It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: opethPA
a reply to: Blue_Jay33
If you choose to not wear a mask and someone else chooses to wear one unless you both know all the variables then how can you say either choice is good or bad?
Doesn't freedom of choice apply both ways or is it only applicable to the topics that ATS is fast becoming an echo chamber for?
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: opethPA
a reply to: Blue_Jay33
If you choose to not wear a mask and someone else chooses to wear one unless you both know all the variables then how can you say either choice is good or bad?
Doesn't freedom of choice apply both ways or is it only applicable to the topics that ATS is fast becoming an echo chamber for?
For a very long time, freedom of choice did not apply both ways, and you damn well know it, so to ask it now is really rich.
Where was this voice of reason when some of us made the evaluation of the same variables and determined that there was no way to tell if the choice was good or bad so the mandates were bogus so we preferred not, and some of us had damn good reasons to prefer not, but we were told we were science denying granny killers.
You do not get to fall back on freedom of choice now that it actually exists and you have to stand strong for your actual choice and cannot negotiate from a position of legal strength to berate those of us who chose and argued otherwise all this time.