International summit: 'Are we ready for a New World Order?'

For most sheeps this is still a conspiracy theory, they are openly discussing it and still people are blind.

www.ninefornews.nl...

www.worldgovernmentsummit.org...

While the media and government claim the New World Order is a "conspiracy theory," world leaders and business magnates hold meetings where they openly discuss it. For example, the World Government Summit 2022 was held in Dubai on March 29 and 30. In the capital of the United Arab Emirates, the introduction of the New World Order was discussed. CNN's Moderator Becky Anderson opened the meeting with the question, "Are we ready for a New World Order?"

The meeting aims to “shape the future of governments” and “create a better future for humanity.” These include Klaus Schwab, founder of the World Economic Forum; Director of the International Monetary Fund Kristalina Georgieva; UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and WHO chief Tedros gave an appearance. Schwab said at the 2022 World Government Summit that "we know that global energy systems, food systems and supply chains will be severely affected."

Government officials and even presidents from countries such as the United States, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Sweden, Jordan, Japan, South Korea, Rwanda, Morocco and Uganda were also present. Earlier, US President Joe Biden announced the arrival of the New World Order. He said the US should lead it.

It's all good, they are working for us!

a reply to: Sander1976

Yes but we need to come together for the correct reasons, and in a manner conducive to the majority of humanity as opposed to facilitate the select few.

And if we do ever manage to get our act together collectively as a species, set aside our differences, and address the real problems humanity faces, as opposed to fighting and squabbling over ever diminishing resources, imaginary lines on maps and petty religious indifferent.

Its not just the world that's for the taking, but the rest of the star system, once we manage to colonise and industrialise low Earth orbit, then the moon, and then the rest of the place as we see fit, or as technological progress allows.

a reply to: Sander1976

The meeting aims to “shape the future of governments” and “create a better future for humanity.

I've posted this before, but I think it fits here as well.

Here's their better world in a nutshell...

The vision of freedom is clashing with what the American economist Thomas Sowell has termed the vision of the anointed. In this vision the global population is to be divided into two classes: the rulers and the ruled. The rulers consist of politicians, high level bureaucrats, crony capitalists, select members of the scientific community, and the mainstream media. These individuals conceive of themselves, in the words of Sowell, as “an anointed elite, a people with a mission to lead others in one way or another toward [what they conceive as] better lives.” (Thomas Sowell, The Vision of the Anointed) The ruled, in this vision, are not to be granted the autonomy to control their own lives, but are to “be watched, inspected, spied upon, directed, law-ridden, regulated, penned up, indoctrinated, preached at, checked, appraised, seized, censured” (Pierre-Joseph Proudhon), and commanded in every realm of life, so that the anointed class can attempt to actualize their idea of a brave new world.

Link

a reply to: Sander1976

And who else do you propose should be getting together instesd of these people to discuss world economics in this interconnected globalized world we live in?

A lot of the people that are most scared of a ‘World Government’ (which we have had for a while) tend to have the most physically comfortable lives. Some do not even work. They have enough food to become obese. They have no security concerns. They’re just scared because they think they should be based off what others say. Believing in fear is being a sheep just like denying what you are not being told.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Sander1976

Yes but we need to come together for the correct reasons, and in a manner conducive to the majority of humanity as opposed to facilitate the select few.

And if we do ever manage to get our act together collectively as a species, set aside our differences, and address the real problems humanity faces, as opposed to fighting and squabbling over ever diminishing resources, imaginary lines on maps and petty religious indifferent.

Its not just the world that's for the taking, but the rest of the star system, once we manage to colonise and industrialise low Earth orbit, then the moon, and then the rest of the place as we see fit, or as technological progress allows.

You do realize their slogan is ' you will own nothing and be happy' . Notice the 'you' ? So who will own everything ? Off course the governments and 'elites'. But that's fair in your opinion then as that would be 'conductive to the majority of humanity as opposed to facilitate the select few'

a reply to: Klassified

Thanks for that. Sowell is quite correct.

a reply to: Sander1976

The new world order is the one that asks "do you want fries with that?"

To some extent, we already have global interconnected governments and economies. On the other hand, we still have wars and crime that cannot be solved by diplomacy and law.

Saw this yesterday somewhere in the web. But i am too tired meanwhile to show people, who call others because of showing them facts and the truth again and again, tin foil helmets. The same facts and the same truth over and over again with the same cheap result. I really was thinking about opening a thread yesterday but then i just thought:

Those that want to know know the truth know it already and it´s nothing new for them and those remote-controlled, who simply don´t want to see anything but follow the majority opinion (no matter if this opinion is right or wrong, it´s simply more comfortable for them to only follow the view of the majority and question nothing) will never see something. No matter if you bomb them with undeniable facts again and again.

For me personally it´s meanwhile better to prep equipment, mind and body for what is coming. And being ready for making lemonade when reality bombs us with lemons soon.

Cheers

Well we still a few left in Parliament willing to talk about these things,

SOUTH AUSTRALIAN SENATOR ALEX ANTIC ON THE WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM

As for being ready for it, kinda like getting ready to pull of a big, sticky band aid. Not looking forward to it, know it coming though.

IMO, We have one Earth and if we cannot all come together--every country-- then no, we cannot have a New World Order. With the continuous racism and political divides in USA--who are supposed to lead the way-- then how can this come about? Who would be the model to lead this? Then ask what is their gain?
United Earth Order would be a better proclamation with representation from every 'tribe', abolish the UN and all the subcategories and start fresh with a common goal for us all.
We cannot exclude countries based on morals and religious differences and expect any unity? Who decides what is just?
IMO Until there is compassion for all then a New World Order will just create further division and suffering.

a reply to: Sander1976

I think cnn’s Becky Anderson should be hung . She’s talking about overthrowing our government . Hang her high . Whichever USA citizen showed up for that should be hung . I cannot wait until we send the global elite to the gallows . The sad thing is our country is so brainwashed it’ll be tough to do but it needs done . The tree of liberty and tyrants blood however that saying goes .

originally posted by: cookadafood
IMO, We have one Earth and if we cannot all come together--every country-- then no, we cannot have a New World Order. With the continuous racism and political divides in USA--who are supposed to lead the way-- then how can this come about? Who would be the model to lead this? Then ask what is their gain?
United Earth Order would be a better proclamation with representation from every 'tribe', abolish the UN and all the subcategories and start fresh with a common goal for us all.
We cannot exclude countries based on morals and religious differences and expect any unity? Who decides what is just?
IMO Until there is compassion for all then a New World Order will just create further division and suffering.

Wow you are a fool . One world government means no more freedom of speech . No more freedom to travel freely . No more opinion. No more guns . You will have no rights . Is this what you want ????? Are you crazy or what !????

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Sander1976

Yes but we need to come together for the correct reasons, and in a manner conducive to the majority of humanity as opposed to facilitate the select few.

And if we do ever manage to get our act together collectively as a species, set aside our differences, and address the real problems humanity faces, as opposed to fighting and squabbling over ever diminishing resources, imaginary lines on maps and petty religious indifferent.

Its not just the world that's for the taking, but the rest of the star system, once we manage to colonise and industrialise low Earth orbit, then the moon, and then the rest of the place as we see fit, or as technological progress allows.

"As we see fit" is largely the suspect element in this projection of cultural and industrial revolution. There's a distinct undertone that .5% of our species is singularly qualified to decide the most useful trajectory for civilization over the next century or so, which is not an elective process that operates transparently the way a democratic republic likes to do business.

a reply to: strongfp

And who else do you propose should be getting together instesd of these people to discuss world economics in this interconnected globalized world we live in?

Me, AM, we'll give Bernard a shout, my mate Andy and I'm sure we could rustle up a few more ATS regulars.
I reckon we'd be able to come up with something just as 'good' as those usual idiots with all their vested interests and self-serving grand schemes and nefarious plotting.

a reply to: DerBeobachter

I know the feeling, it's demoralizing. But don't forget that is part of the WEFs 'demoralizing' psy op.
They want us to feel down and defeated.
Don't forget your countries constitution should be on your side during an ' emergency ' as well .

originally posted by: Freeborn
Me, AM, we'll give Bernard a shout, my mate Andy and I'm sure we could rustle up a few more ATS regulars.
I reckon we'd be able to come up with something just as 'good' as those usual idiots with all their vested interests and self-serving grand schemes and nefarious plotting.

ABOUT TIME! I finally get to implement my depopul....I mean, fair and equitable governmental agenda. I'll bring the beer.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

I'll bring the beer.

Sounds good.

My contribution; I'll drink the beer.....and as always look for the answers to all the world's problems in the bottom of the glass....or the next glass....or the one after that. Ad infinitum.

Thanks for the link!

For me it's pretty clear what they want for us plebs.

a reply to: Klassified

a reply to: Bringittothelight

No I don't want a New World Order. Humans are not built to be led by one single voice, survival of the fittest is still embedded in us to the core. I was thinking more along the lines of Reagan in the 80's when he said if we all had a common off Earth enemy like invasion of aliens that we can ALL rally around to bring us together, then no it wouldn't happen.