Fauci's time in the spotlight is over

originally posted by: ColeYounger
Because Fauci loved his celebrity status so much, he can't seem to grasp that it's over. NBC has stopped calling. Now he's doing the odd local TV news spot in DC, or internet streaming shows, such as this racist debacle called "Woke AF".
The show is hosted by a woman who's tag line is:
"White supremacy is like the Matrix… it is everywhere and in everything you consume."
Fauci's Woke AF appearance, Twitter.
...
I almost forgot, he also did a You Tube comedy show show last week.

Yes, this is what he's doing now.

His worshippers on the Twitter based Dr Anthony Fauci Fan Club are talking less about covid, and more about how much they hate republicans. One of the few recent tweets on The Fan Club was a photo of Fauci petting a dog, to show what a kind, loving guy he is. Someone from the Fan Club said "we're still stanning Dr. Fauci". I had to look up "stanning". I guess it's a hip-hop term.
Stanning is defending / supporting something or someone you really like no matter how problematic they are to the point of being obsessed, delusional or looking away from serious things that harm people, even if it harms the very thing/person you claim to love


It's over, Faucci. Go away!


Where's Fauci???

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: ColeYounger

You suggest that his time 'in the spotlight' is over, and in the same post you describe him being 'in the spotlight' three times in the previous week?
...
LOL

originally posted by: nugget1

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: ColeYounger

You suggest that his time 'in the spotlight' is over, and in the same post you describe him being 'in the spotlight' three times in the previous week?
..
LOL

Even you must admit the spotlight on twitter, Youtude, etc is a major fall from the spotlight of MSM 24/7. Yes, he's still finding places where the spotlight will fall on him so he can stay relevant until his/Gates next pandemic is released.

I've noticed how the woke liberals have very selective and reduced learning skills. They'll do their best to keep Fauci relevant for as long as possible.

But did he lie, or was it just an allegation, based upon belief in a conspiracy theory?

That called for an investigation so that question could be answered. Seems Biden doesn't want it answered.....

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Bringittothelight
a reply to: chr0naut

Fauci gave millions to the wuhan lab . Dr Baric and dr zengele did gain of function testing there . The media told us it wasn’t manmade . They media are evil liars . What’s your angle here ? There’s a mountain of evidence

No-one is denying that the NIH gave grants to research potential disease threats, it was supposed to do that.

But the money trail was not evidence of GOF research.

GOF requires banks of gene sequencing equipment, chemicals, lots and lots of host species to incubate each potential modification, lab notes to monitor and direct the research, lots of staff to do all the work, and decades of time to bring it all to the point where it has worked. Those things are evidence of GOF research, not who gave someone a grant.

But, if GOF wasn't being done, that is far easier. All you need to do is culture stuff from nature, and test that against cell cultures. If something begins to kill the test cultures, all you have to do then is to isolate and document the specific pathogen and publish the results to other groups working on therapeutics and vaccines, and your job would be done, and that was what the grant money was for.

The payment of grant money is just not evidence of GOF. Nor is a speculative e-mail discussing the possibility of GOF. Real evidence of GOF, is real evidence that it was physically being done.

Hey . We’ve been waiting patiently for your reply . It’s been long enough. I take your silence as you were lying . You are a liar . The evidence is here but you are not . Why can’t you back it up now ??????

originally posted by: Bringittothelight

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Bringittothelight
a reply to: chr0naut

Fauci gave millions to the wuhan lab . Dr Baric and dr zengele did gain of function testing there . The media told us it wasn’t manmade . They media are evil liars . What’s your angle here ? There’s a mountain of evidence

No-one is denying that the NIH gave grants to research potential disease threats, it was supposed to do that.

But the money trail was not evidence of GOF research.

GOF requires banks of gene sequencing equipment, chemicals, lots and lots of host species to incubate each potential modification, lab notes to monitor and direct the research, lots of staff to do all the work, and decades of time to bring it all to the point where it has worked. Those things are evidence of GOF research, not who gave someone a grant.

But, if GOF wasn't being done, that is far easier. All you need to do is culture stuff from nature, and test that against cell cultures. If something begins to kill the test cultures, all you have to do then is to isolate and document the specific pathogen and publish the results to other groups working on therapeutics and vaccines, and your job would be done, and that was what the grant money was for.

The payment of grant money is just not evidence of GOF. Nor is a speculative e-mail discussing the possibility of GOF. Real evidence of GOF, is real evidence that it was physically being done.

Hey . We’ve been waiting patiently for your reply . It’s been long enough. I take your silence as you were lying . You are a liar . The evidence is here but you are not . Why can’t you back it up now ??????

If the evidence is here, then present it.

All you have so far presented is speculative commentary, where they spend ages talking about the in's and out's of funding, but the hard evidence is absent.

The international teams of experts sent in to collect evidence from the scene came up empty handed. So, how could some videographer, in another country from where this is supposed to have happened, with no actual scientific background, and who has not got access to the labs, be likely to be able to provide actual evidence?

originally posted by: MetalThunder
So 2021

This video as usual, starts by talking about funding, and claims that the funding was for GoF research, when it wasn't. The grants have clear and defined directives about what sort of research the funding is to go to. The funding was not for GoF research.

The same Research group (EcoHealth Alliance) also applied for research for military applications with DARPA, but this was turned down by DARPA because that research might have included GoF. This does not mean that the other research done on behalf of NIH was for the same thing, or that it included GoF research at non-military labs, like at Wuhan.

The New York Post had an article that suggested that the letter from Lawrence A. Tabak to James Comer was an admission of GoF. However, the letter wasn't any such thing. That NY Post article was almost immediately re-posted to just about every news service, but it was wrong.

Here is a link to the letter.

In the letter it states in the last sentence of the third paragraph that they were "using bat coronavirus genome sequences already existing in nature". Also, on page 2 paragraph 3, first sentence, it reiterates that these were "naturally occurring bat coronaviruses". If they already existed in nature, then there was no new function gained - no GoF.

The letter explains that they found a difference between the original strain of the bat coronavirus discovered at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) - and the virus was thus named WIV 1 - and the sub-strain of that virus, SHC014 WIV 1.

They had noted the genomic differences between the strains appeared to be mainly the spike protein, and the SHC014 strain seemed to cause more severe illness in the laboratory humanized mice (note, humanized mice are used in a lot of bio-research these days, even cosmetics testing).

The letter also explains why the testing done at the lab in Wuhan could not have led to SARS-CoV-2 virus and therefore it also demolishes the 'lab leak theory'.

The video arbitrarily treats some parts of the letter and reports as true, and other parts as false, the determinant being entirely speculative. They completely ignore the possibility that the letter, and reports are entirely accurate, as is most likely.

originally posted by: SleeperHasAwakened
a reply to: chr0naut

Lays out all of the evasive and sketchy activity to skirt the moratorium.

The video alleges all sorts of evasive activity, and does not present any evidence for its allegations.

The guy in the video seems to claim the invention of all sorts of things that are strings of meaningless "buzz-words", and he sounds to me like he is some sort of pro-globalist manipulator of economies and public opinions.

If Fauci didn't prevent the offshoring of research to Wuhan, he was either complicit or catastrophically negligent. He knew what was going on, and either assisted or looked the other way.

So, they should have researched potentially human pathogenic viruses from all over the world by importing them and concentrating them in America?

Were these people examining the Wuhan lab the same experts that penned a note (immediately after the outbreak, before any data could possibly be studied) emphatically stating that the virus couldn't possibly be from the Wuhan lab. They have 0 credibility, as does any team sent by the Chinese government.

And yet here we are, two years later, now that the data has been collected and analyzed, and they are still right, that the virus couldn't possibly be from the Wuhan lab.

GoF research WAS occurring at Wuhan, and in fact it was being done with inappropriate safety standards.

Again allegation, but with no evidence presented.

No amount of spinning or lying is going to change the facts and information that's come to light on what was going on at Wuhan.

Especially in the minds of those that have not actually examined what was going on at Wuhan, and would rather believe the discredited theory that SARS-CoV-2 was manufactured.