It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: whyamIhere
Spitting on the officer comes to mind.
How does DNA even remotely come into the investigation?
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: whyamIhere
Only thing I can think of is they want to make sure what DNA not to look for when it comes to isolating who stole it.
If three people are allowed to be in the car, and there is one outlier, than the outlier is who stole it, and that can be used as evidence.
I'd still be very hesitant to hand it over though.
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: whyamIhere
Spitting on the officer comes to mind.
How does DNA even remotely come into the investigation?
originally posted by: sarahvital
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: whyamIhere
Spitting on the officer comes to mind.
How does DNA even remotely come into the investigation?
if they find a dead body in the trunk?
finger prints maybe, but o p is in cali so who knows.
i never heard of that just for a stolen car.
originally posted by: Brotherman
a reply to: vonclod
they didn’t want to see vaccine papers, yet they wanted his covid infested spit lllololol. Oh California you silly goose.
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: whyamIhere
Spitting on the officer comes to mind.
How does DNA even remotely come into the investigation?