It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Someone just requested death numbers from the Danish SSI

page: 1
11

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 19 2022 @ 07:22 AM
link   
So we have official documents from the SSI that shows exactly how many died from Covid and how many died within 30 days of being vaccinated.....

Now, they do have to write that it is not a documentation of causality but really....

As of febuary 7th 2022:

Number of Covid deaths (it does not specify "with" or "because of", it also only include people who have been reported into the register regarding vaccine status:

3870

Number of people who died within 30 days after a vaccine jab (either 1st, 2nd or 3rd):

8689

The numbers are even specified in age groups.

10-19: 1 vs 12
20-29: 17 vs 34
30-39: 13 vs 42
40-49: 35 vs 131
50-59: 124 vs 384
60-69: 350 vs 944
70-79: 1009 vs 2370
80-89: 1471 vs 3002
90+ : 855 vs 1774

Now, in Denmark, you were most likely to die from at the age of 70 and above, or ofcourse if you have comorbidities.
So lets instead look at all under 70:

10-69: 540 vs 1547

Dont tell me that doesnt hint towards causality.
Time will judge those who did wrong here.
The truth ALWAYS comes out.
edit on 19/2/22 by flice because: (no reason given)

edit on 19/2/22 by flice because: (no reason given)

edit on 19/2/22 by flice because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 19 2022 @ 07:24 AM
link   
a reply to: flice

do you have a link to the data?



posted on Feb, 19 2022 @ 07:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: flice

do you have a link to the data?


I can post the document... it was obtained as a foia request by a Danish resident.
edit on 19/2/22 by flice because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 19 2022 @ 07:31 AM
link   
The people were/are waking up to the corrupt self proclaimed "elite"

Your future and prosperity was/is in a direct conflict with theirs.

Of course they want to eliminate the competition.....

Don't need a balance sheet ledger to see it....
God Bless



posted on Feb, 19 2022 @ 07:34 AM
link   
a reply to: flice

It would be best to offer some way to view what you are writing about.



posted on Feb, 19 2022 @ 07:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: flice

do you have a link to the data?


Ats upload function doesnt work for me for some reason, so uploaded it here:

postimg.cc...

postimg.cc...



posted on Feb, 19 2022 @ 07:39 AM
link   
a reply to: flice







posted on Feb, 19 2022 @ 07:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: flice

10-69: 540 vs 1233



Your maths is way off, it's 540 Vs 1547



posted on Feb, 19 2022 @ 07:47 AM
link   
a reply to: solentsunrise

Thank you!!



posted on Feb, 19 2022 @ 08:01 AM
link   

originally posted by: flice
So we have official documents from the SSI that shows exactly how many died from Covid and how many died within 30 days of being vaccinated.....

Now, they do have to write that it is not a documentation of causality but really....

As of febuary 7th 2022:

Number of Covid deaths (it does not specify "with" or "because of", it also only include people who have been reported into the register regarding vaccine status:

3870

Number of people who died within 30 days after a vaccine jab (either 1st, 2nd or 3rd):

8689

The numbers are even specified in age groups.

10-19: 1 vs 12
20-29: 17 vs 34
30-39: 13 vs 42
40-49: 35 vs 131
50-59: 124 vs 384
60-69: 350 vs 944
70-79: 1009 vs 2370
80-89: 1471 vs 3002
90+ : 855 vs 1774

Now, in Denmark, you were most likely to die from at the age of 70 and above, or ofcourse if you have comorbidities.
So lets instead look at all under 70:

10-69: 540 vs 1547

Dont tell me that doesnt hint towards causality.
Time will judge those who did wrong here.
The truth ALWAYS comes out.



Being a Dane and having seen ALL the numbers (including historical data for age bracketed deaths) myself, it is clear that you should believe that either

1)
there is virtually no excess mortality mortality, thus no risk of death connected with the jab

2)
there ARE excess mortality and a risk of death connected with the jab, but the numbers are false.


The released numbers all points to the vaccine being safe.



posted on Feb, 19 2022 @ 08:08 AM
link   
a reply to: DupontDeux

These are all the numbers... and Im Danish as well.

Alone the fact that we had to pressure the SSI to start being honest about the "with" and "because of" says it all.

The SSI move from being a science based apperatus under Mølbak to a political tool under Ullum, which is clearly obvious now and during the inconsistencies and lying during the Mink Scandal.

And when we in 2014 had our head of the Health Department standing in front of doctors and nurses at Odense University Hospital arguing that in order for a vaccine to be safe, they decided that it was good science and ethical to monitor 40.000 individuals (in the world) for 4 YEARS during phase 3 of the HPV vaccine, before they would deem it fit for being implemented in the general population.
And then in december 2020, on national kids TV (Ultra News), tell kids... that the vaccine, which at the time had been developed in only 10-11 months was THOROUGHLY tested and SAFE. That's sick. That's unprofessional, that's un-ethical.

And that goes a long way to show what we are dealing with here on the government and specialist level. Liars. Pocketed, unprofessional liars.

We don't even have excess mortality compared to the normal season..... but again, this is not being told.
Our PM sold us out or the advisory group to the government was running errands after having been pocketed by the private sector.

Nobody is going to investigate that... for now. It will come though. And hopefully heads will roll.
edit on 19/2/22 by flice because: (no reason given)

edit on 19/2/22 by flice because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 20 2022 @ 01:49 AM
link   
a reply to: flice

Interesting data, but it doesn't tell us a full story or get us to any kind of proof.

If you're interested there are a couple things you could look at.

If you can get the data on the % of population vaccinated, preferably for each demographic on the existing data, you can then give weight to each column under deaths. The deaths per 100,000 in each subset. The COVID deaths per 100k in each demo vs the total deaths per 100k vaccinated within 30 days in each demo.

Keep in mind this is two years COVID for the entire demographic and a maximum total of 90 days for the jabbed. There are more complicated things you could do to further refine it, but that would be your starting point. It would also potentially be illuminating to look at pre vs post vaccine debut across all known causes of death that match known vax AE, along with % vaccinated over time and how that correlates to the moving averages of both. COD would help rule out the adverse reactions that were not from the vaccines, accidents, existing conditions, etc.

My guess is that if you had sufficient access to the government databases and could parse out more detailed data on dates, demographics, COD, and maybe a few other things, there would be a statistically significant increase in deaths within 30 days of the vax. It would be very pronounced in males under 30. Somewhere around 55 the vaccine goes from positive mortality to neutral vs COVID, with somewhere under 40 it going to increased mortality vs COVID. The 5 year data will be real interesting and I'm happy that I resisted all the pressure to get vaccinated. I'll remain part of the control group.



posted on Feb, 20 2022 @ 06:48 PM
link   
a reply to: flice

What is the normal number of deaths over a 90 day period?



new topics

top topics



 
11

log in

join