A Message For Pregnant Women Taking The Vaccine

There is an article detailing an increase in fetal deaths following the vaccine:

As of the last update to the VAERS database last Friday, which includes data through 2/18/22, there have now been 3,725 fetal deaths recorded following COVID-19 vaccines injected into pregnant and child-bearing aged women.

vaccineimpact.com...< br />
This is actually not my message.

My message is to inform you of a little known fact about the human body.
Our bodies reject foreign tissues. This is why organ transplants require compatibility matching; the body will fight the foreign tissue with an immune response.

However, if the person is exposed to the foreign tissue, such as from vaccines, while in the womb, then it accepts the tissue as from the mother and will never fight the foreign proteins.
Meaning, any vaccine proteins that make it to your fetus, have the inherent risk that your child will never mount an immune response to those proteins, even after birth.

a reply to: Wisenox

When I was pregnant ALL vaccines, most meds and some foods and practices were absolute off limits to do. They told me to stay away from cats because they can carry a parasite dangerous to pregnant women.

Fast forward six years and a fairly untested mRNA drug, never used in bigger quantities before, with ZERO liability is even recommended, almost mandated.

But this mRNA vaccine is all okay, just stay away from cats and don't eat sushi.

originally posted by: Wisenox
There is an article detailing an increase in fetal deaths following the vaccine:

As of the last update to the VAERS database last Friday, which includes data through 2/18/22, there have now been 3,725 fetal deaths recorded following COVID-19 vaccines injected into pregnant and child-bearing aged women.

vaccineimpact.com...< br />
This is actually not my message.

My message is to inform you of a little known fact about the human body.
Our bodies reject foreign tissues. This is why organ transplants require compatibility matching; the body will fight the foreign tissue with an immune response.

However, if the person is exposed to the foreign tissue, such as from vaccines, while in the womb, then it accepts the tissue as from the mother and will never fight the foreign proteins.
Meaning, any vaccine proteins that make it to your fetus, have the inherent risk that your child will never mount an immune response to those proteins, even after birth.

There has already been a thread debunking this, turns out that almost all of these happened in the first trimester, during the most common period to lose a pregnancy, and that the rate of loss was almost exactly the national average.

Math says that these miscarriages were highly unlikely to be vax related.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

Inducing a immune reaction in a pregnant woman was NEVER acceptable before.

Explain: why now?

You are stupid if you take this and you need to be put down if you are promoting giving it to the unborn and small children.

I thought all the vaccine nonsense had finished with Omicron and they had given up mandating.

a reply to: AaarghZombies
Safe and effective.
As the Duck says,since when did pregnant women take untested treatments during any part of pregnancy?
Oh that's right,since government got involved in poking it's nose further into your health.
Do you get kickbacks similar to politicians?

I was expecting to see
“Just don’t do it”
With an upside down Nike symbol with a dangling fetus hanging off the hook end of the logo.


I was disappointed. 🥺

a reply to: iwanttobelieve70
It seems their are plenty of stupid people out there pushing this for kids.Scotland,Wales,England can't wait to give it to 5 year olds now and give it a month it'll be babies too.
Idiotbook is proof of this stupidity.Plenty of pictures of kids getting injected with " I got my spawn 'vaccinated' I'm a great person.Now my spawn can see granny for the first time in two years".
Just look at TV shows,being stupid is celebrated and seen as a good thing that makes these idiots popular with other idiots.

a reply to: glen200376


Over 5s are now being offered the vaccine, haha how about I offer you the sword

There is only one rule now, as far as I'm concerned

Do unto others as they would do onto you, my two kids are an extension of me, offer them death and I do the same to you,

What other way is there

a reply to: AaarghZombies

My post was about immuno self tolerance.

I included the article as a way of highlighting that there is still something of concern, even if the pregnancy is successful.

a reply to: midicon

They stopped mandates and started the Ukraine hoax just as research surfaced that the vaccines are taken up directly into the DNA. They found it to happen within 6 hours of inoculation.

a reply to: Wisenox

Can you provide a source for that claim?

a reply to: ThatDamnDuckAgain

Its a known thing in immunology. Self-identity and self-tolerance. I wasn't referring to any recent research. They've known about it for decades.

a reply to: Wisenox

I wasn't referring to any recent research. They've known about it for decades.

No offense, but you did.

They stopped mandates and started the Ukraine hoax just as research surfaced that the vaccines are taken up directly into the DNA. They found it to happen within 6 hours of inoculation.

Who is they. Where is the research? If you post something like this, you better back it up because it's food for the anti "anti-vaxxers". So did you just make it up or is there at least any evidence?

You claimed it, now I ask for proof.

a reply to: ThatDamnDuckAgain

'They' means the entire medical community. If you're interested in it, look up immunology self-identity self-tolerance.
The knowledge is older than the space program.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: Wisenox
There is an article detailing an increase in fetal deaths following the vaccine:

As of the last update to the VAERS database last Friday, which includes data through 2/18/22, there have now been 3,725 fetal deaths recorded following COVID-19 vaccines injected into pregnant and child-bearing aged women.

vaccineimpact.com...< br />
This is actually not my message.

My message is to inform you of a little known fact about the human body.
Our bodies reject foreign tissues. This is why organ transplants require compatibility matching; the body will fight the foreign tissue with an immune response.

However, if the person is exposed to the foreign tissue, such as from vaccines, while in the womb, then it accepts the tissue as from the mother and will never fight the foreign proteins.
Meaning, any vaccine proteins that make it to your fetus, have the inherent risk that your child will never mount an immune response to those proteins, even after birth.

There has already been a thread debunking this, turns out that almost all of these happened in the first trimester, during the most common period to lose a pregnancy, and that the rate of loss was almost exactly the national average.

Math says that these miscarriages were highly unlikely to be vax related.

Way to completely twist facts. The study was done that way to intentionally make the number look lower, not higher. Expect more bad news for your narrative as the court ordered trial data gets released. You'll be doing overtime making excuses for trial data you don't understand.

It was not debunked, it was derided for including women outside the 20 week window for spontaneous abortion. The rate of spontaneous abortion was skewed because those only occur prior to 20 weeks. It was intentional misrepresentation or complete incompetence.

The study intentionally included demographics that were outside the time limit for spontaneous abortion, thus dropping the rate significantly. When adjusted for the actual number suseptible the number exceeded baseline.

a reply to: glen200376

You're government might not have done their due diligence, but mine has. We have a more efficient system and less political interference. This is done and dusted where I come from, the miscarriage and stillborn rates have not varied in any statistically significant way.

originally posted by: Wisenox
a reply to: midicon

They stopped mandates and started the Ukraine hoax just as research surfaced that the vaccines are taken up directly into the DNA. They found it to happen within 6 hours of inoculation.

That's been debunked.

What the research actually showed was that the covid virus itself could reverse transcribe its DNA into a cell when it invaded it. This then caused people to register as having covid even through the infection itself had ended. It was never about the vax.

Plus, it was about DNA, not mRNA. mRNA cannot access a cell's nucleus and so cannot use reverse transcription to insert anything into it.

originally posted by: Ksihkehe

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: Wisenox
There is an article detailing an increase in fetal deaths following the vaccine:

As of the last update to the VAERS database last Friday, which includes data through 2/18/22, there have now been 3,725 fetal deaths recorded following COVID-19 vaccines injected into pregnant and child-bearing aged women.

vaccineimpact.com...< br />
This is actually not my message.

My message is to inform you of a little known fact about the human body.
Our bodies reject foreign tissues. This is why organ transplants require compatibility matching; the body will fight the foreign tissue with an immune response.

However, if the person is exposed to the foreign tissue, such as from vaccines, while in the womb, then it accepts the tissue as from the mother and will never fight the foreign proteins.
Meaning, any vaccine proteins that make it to your fetus, have the inherent risk that your child will never mount an immune response to those proteins, even after birth.

There has already been a thread debunking this, turns out that almost all of these happened in the first trimester, during the most common period to lose a pregnancy, and that the rate of loss was almost exactly the national average.

Math says that these miscarriages were highly unlikely to be vax related.

Way to completely twist facts. The study was done that way to intentionally make the number look lower, not higher. Expect more bad news for your narrative as the court ordered trial data gets released. You'll be doing overtime making excuses for trial data you don't understand.

It was not debunked, it was derided for including women outside the 20 week window for spontaneous abortion. The rate of spontaneous abortion was skewed because those only occur prior to 20 weeks. It was intentional misrepresentation or complete incompetence.

The study intentionally included demographics that were outside the time limit for spontaneous abortion, thus dropping the rate significantly. When adjusted for the actual number suseptible the number exceeded baseline.

What you're essentially saying is that the study skewed the data by including all pregnant woman, not just a small subset?

When you take the women in the range that you're talking about there was no statistically significant divergent from the baseline. So it's still debunked.

Look at it this way, socialist countries where they pay ALL of a woman's health care costs during pregnancy or miscarriage vaxing pregnant women. Why would the be doing something that would potentially cost them hundreds of millions?