Russel Brand did not kill himself

a reply to: Grenade

I simply don't categorise or judge people on their religious belief system

What if their religion perscribes ritual pedophilia and worse as a form of worship? That OK with you, don't judge eh?

Sabbatian cults are well documented in the ‘Encyclopedia Judaica’ and in the writings of Israeli academics, including the late professor Y. Tishbi, Yehuda Liebes and Yaacov Katz. In a nutshell, these groups sexually practiced incest, pedophilia, adultery and homosexuality and were otherwise depraved. The Talmud states that the Messiah will come only in an age that is completely guilty or completely innocent (Sanhedrin 98a). From this epigram, the Frankists would declare, ‘Since we cannot all be saints, let us all be sinners.'”

www.winterwatch.net...

The Rothchilds are Sabbatean Frankists, a Jewish religious cult, literally the scum of the Earth, it's beyond wrong.

The inhabitants of Offenbach did have a grateful memory of the beneficent efforts of [Jacob] Frank's relatives on their fate. After the moral credit, there was also a monetary one, because this relatively insignificant family encouraged gossip about their connections with powerful European courts, which so enhanced their position that the best banking houses in
Frankfurt hurried to voice their readiness to serve them.

Even the Frankfurt Rothschilds must be included in the list of believers, as Mr. Schenk-Rinck records in the second part of his treatise Die Polen in Offenbach [The Poles in Offenbach am Main: historical narrative from the 80s of the last century until 1817

cliffordshack-article-archive-storage.blogspot.com...

a reply to: 19Bones79

Consider China's patient rise to power. Even the rag tabloids warned of the dragon as far back as the 80s that I can remember reading about as a child.


Strict adherence to a formulaic approach tends to do this.

Do you know who went to China a couple of decades ago to assist them?

It has been covered quite extensively here on ATS.

Greed and evil spreads like cancer, but you can hardly blame people from one small culture in the Middle East for the evils that China commits today. They're not in control of China.

Americans have been interested in China for a long time. In 1784, when the American War for Independence was barely over, the first ship to sail under an American flag left New York. It was the merchant ship Empress of China, bound for Canton (now Guangdong), China.

At first, the American interest in China was economic. Americans were looking for new markets to buy goods, as the British refused to deal with Americans.

www.heritage.org...

As for China's increasing rise to power...

But in 1972, President Richard Nixon reestablished relations with the PRC. Nixon hoped to use better relations with China to balance the rising power of the Soviet Union. Chinese leaders were receptive because they too were worried about the USSR.

The statement above only shows us how we have a continual pattern of developing relationships with enemies in order to counter yet another enemy. It has been and always will be a continual circle jerk that is pretty much unavoidable at this point in time.

originally posted by: Grenade
When geopolitics becomes too complicated it’s time to blame the Jews.

They make good scapegoats for people's own personal shortcomings, especially when they are broke.

originally posted by: LastFirst
Where did I say complex..

In the post I quoted.

Calculating risk is like ..derp...not.complrx at all..

Now we're on to 'calculating risk' along with creating and owning the banking system? No wonder you think this is all 'complrx'.

originally posted by: Grenade
I would say the London Bullion Marketing Association (LBMA) and the House of Rothschild have real influence on the gold markets which in turn gives them real power over our economies. They are Jewish, not that i can see how that matters.

Even if they had any type of appreciable influence it's only on the speculative side, the manufacturing consumption of gold is only driven by demand.

a reply to: Deetermined

They're not in control of China.

I never said they were. I pointed to the influence the elite have in China which you flat out ignored before blessing me with some insipid talking points.

a reply to: 19Bones79

I never said they were. I pointed to the influence the elite have in China which you flat out ignored before blessing me with some insipid talking points.

LOL! That works both ways doesn't it? How much influence do you think the Chinese elite have on the U.S.? Plenty.

The problem is we have too many elites from all walks of life and cultures who influence the entire world. The real problem here is the evils of greed and power.

a reply to: Deetermined


Nope. The ultimate power on this planet reside with the people who create money out of thin air and charge interest on top of it that can never be repaid, thus weakening the value through inflation driving mankind further into the debt trap. It is enslavement.

A government that can never repay its debt is compromised. That is the whole point.


Greed and thirst for power amongst ordinary people is a natural side effect of living in such a system where your purchasing power become less and less with each passing decade.

These people are at the top of the pyramid. Forbes list of richest people in the world is a joke compared to them.


But ignore all that and take the conversation in whichever direction you choose.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Correct. The US was fundamentally changed under Wilson. A lot. He was very connected and much of it was done with T Roosevelt also. The ultimate Progressive Agenda was passed. It was continued with FDR and LBJ.

Look at what was passed during their presidencies. The Federal Reserve Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, the Clayton Antitrust Act, the Federal Farm Loan Act, and the current Income Tax System.

He is the reason we are where we are now.

PS- It was not the Jewish Elite.

originally posted by: matafuchs
He is the reason we are where we are now.

'They', as in both parties. Wilson passed zero legislation.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

No. If you read the history it was passed with Progressive Republicans which is the modern data RINO. That is the history book I read and it is still happening today.

Remember there was also not as many states or Senators during this age.

This is not about blame. It is about simply realizing the plan the Progressives started 100 years ago.

originally posted by: matafuchs
No. If you read the history it was passed with Progressive Republicans which is the modern data RINO. That is the history book I read and it is still happening today.

I hate to break it to you but the Republicans of that era are the real, old school Republicans, they were all Progressives. You know, the anti-slavery party.

Remember there was also not as many states or Senators during this age.

Huh? There were 96 Senators when this passed. What does that have to do with anything?

This is not about blame. It is about simply realizing the plan the Progressives started 100 years ago.

If you're a Republican it's part of the glorious history of your party. Own it.

a reply to: primalfractal

Then rather than blanket statements using the term "Jews" you should be more specific and state "Sabbatean Frankists". It's like stating all Christians are racist because the majority of the KKK are Christian.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

You do realize people have to be broke for others to have excess in our current form don't you?

How successful do you think you would be if you, had to have a full time job that doesn't pay enough to live by while racking up your college debt?

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Well thank you. I guess the 2 books I read about it were all wrong. Thank F'n God you are around to school us all....

a reply to: TheLead

So being skint is a valid reason to blame the Jews for everything?

I fail to understand the logic of this post.

I was a single parent in my early twenties, i managed to bring up my kid, hold down two jobs and finish my degree.

Granted i would only get 3 or 4 hours sleep a day but i certainly didn't down tools and behave like a victim of some Jewish conspiracy.

a reply to: Grenade

My obeservation wasn't relative to blaming jews, but if someone wants to talk about over representation when it comes to whitey why would that logic not also be applied there.

Can everyone be rich? Is that possible?

You obviously had to rely on others. There are only soo many hours in the day, someone was picking up the slack for you some where. People can only contribute so much energy. I've heard the I walked up hill both ways story before, as someone who is heavily relied on by the story teller, I know the other side.

a reply to: TheLead

Sure, my Mum is an angel and would babysit for me. Again, this has what to do with Jews?

I make my own way in life, i don't blame others for my situation. I was born into poverty, my Father was an abusive alcoholic, there's plenty of excuses for me to shrivel up and blame others for perceived injustice. However, strong individuals take personal responsibility and if they don't like the situation, they change it.

Not everyone can be rich but if you hand power of our lives over to the state you'll see everyone can be poor.

In a free country with equal opportunity and hard work, anyone can be successful. Those not willing to put in the hard labour can't expect an equal share of the fruits.

a reply to: Grenade

Again my observation isn't relative to the jews, it was a general comment to another poster about the ability for everyone to be well off in our current form. Hint anyone halfway honest knows this is not possible. The point of the help is that not everyone has it, therefore meaning your situation is irrelevant to others.

I'm not talking anything about anybody taking blame other than everyone who exploits their value to the world. They change it by joining the game of exploiting their value over others, in our society it can't be beside others. There are many valuable jobs that have to happen for any of it to exist, yet they are highly undervalued.

I want the government and people to stay as far away from my responsibilities as much as possible, others negligence in over exploitation of value and government handouts is going to make that possibility hard for many. Many companies and whole industries have been compromised from the dole for years. In the last 2 years they've reached nearly every one.

Either you work together as a nation and exploit others for their resources or you do it to your neighbors,. It has to exist, our economy is literally built on projected waste. Value is relative.

I wan't people to admit who/what we are and to quit hiding behind avatars. Admit that we're in competition and that you will do whatever you can to get that boat, but realize on the back end somebody is doing a fair days work for less than a fair hours wages.

Is there a difference in principal when destroying an individual, a company, or a country? I don't see one.

originally posted by: TheLead
How successful do you think you would be if you, had to have a full time job that doesn't pay enough to live by while racking up your college debt?

Are you asking me if my poor life choices would be my own to deal with? yeah. But, surprise, surprise, I don't have that problem. No one makes you go to college. No one makes you take student debt if you do. No one makes you sign up for ANOTHER credit card. No one make you buy things beyond your means.