Pfizer Was Adding Varying Amounts of Active Ingredient to Batches of COVID Vaccines

Since this is an experimental drug (EUA), you could assume they were testing certain parameters of it, including modifying the size of the mRNA payload. However, conducting that sort of experiment using the entire world as a test base seems unethical. What's concerning is the overall lack of consistency. We can clearly see that some batch numbers are way more toxic than others by going to howbad.info. Since the dose size could vary by 30x, we can deduce that batches with the larger amounts of active ingredient could have been more toxic. Anything can be toxic in large enough doses, including even Vitamin C.

Naomi shared her latest bombshell from her investigation into the Pfizer vaccine documents released by the US government on their COVID vaccine testing. Naomi’s team of investigators, doctors and attorneys identified several US government documents that confirm that Pfizer was adding varying amounts of active ingredient to their experimental COVID vaccines. According to the data, the range of dangerous active ingredient went from 3μg, to 10μg, to 30μg, to 100μg depending on the batch they happened to inject you with.

Now there is proof via AMA documents that they are distributing different doses of the active ingredient in the COVID vaccines based on batch number.

SOURCE

Combine this with the fact there were no directions to aspirate the needle when injecting. So you wouldn't know if you hit a vein. Now imagine you just injected the max dose into a vein.

I suspected something like this since the early days. It seemed like the responses from the shots was very different, usually according to area. I've been thinking about different strains of the shot, up to and incuding a lot of saline, rather than the boil, boil, toil and trouble real stuff. Perhaps it is dosage related, but I have a gut feeling that it isn't.
No proof of any of this, but in my head it makes perfect sense.
SnrRog
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

a reply to: v1rtu0s0


Just checked my batch, and of course, I got the one with the highest adverse reaction in the J&J group.

Luckily I had absolutely no reaction at all.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0
Here are the relevant data sheets :

a reply to: KTemplar

well your f**ked then aren't you

originally posted by: KTemplar
a reply to: v1rtu0s0


Just checked my batch, and of course, I got the one with the highest VRA!

Sorry to hear, I wish you the best.

Wonder what the distribution was in each state - I hope it didn't get political
Them being such an upfront nothing to hide group of psychopaths bunch hmmmm would they ?????
say it isn't so - picking and choosing ? Random would be no fun
Jabba Jabba Don't !

a reply to: slowie


Well at least I won’t die in a nursing home 🍀

a reply to: KTemplar

That's the spirit!

originally posted by: MetalThunder
Wonder what the distribution was in each state - I hope it didn't get political
Them being such an upfront nothing to hide group of psychopaths bunch hmmmm would they ?????

say it isn't so - picking and choosing ? Random would be no fun
Jabba Jabba Don't !

Red states were hit way harder based on an analysis I read. I'll have to dig it up. It was either 5 to 1 red to blue states or something like that.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

I knew this from my gut feeling as a fact,, you put, experimental, emergency and protection together and the Frankenstein monster is born, big pharma disregard for human safety in order to make billions.

And the sad thing, is that some gave themselves willingly no once, twice but three and four times.

Remind me of bad surgery, people keep going back to their doctors for more until the doctor kills them.

Since howbad.info is probably getting denial of service attacked, here's another link:

how bad is my batch backup

originally posted by: KTemplar
a reply to: slowie


Well at least I won’t die in a nursing home 🍀

There are quite a few other potential affects with gene modification. It's not always the immediate side effects that happen, but the delayed ones, like cancer, and there is speculation that it modifies gene's that will prevent the next generation from being able to produce offspring.

a reply to: KTemplar

haha always look on the bright side.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Source please.
That's not an experiment anymore- it's civil war.

originally posted by: chris_stibrany
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Source please.
That's not an experiment anymore- it's civil war.

I guess that's what it is. But, we already lost.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Forgive my ignorance here as this is probably as misinterpretation issue on my behalf but that AMA image with the black circle dosages are both 30 mcg/0.3 per dose. How does one interpret 'different dosages' when they are both the same per dose?