A Message For Pregnant Women Taking The Vaccine

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: Ksihkehe

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: Wisenox
There is an article detailing an increase in fetal deaths following the vaccine:

As of the last update to the VAERS database last Friday, which includes data through 2/18/22, there have now been 3,725 fetal deaths recorded following COVID-19 vaccines injected into pregnant and child-bearing aged women.

vaccineimpact.com...< br />
This is actually not my message.

My message is to inform you of a little known fact about the human body.
Our bodies reject foreign tissues. This is why organ transplants require compatibility matching; the body will fight the foreign tissue with an immune response.

However, if the person is exposed to the foreign tissue, such as from vaccines, while in the womb, then it accepts the tissue as from the mother and will never fight the foreign proteins.
Meaning, any vaccine proteins that make it to your fetus, have the inherent risk that your child will never mount an immune response to those proteins, even after birth.

There has already been a thread debunking this, turns out that almost all of these happened in the first trimester, during the most common period to lose a pregnancy, and that the rate of loss was almost exactly the national average.

Math says that these miscarriages were highly unlikely to be vax related.

Way to completely twist facts. The study was done that way to intentionally make the number look lower, not higher. Expect more bad news for your narrative as the court ordered trial data gets released. You'll be doing overtime making excuses for trial data you don't understand.

It was not debunked, it was derided for including women outside the 20 week window for spontaneous abortion. The rate of spontaneous abortion was skewed because those only occur prior to 20 weeks. It was intentional misrepresentation or complete incompetence.

The study intentionally included demographics that were outside the time limit for spontaneous abortion, thus dropping the rate significantly. When adjusted for the actual number suseptible the number exceeded baseline.

What you're essentially saying is that the study skewed the data by including all pregnant woman, not just a small subset?

When you take the women in the range that you're talking about there was no statistically significant divergent from the baseline. So it's still debunked.

How are you saying this without the actual data? It's not debunked. You've given nothing but word salad that you think sounds good. You're just babbling about statistics without doing any actual statistics.

Look at it this way, socialist countries where they pay ALL of a woman's health care costs during pregnancy or miscarriage vaxing pregnant women. Why would the be doing something that would potentially cost them hundreds of millions?

And two insurance companies from those countries have said that the number of people 18-49 without COVID is well in excess of baseline deaths, but you won't accept that information because it doesn't confirm your biases.

You're trying to mix objective and subjective data and draw a completely illogical conclusion about vaccine safety based on medical SOPs, it's hogwash and has no causal link.

Continue to embarrass yourself though, please. The more you post the more people are having second thoughts on those boosters.

originally posted by: Wisenox
a reply to: ThatDamnDuckAgain

'They' means the entire medical community. If you're interested in it, look up immunology self-identity self-tolerance.
The knowledge is older than the space program.

You wrote recently as in

They stopped mandates and started the Ukraine hoax just as research surfaced that the vaccines are taken up directly into the DNA. They found it to happen within 6 hours of inoculation.

This is what you wrote, nothing about the past. I see how you try to get out of it though.

a reply to: Wisenox

Here is the conclusion from a recent study (December, 2021) where they looked at this issue:

"Studies are needed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination during pregnancy, and the levels of protection provided to their newborns through placental transfer of antibodies. We evaluated the transplacental transfer of mRNA vaccine products and functional anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies during pregnancy and early infancy in a cohort of 20 individuals vaccinated during pregnancy. We found no evidence of mRNA vaccine products in maternal blood, placenta tissue, or cord blood at delivery. However, we found time-dependent efficient transfer of IgG and neutralizing antibodies to the neonate that persisted during early infancy. "

In other words, the mRNA doesn't get to the developing child during pregnancy but the mother's antibodies do, thereby protecting the child from Covid after birth. This is why it is recommended that pregnant mothers get vaccinated against Covid.

www.medrxiv.org...

The only kinds of vaccines the CDC recommends pregnant women NOT get are those that contain attenuated live viruses because a virus infection can transfer across the placenta. Some of those are:

Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine
Measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine
Live influenza vaccine (nasal flu vaccine)
Varicella (chicken pox) vaccine

www.cdc.gov...

a reply to: 1947boomer

Infants are not at any significant risk of getting a serious case of COVID.

Typically you don't recommend prevention or treatment for a disease the patient isn't at risk of catching.

The only statistical analysis you need to refute the validity of vaccinating pregnant women to protect the children is infant mortality. They can't be protected from something they have virtually no risk of suffering from.

In science, as in life, it's wise never to say never: an MIT lab suspects that the genetic material from the mRNA vaccines can work its way into DNA. The CDC said it would never happen.

www.msn.com... nes-change-dna/ar-BB1fERAC

There was a time when science errored on the side of caution. The real pandemic was focused on the elderly and immunocompromised; if they had been the main focus, instead of everybody who had little risk of serious illness, it would have played out a lot differently.

a reply to: 1947boomer

HIV is passed to the fetus, and the vaccine has it in it. We were also told that the vaccine wouldn't be taken up into the DNA, but they found it to happen in liver cells.


Also, I'm not sure if they would have detected all of it during phage sequencing.

 Sequencing phage genomes poses several challenges; (1) obtaining pure phage genomic material, (2) PCR amplification biases and (3) complex nature of their genetic material due to features such as methylated bases and repeats that are inherently difficult to sequence and assemble. 

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

The issue here is that the mRNA produced by the nucleus after the LINE1 reverse transcription of the vaccine mRNA would be methylated. Specifically, at the 0-2 spot, its one of the capping properties of mRNA when it leaves the nucleus.
The vaccine CRISPR components insert the vaccine mRNA into the DNA, probably during syncitium. The DNA then prints a protein that is translated by the ribosome into LINE1. The LINE1 then goes back to the nucleus and reverse transcribes the vaccine mRNA insert into actual DNA. Now, when the nucleus prints spike proteins, the new mRNA comes out capped, likely as 'self' because its written directly from the DNA. This cap is methylated.

I hope there is no transfer, so I hope there isn't any in the fetuses.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies


That's been debunked.

not that you care, but once I see that, followed by NO LINK AT ALL, I assume the idiot who said it is totally lying and incapable of discussing anything without more lying and generally douchey behavior.

it's the sign of stupid.

originally posted by: midicon

I thought all the vaccine nonsense had finished with Omicron and they had given up mandating.

Not where I live. British columbia, canada is ramping up while the rest of our country drops all the mandates. I hate canada.

Editing to add... clarification needed... I hate our weak, WEF leaders.

a reply to: Wisenox

All we know is that the average death rate per insurance claim is skyrocketing on life insurance policies. This figure is valid because it affects the bottom line. It also screams that there is a real problem. But trying to get a true number with regards to live births will be almost impossible as the figure is Government controlled. i have been trawling around and just can't find anything recent. This is the real elephant in the room, these figures will be like a state secret because if they are bad it will cause chaos. Birth rates have been dropping anyway, but falling off a cliff is another matter.

a reply to: Wisenox

Ok, I found this, which is disturbing if true:

During pregnancy, maternal T cells can enter the foetus, leading to maternal-foetal chimerism.

Determining the extent of maternal-foetal chimerism in cord blood

So, they found that T-cells can cross, and that relates to this one:

Based on the results of pseudovirus and live virus infection, here we proved that
(1) SARS-CoV-2 could infect T cells,
(2) SARS-CoV-2 infected T cells through receptor-dependent, S protein-mediated membrane fusion, and
(3) infection could be inhibited by EK1 peptide. 

SARS-CoV-2 infects T lymphocytes through its spike protein-mediated membrane fusion

There is something good in this though:
infection could be inhibited by EK1 peptide

EK1 is an inhibitor that stops fusion. With RNA interference, that makes 2 better cures for covid than the vaccines. No need whatsoever to modify genes, and these have known ingredients and mechanisms of action; verification can be performed.