Red States Statistically Higher In Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths - Up To 16x

originally posted by: vonclod



Right..LMFAO

Right.. Learning My Fu*King Alphabet Oreos ??

a reply to: ancientlight
It's called laughter, and that is what the claim deserves.

Damage control dems re-writing the most failed past history. Now it's red states. Six months ago it was most blue states with the highest death rates.

A virtual storm in a teacup. But look at the carnage it has left behind. Criminal. Now the focus is on killing the able bodied men and women using alternative methods.

War is a business and the market is open to everyone.

a reply to: Ravenwatcher

originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: ancientlight
It's called laughter, and that is what the claim deserves.

Hmm thought you were a 5 year old ok.

originally posted by: ancientlight

originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: ancientlight
It's called laughter, and that is what the claim deserves.

Hmm thought you were a 5 year old ok.

You are free to think what you like Are you saying you believe 1 in 219 Kentuckians is going to die from the vaccine?

VAERS is managed by a government agency- HHS. Reports made are reviewed by 'experts' and either accepted or rejected. As with all data these days, it can be manipulated to give the preferred outcome.

COVID served its purpose, if the goal was to get us to the point of no return. If the vaccine was to make many more new multi-millionaires, it was a success. If it was to divide and conquer, it's only fulfilled half of its final goal. I wonder what it would take to reach the other half?

a reply to: vonclod

I do not trust this rushed experimental gene therapy 'vaccine'.
It's clearly pushed for nefarious reasons, and all while still in clinical trials.
Just recently the FDA released 9 pages of side effects, one of which is death.

originally posted by: ancientlight
a reply to: vonclod

I do not trust this rushed experimental gene therapy 'vaccine'.
It's clearly pushed for nefarious reasons, and all while still in clinical trials.
Just recently the FDA released 9 pages of side effects, one of which is death.

I get the mistrust, I'm not much more trusting, but I don't see what all these doom porn vax threads show. They are just more polarising crap, vax warriors vs anti warriors, both make outlandish claim..imo.

For the record, I had 2 shots, for work, thats it, not gotten, or getting a booster. I have said from day 1, it should be a choice, I don't support forcing anything.

Every vaccine(for the sake of argument) has side effects, including death, every medication too. I'm not surprised by it.

So..do you believe 1 in 219 Kentukians is going to die from the vax? thats what I laughed at.

originally posted by: coamanach

.....
Since then, it has remained pretty constant... There are less people driving, and lots of them are old people.

No wonder prices at the pump is getting higher... There is less demand for it.

Why is that?

What you're doing here is looking around where you happen to live and making the assumption that what you happen to observe is both accurate and that your observation is representative of the country as a whole. In other words, extrapolating from an anecdotal observation. One of the most common reasoning errors I see here on ATS.

Actually, driving in the US experienced a large increase at the end of 2021 and hasn't gone down:

"U.S. driving soars in 2021 to 3.23 trillion miles, up 11.2%"

"U.S. driving also rose 11.2% for all of 2021, to 3.23 trillion vehicle miles, up from 2020's 2.9 trillion. That was the lowest yearly total since 2003 as COVID shutdowns drastically reduced road use.

.....

The Energy Information Agency says annual average motor gasoline consumption, which fell by an estimated 1.2 million barrels a day (b/d) in 2020 from 9.3 million b/d in 2019 increased by 0.7 million b/d in 2021."

From:

www.reuters.com...

There is more demand for gas now than there was a few months ago but refinery capacity has not spooled up yet to meet that demand, That's why prices are high.

a reply to: vonclod
Those are mighty impressive arguments you're making there. Very impressive.

originally posted by: ussmidway
a reply to: vonclod
Those are mighty impressive arguments you're making there. Very impressive.

I don't care if I impress you..not to be rude. Some things are so ridiculous, they don't merit much discussion, should I produce a graph, or do you like pie charts?

Do you believe 1 in 219 vaxxed Kentuckians are going to die very soon from the vax? No one seems to want to answer that.

you are wrong this is directly from their site A report to VAERS generally does not prove that the identified vaccine(s) caused the adverse event described. It only confirms that the reported event occurred sometime after vaccine was given. No proof that the event was caused by the vaccine is required in order for VAERS to accept the report. VAERS accepts all reports without judging whether the event was caused by the vaccine.

originally posted by: nugget1
VAERS is managed by a government agency- HHS. Reports made are reviewed by 'experts' and either accepted or rejected. As with all data these days, it can be manipulated to give the preferred outcome.

COVID served its purpose, if the goal was to get us to the point of no return. If the vaccine was to make many more new multi-millionaires, it was a success. If it was to divide and conquer, it's only fulfilled half of its final goal. I wonder what it would take to reach the other half?

of the 5 lowest rates
3 are red

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

These numbers are simply not credible. If these numbers were reflected globally we would be knee high in bodies and every opposition political party would be demanding an inquiry.

If we look at a high vax country like Israel, with an extremely over protective government, and an unstable coalition in power where each party is looking for an edge on the other, then you'd expect this to be headline news.

I think that what you're seeing here isn't deaths caused by the vax, it's deaths from all causes within X period of receiving the vax.

You keep putting up these posts making these wild accusations, and they simply don't stand up to scrutiny.

a reply to: research100

The OP seems to treat VAERS as if it contained cases that had been investigated and confirmed. In some instances these aren't even suspected cases. They're simply people dying in proximity to being vaxxed and then being included under mandatory reporting.

Hmmm, I just heard the other day that NC had one of the lowest per capita death rates in the nation and SC looks even lower per the ops chart. Both voted red last election. You can twist statistics all kinds of ways to make something seem like it has something to it. Reminds me of some people comparing oranges to apples in pay when people are working different types of jobs and then claiming how unfair it is that one group gets paid more. Some people push agendas. I’m not sure if this is some kind of blue state democrat agenda or what the goal is.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Haha BS

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

It kind of makes you wonder exactly what red state voters were injected with, doesn't it? It must be different than what the blue states received or the results would be the same... I guess that is one way to win an election.