German Doctor confirms That Excess Mortality Is Directly Linked To Covid 19 Vaccination

a reply to: Smigg

They tried to dox a vaccine resistant thread creator, we think. So, probably the latter.

The intelligence services and big pharma have good benefits packages, so shills and agents can get therapy for their echo chamber being popped. That's assuming they aren't a per diem craigslist hire, lol.

Argh, if the case is the latter you can always get marginal health care through the Obamacare health exchanges.

a reply to: Smigg

I don't care about her opinion, what's the data that proves it?

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Smigg

I don't care about her opinion, what's the data that proves it?

She believes that scar tissue can hold memories and that it can cause PTSD. And I mean literally not psychologically.

Her data is likely garbage.

My Missus died end of Jan.
Was a nurse, had no underlying illnesses.
Died within 12hr of being admitted to hospital.
Death Cert = Fulminant Myocarditis secondary to covid + Cardiogenic shock.
Double jabbed. Tested positive for covid a month before with slight cold symptoms.
I'm unvaxxed never caught it.
She was fine until she went back to work.

a reply to: UKWO1Phot

Such a sad story.

The shots are bioweapons. Those who created and administered them have blood on their hands.

originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: UKWO1Phot

Such a sad story.

The shots are bioweapons. Those who created and administered them have blood on their hands.

Link, please.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

Common sense and knowledge, and you seem to lack both.

a reply to: UKWO1Phot

so sorry for your loss.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
Her data is likely garbage.

Hello Mr. Zombies,

I have written to you today to ask you to please be objective and not just post based on opinion if you are going to continue having a problem when others do so. You state her data is likely garbage, which means you have not seen her data. You seem to always want the data when it's from anyone else, what makes this any different? If an ex-con was put in charge of delivering you a court summons, would you disregard the summons because of the source, or would you check the validity of the data before you made up your mind?

Warm regards,

Andr3w68

Also if anyone wants to check which batches kill.
1st Dose - AstraZen AB - Batch PW40008
2nd Dose - AstraZen AB - Batch PV46699

a reply to: UKWO1Phot
Sorry for your loss mate.

a reply to: Salander

So, no link then?

I'd wager that I my knowledge on the subject outstrips yours.

originally posted by: andr3w68

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
Her data is likely garbage.

Hello Mr. Zombies,

I have written to you today to ask you to please be objective and not just post based on opinion if you are going to continue having a problem when others do so. You state her data is likely garbage, which means you have not seen her data. You seem to always want the data when it's from anyone else, what makes this any different? If an ex-con was put in charge of delivering you a court summons, would you disregard the summons because of the source, or would you check the validity of the data before you made up your mind?

Warm regards,

Andr3w68

OK, I will rephrase, her data IS garbage, but she since doesn't share most of it with I'm going to struggle to find you examples. So I'll settle for saying that her conclusions are garbage and we're left wondering how she reached them since the data that she does share isn't sufficient to reach a conclusion, let alone the one that she reached.

Presumably she did created a detailed mathematical model, which she hasn't shared with us, based on data, that she also hasn't shared with us. I've seen the data that's publicly available, and it doesn't support her conclusions.

If you see the links in my signature, they contain a lot of the data that I use. I'm not shy about it. Click a couple.

If an ex-con was put in charge of delivering you a court summons, would you disregard the summons because of the source,

Yes. And so should you, if that ex-con was a known forger or committed fraud. I'd contact the court directly and tell them to send down someone who was less likely to be running a con on me.

would you check the validity of the data before you made up your mind

I'd check it after I'd thrown the messenger our and locked the door.

please be objective

I looked at the available evidence, which is that she doesn't share anywhere near enough of her data to support her conclusions.

She's also an holistic healer and a homeopath, with no experience in virology, epidemiology or vaccinations. She promotes quackery and snake oil. Seriously, look at her bio on the attached link. She claims that damaged tissue can hold memories, which can be released to cause PTSD, or that it can interfere with your Chakra and cause psychosis. If you dig a little I'm sure that her you will find her opinions on Autism. Go look, tell me where they speak to her credibility.

Link

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: andr3w68

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
Her data is likely garbage.

Hello Mr. Zombies,

I have written to you today to ask you to please be objective and not just post based on opinion if you are going to continue having a problem when others do so. You state her data is likely garbage, which means you have not seen her data. You seem to always want the data when it's from anyone else, what makes this any different? If an ex-con was put in charge of delivering you a court summons, would you disregard the summons because of the source, or would you check the validity of the data before you made up your mind?

Warm regards,

Andr3w68

OK, I will rephrase, her data IS garbage, but she since doesn't share most of it with I'm going to struggle to find you examples. So I'll settle for saying that her conclusions are garbage and we're left wondering how she reached them since the data that she does share isn't sufficient to reach a conclusion, let alone the one that she reached.

Presumably she did created a detailed mathematical model, which she hasn't shared with us, based on data, that she also hasn't shared with us. I've seen the data that's publicly available, and it doesn't support her conclusions.

If you see the links in my signature, they contain a lot of the data that I use. I'm not shy about it. Click a couple.

If an ex-con was put in charge of delivering you a court summons, would you disregard the summons because of the source,

Yes. And so should you, if that ex-con was a known forger or committed fraud. I'd contact the court directly and tell them to send down someone who was less likely to be running a con on me.

would you check the validity of the data before you made up your mind

I'd check it after I'd thrown the messenger our and locked the door.

please be objective

I looked at the available evidence, which is that she doesn't share anywhere near enough of her data to support her conclusions.

She's also an holistic healer and a homeopath, with no experience in virology, epidemiology or vaccinations. She promotes quackery and snake oil. Seriously, look at her bio on the attached link. She claims that damaged tissue can hold memories, which can be released to cause PTSD, or that it can interfere with your Chakra and cause psychosis. If you dig a little I'm sure that her you will find her opinions on Autism. Go look, tell me where they speak to her credibility.

Link

You have insanely just tried to destroy the character of someone you have never met ?
You need extra training on how to be a shill, you're way too obvious.

originally posted by: Smigg

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Smigg

What's her full name?

According to your source, she is a specialist in "Psychotherapeutic medicine"?

Sounds legit.....

Oh little man, you've gone and given yourself away again.

How so, big man?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: Smigg

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Smigg

What's her full name?

According to your source, she is a specialist in "Psychotherapeutic medicine"?

Sounds legit.....

Oh little man, you've gone and given yourself away again.

How so, big man?

Your inability to control your emotions.

a reply to: Smigg

"I literally pulled my eyes from their sockets to check they're working ok, did you really say that ?".

Yes. Care to point to any post of mine where I have said otherwise?

Your eyes are working fine, it's your blinkers and confirmation bias that's your problem.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Smigg

confirmation bias

Yeah I get you all wrong

a reply to: Smigg

Yes, you do.

originally posted by: Smigg

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: Smigg

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Smigg

What's her full name?

According to your source, she is a specialist in "Psychotherapeutic medicine"?

Sounds legit.....

Oh little man, you've gone and given yourself away again.

How so, big man?

Your inability to control your emotions.

Oh, when was that, then, Spock?