemust

That's the thing.

It's not so much the government is releasing videos on their own.
They're confirming previously "leaked" videos as real

So, seeing a previously released video that matches Tom DeLonge's description of an unapproved for "confirmation " video I started to wonder.

little conflicted on this one!

generally ufo vids [when they're not just points of light] fall really hard into either being very obviously a real physical object or inarguably cg, but for me at least this one is sitting right in the uncanny valley in a way i haven't experienced before.

and it occurs to me that this is likely the most close up vid of a ufo i've ever seen... so who knows? who's to say? we know from countless reports that ufos tend to be preternaturally smooth both in construction and movement, maybe this is just how the real thing translates to low quality video.

i don't know but i'm intrigued.

Watched the video again, and thought about how it could be faked and made look real if it is a fake...

Here is a idea, not saying it is.. but that could be how we see those circles in the clip and that outline of a hand.
Could be a reflection in a monitor playing the animation, meanwhile a man behind the monitor holds a plastic container with a camera inside of it. Take a few step back and look at this picture, you can see a reflection of something.







Perhaps I am wrong and that is no bucket but the camera reflection in a plane window..

Man i miss the old days when the hoaxer would throw a hubcap in the air or something. CGI ruins everything.

I don't believe in UFO videos that utilize jump cuts.

If you are recording an actual craft that might be from another planet, and you're editing your video with jump cuts, you're an idiot on a scale that I can not comprehend.

originally posted by: abe froman
a reply to: Macenroe82

Would be damn impressive cgi tracking considering the video first appeared in 2008 and is probably older.

Consider that YouTube started in 2005.

Do you have any links that show this video first appeared in 2008? That's very impressive if we can prove that. This type of CGI did not exist back then. Not even at Pixar studios would this have been possible in 2008 and like you said most likely much older.

originally posted by: Spacespider
Could this be the original, from a terminated channel ?

"https://web.archive.org/web/20141010214204/www.youtube.com..."

I get a message saying "Sorry, the Wayback Machine does not have this video (MGn_XoOa0h0) archived (or not indexed yet).", no video.

originally posted by: Type1338
Do you have any links that show this video first appeared in 2008? That's very impressive if we can prove that. This type of CGI did not exist back then. Not even at Pixar studios would this have been possible in 2008 and like you said most likely much older.

Terminator 2 is from 1991.



In 2008 it was already possible to do this kind of thing at home, if you had the right tools.

a reply to: ArMaP

bit of a breakdown into how they did the T2 thing, even years later its not easy to recreate for The Corridor Crew

originally posted by: putnam6
Im thoroughly convince if we ever get legitimate video, most people will go into default 'it's fake" mode and not give it a second look

Think about it ... where is our dinky little solar system located in this galaxy of stars? Who in the Hell would fly a UFO all the way out here ... just to have a look? And, what would an advanced civilization want to look at if they did show up? You think 'they' would actively waste time on us?