Why Illegal Immigration

originally posted by: Bigburgh
Page 2

It's easier to manipulate digital or control digital currency, medical records, taxes......

It does seem to me that Digital Currency (as we see it today) is a repository. Paper/Fiat currency seems to me to be an instrument of debt/credit.

We're all being sold a song & dance about how secure digital currencies are. But, I see how easy it could be to choke someone off from their stash. I also see how governments could restrict the ones that have been developed outside Central Bank control. I didn't buy-in when it was becoming a rage because of these things ... and ... I've only rarely seen a way to exchange digital for anything of tangible value.

Interesting stuff though. Are governments importing Illegals who possess Bitcoins? LMFAO

originally posted by: BelleEpoque
I do think one reason is destruction/control of the existing social order.

I wholeheartedly agree. If you import millions of people and drop them into various areas in groups ... they're going to stick together rather than integrate. It's a simple method of establishing new social orders all over the place.

a reply to: Snarl

I have a Charles Schwab account.
They often send info on where and what to sell, trade or buy.

Got a thick letter informing me that they (CS) has now gotten on board with Crypto Currency.

I've never and to this day have ever purchased a Crypto bit coin ( laughing because I sound like I need AARP help from Lemon Seniors )


Perhaps it's time for Charles Schwab to explain to me what backs up or what the collateral.


Now back to illegal immigration. Flood the system, overwhelm.


Reorganization under new management.

a reply to: Snarl
What is the endgame of Marxism?
A two tier system. The rich and the poor. The poor own nothing and the rich own everything.
"You will own nothing and be happy."

How does immigration help to accomplish that goal?
Immigrants will vote for and support those who brought them into the country.
They will do the jobs Americans will and won't do for less money and benefits.
They will introduce multi-culturalism instead of adapting to American culture and laws.
They will be more malleable to a neo-marxist system.
And eventually, they will be large enough in number to all but erase traditional American culture.

That's the short answer.

originally posted by: network dude
I have read "One Second After", and think that explains how fast and how far we would descend.
It's a bit scary, but when you understand the bigger picture, there is no way to avoid it.

A good buddy of mine turned me on to that book shortly after it was published. While I couldn't continue to read when it turned mushy, I do think the early part of it was an accurate capture of 'what could' be made to happen. EMPs are actually highly overrated unless they're set off as a series of events. There are better ways far less destructive.

I think more than 50% of people would just give up trying within the first ten days. Far earlier if something were to be 'touched off' during the middle of winter. The elites wouldn't have to much worry about being set upon by Lynch Mobs. We might get a few of 'em, but people like Bill Gates would retreat to their hideaways PDQ and could hold out long enough to outlast. I understand why some folks fail to see any complexity in this effort. I respect their opinions, but I've seen what these rich people are afraid of ... and, they are afraid.

The gene therapy experiment and the collapse of the reserve currency through debt are looming. I see the Illegals as bullet sponges. Which makes me recall a study addressing the US DoD's arsenal and the fact we didn't have enough capability to kill-off the chinee PLA with conventional weapons. The ammo shortage isn't a real thing until you wonder where all those bullets ... that all of the manufacturers have claimed to have been making (full production) ... who they've been delivered to. We're talking two-frikkin'-years worth of manufacturing. And hardly a damned thing arriving on the shelves. And still can't find a case of primers. Who got all them bullets?

a reply to: AaarghZombies

Illegal immigrants were allowed to vote last election?

originally posted by: o0oTOPCATo0o
a reply to: AaarghZombies

Illegal immigrants were allowed to vote last election?

Do you think that Trump would have lost if they didn't?

Cubans and Venezuelans in particular have seen first hand what happens when you get a radical socialist in power, they fled it, do they don't want to elect it.

a reply to: Snarl

The Cloward-Piven Strategy.

*boom*

Thanks for your reply!!

originally posted by: Klassified
a reply to: Snarl
What is the endgame of Marxism?
A two tier system. The rich and the poor. The poor own nothing and the rich own everything.
"You will own nothing and be happy."

How does immigration help to accomplish that goal?
Immigrants will vote for and support those who brought them into the country.
They will do the jobs Americans will and won't do for less money and benefits.
They will introduce multi-culturalism instead of adapting to American culture and laws.
They will be more malleable to a neo-marxist system.
And eventually, they will be large enough in number to all but erase traditional American culture.

That's the short answer.

But there's no one real to vote for under Marxism.

Historically, Marxism doesn't appear to be a sustainable government model either. Could it be that this Great Reset aspect of what is asked here, will mean they have to take away everything to start doling it back out simply to maintain order and control? Is that what you're implying?

originally posted by: DBCowboy
*boom*

You've earned my nomination for the Thread Killers gray council, DB!!

a reply to: Snarl

But there's no one real to vote for under Marxism.

Right. Just like now.

Historically, Marxism doesn't appear to be a sustainable government model either.

That's never stopped them before. It doesn't have to be sustainable. When it collapses, they will just "Build back better". History has plenty of examples.

Could it be that this Great Reset aspect of what is asked here, will mean they have to take away everything to start doling it back out simply to maintain order and control? Is that what you're implying?

a reply to: AaarghZombies

I think Trump lost the day that they allowed mass mail in voting and a lot of young people who are too lazy to get off their butt and go vote did it from home.

Thank you for sharing! Several good points made in the video. a reply to: Edumakated

a reply to: DBCowboy
That's exactly what came to my mind, along with Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals.

Rule 1: Power is not only what you have, but what an opponent thinks you have. If your organization is small, hide your numbers in the dark and raise a din that will make everyone think you have many more people than you do.

Rule 2: Never go outside the experience of your people.
The result is confusion, fear, and retreat.

Rule 3: Whenever possible, go outside the experience of an opponent. Here you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat.

Rule 4: Make opponents live up to their own book of rules. "You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity."

Rule 5: Ridicule is man's most potent weapon. It's hard to counterattack ridicule, and it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.

Rule 6: A good tactic is one your people enjoy. "If your people aren't having a ball doing it, there is something very wrong with the tactic."

Rule 7: A tactic that drags on for too long becomes a drag. Commitment may become ritualistic as people turn to other issues.

Rule 8: Keep the pressure on. Use different tactics and actions and use all events of the period for your purpose. "The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition. It is this that will cause the opposition to react to your advantage."

Rule 9: The threat is more terrifying than the thing itself. When Alinsky leaked word that large numbers of poor people were going to tie up the washrooms of O'Hare Airport, Chicago city authorities quickly agreed to act on a longstanding commitment to a ghetto organization. They imagined the mayhem as thousands of passengers poured off airplanes to discover every washroom occupied. Then they imagined the international embarrassment and the damage to the city's reputation.

Rule 10: The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative. Avoid being trapped by an opponent or an interviewer who says, "Okay, what would you do?"

Rule 11: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, polarize it. Don't try to attack abstract corporations or bureaucracies. Identify a responsible individual. Ignore attempts to shift or spread the blame.

According to Alinsky, the main job of the organizer is to bait an opponent into reacting. "The enemy properly goaded and guided in his reaction will be your major strength."

In conjunction with the Cloward-Piven Strategy, the play book being used becomes obvious.

1) Healthcare– Control healthcare and you control the people

2) Poverty – Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.

3) Debt – Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.

4) Gun Control– Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state.

5) Welfare – Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income)

6) Education – Take control of what people read and listen to – take control of what children learn in school.

7) Religion – Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools

8) Class Warfare – Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.

citizenshandbook.org...
www.preparingyou.com...

Divide and Conquer. Break up formerly racially and socially homogenous populations into competing racial, cultural, religious, and economic groups. When the natives get restless, just set the groups against one another.

The strategy is known in the trade as "The Cuckoo Imperative".