It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: Klassified
Good post!
With the "shedding" we're seeing with the mRNA shots, the transfer of the spike protein from the injected to the non-injected, the current shots already do what you're discussing IMO, at least in many cases.
originally posted by: TDDAgain
a reply to: AaarghZombies
Define "these" things.
originally posted by: nugget1
originally posted by: TDDAgain
a reply to: AaarghZombies
Define "these" things.
I spoke about AI, not regulated.
I spoke about GMO, if regulations were in place, it did not stop them
I spoke about releasing GM mosquito, if regulations were in place, it did not stop them
I spoke about the OP, if regulations are in place...
you get it or not.
Not to mention if a high-level scientist wants to research something highly regulated because of its danger, he just goes underground. Build your lab in other countries whose regulations are for sale; divide the research into sections to create a paper trail nobody can figure out. Use HIV+ orphans to conduct experiments on, or take that annoying bark out of some Beagles so you can perform horrendous experiments on them without being disturbed.
The thing about Black Ops projects is you don't know they exist until something goes terribly wrong, and then you have to scramble with a plethora of cover stories in hopes no one will ever be able to prove chain of custody conclusively.
The world could exist forever with the checks and balances of Mother Nature. Every 'tweak' man does to the ecosystem chips away a little more at Gaia's longevity.
originally posted by: Klassified
originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: Klassified
Good post!
With the "shedding" we're seeing with the mRNA shots, the transfer of the spike protein from the injected to the non-injected, the current shots already do what you're discussing IMO, at least in many cases.
This is why I said in the OP I didn't believe pharma has no interest in a contagious vaccine. Of course, the CDC denies any shedding is happening.
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
originally posted by: Klassified
originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: Klassified
Good post!
With the "shedding" we're seeing with the mRNA shots, the transfer of the spike protein from the injected to the non-injected, the current shots already do what you're discussing IMO, at least in many cases.
This is why I said in the OP I didn't believe pharma has no interest in a contagious vaccine. Of course, the CDC denies any shedding is happening.
Shedding was debunked. It was just a couple of women in a law office that had early periods due to stress.
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
originally posted by: nugget1
originally posted by: TDDAgain
a reply to: AaarghZombies
Define "these" things.
I spoke about AI, not regulated.
I spoke about GMO, if regulations were in place, it did not stop them
I spoke about releasing GM mosquito, if regulations were in place, it did not stop them
I spoke about the OP, if regulations are in place...
you get it or not.
Not to mention if a high-level scientist wants to research something highly regulated because of its danger, he just goes underground. Build your lab in other countries whose regulations are for sale; divide the research into sections to create a paper trail nobody can figure out. Use HIV+ orphans to conduct experiments on, or take that annoying bark out of some Beagles so you can perform horrendous experiments on them without being disturbed.
The thing about Black Ops projects is you don't know they exist until something goes terribly wrong, and then you have to scramble with a plethora of cover stories in hopes no one will ever be able to prove chain of custody conclusively.
The world could exist forever with the checks and balances of Mother Nature. Every 'tweak' man does to the ecosystem chips away a little more at Gaia's longevity.
If I went underground to do illegal research I'd never get over the table funding and I'd never get published. Any research that I did wouldn't be classified as my own and so wouldn't have academic protection. I'd essentially be forced to do back room deals with pariah regimes forever.
Sure, I could end world hunger, but only in North Korea, and only once I'd put the finishing touches on a virus that kills all blacks and homosexuals.