posted on Mar, 28 2022 @ 05:40 PM
originally posted by: litterbaux
a reply to: gortex
Three things stand out as this not being a missile.
First thing is the bounce. I find it hard to believe the materials used in construciton could withstand that much force to bounce. There are "bunker
buster" missiles that have materials that can withstand direct impact with the nose and ground to penetrate the surface but even these wouldn't take
that much impact pressure to the shaft of the missile.
Second, after the bounce you can see the object trying to correct it's trajectory but failing to retain. A missile would not have that much control if
it truly did somehow bounce off the ground. It should be completely out of control.
Third, if you assume the light we witness is the accelerant, when the object actually does impact the ground you would expect a much larger explosion.
It obviously still had fuel on board when it met it's demise but the explosion seems week.
As for if this is a UFO? I fits the defination but I'm confident all of this stuff is ours.
I spent a fair amount of time looking at this video a decade or two ago and discussing it with my friends and colleagues at the Naval Research Lab,
and there are a few finer points to consider.
First, the video was supposedly taken with an IR camera which, of course, makes the hotter parts of the image appear brighter. With that in mind, the
"object" is actually the hot exhaust bubble of a solid rocket motor. (High performance solid rocket motors usually contain some powdered Aluminum
mixed in to add energy to the heat of combustion. Aluminum oxide comes out the exhaust as incandescent particles with an instantaneous temperature of
several thousand degrees.) The missile body, being much cooler, is effectively invisible compared to the hot exhaust. So, when you watch the video
you have to imagine the missile body sticking out in front of the exhaust bubble.
Second, when the missile is approaching the ground for the first bounce, you can see that it is trying to pull up before it contacts the ground. That
means that it is not a dumb rocket but has a guidance system in it and the guidance system is trying to decrease its rate of descent. In fact, just
before it contacts the ground it is either flat or in a slightly nose up attitude, so it is not actually descending very fast.
Third, for small guided missiles, the rocket motor casing is also basically the fuselage, and a solid rocket motor casing has to be designed to
withstand the internal pressure of the motor when it is firing. As a result, a small missile body is a lot stronger than the fuselage of an airplane,
which is usually thin gauge aluminum. In other words a missile could bounce and keep thrusting if it was descending too fast and it hit the ground
flat (instead of nose on).
On the second (and last) bounce, you can see that it was nose down when it contacted the ground. That would have stuck the nose into the ground and
the resulting torque on the missile body would have broken it apart and spread the fragments of still burning fuel into the air.