It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Who " They " are is the Mystery to be Solved by one of Our " Smart Apes " one Day IMO ......
originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
a reply to: Zanti Misfit
Deir an Evededence.
Now, to stay in this topic, the moon, it can also be used to destroy certain pre biblical cities, by direct controlled flooding.
Not following Plato completely but using his words as a guide. The entrance was blocked by "Mud", as in the Ringed City.
Plato sites the gods as the ones responsible for the destruction of the ringed city, and if we study the moon in ancient history we see it was the home, heaven to the gods. Direct example is the moon god Alla.
Its now accepted that the Sahara, North Africa, was lush and green full of life up till 5500bc. More than that, it had lots of water, river networks. And, it had the Rings. How does ocean sand get on land...? And what, is under the sand, being hidden?
The following image in my opinion shows the aftermath of massive amounts of water being dumped on the rings, to destroy the city.
So, the moon gods can release water for various reasons, terraforming and destroying. So, how do they uptake water? A very long pipe, or as Enki calls it, proboscis. In essence a pipe to expel or uptake water. I believe the image above shows what it looks like when it expel's. What does it look like on the uptake?
And if your intention is to not only uptake water, but also,, sand. Sand that will be used to cover something up.
That is how I see ocean sand being deposited on land. The moons back side still sits in the vacuum of space and opening a valve on that side to de pressure the interior would cause a vaccum at the end of the proboscis pipe allowing sand and water to be vacuumed off the floor of the ocean. Later, that same water and sand can be released by opening valves on the atmosphere side, allowing the water sand to free fall onto, earth. I hate to put it this way, but its really that simple. But again, we were never allowed or encouraged to look in that direction.
external-content.duckduckgo.com... cb4fd76f7dee18aa1dcfb9128aa6a93a40e63f198921aef3bfc6a8&ipo=images
originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
a reply to: Zanti Misfit
For instance, ancient water based life was discovered in Wyoming, a petrified octopus. There is no doubts in my mind that Earth was originally terraformed and certain life forms were deposited. It was a lush green planet with only 3 large bodies of water. These bodies were no larger than the Mediterranean Sea, which is one of them.
The changes seem to have started some 65 70 million years ago. From the evidence it appears as though Earth was once again, terraformed, over, the original terraforming.
This is all revealed when one studies the age of the ocean beds. And since I started pointing these things out certain "Tom Foolery" has been taking place on the age charts. Prior to 65 70 million years ago Earth had a 35% oxygen content, this is very important to consider when studying the age of the oceans. The actual age of the massive oceans are no more than the timeline I gave. I contribute the higher oxygen content to the abundance of tree's and the lack of large oceans. More tree's, more oxygen, less tree's, less oxygen. The Water to land ratio.
The next thing to consider are the Dinosaur bones. Many from that timeline are found laying as if they were washed into a log jam, mixed with other species. And if you might imagine it would take some pretty impressive flooding to do that.
Before dealing with where the water came from we should look at the expanding earth model. Though not perfect it does show what happens when massive amounts of water are placed on earth, it expanded and would explain why earth has dry land today. The weight of the water squeezed the continents upward and in those pressures, mountain ranges were produced. I question the dating of those mountain ranges and the method.
Yes. I have read that their are a series of desert/paradise cycles for North Africa.
Could that Maybe Imply the Earth's Directional Rotation has Changed Direction Numerous Times in the Ancient Past ?
originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
a reply to: Byrd
Do you understand the concept behind the word "Iconoclast" ??
originally posted by: Byrd
originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
a reply to: Byrd
Do you understand the concept behind the word "Iconoclast" ??
I understand it. This isn't iconoclastic. It's wrong.
Dallas (where I live) has lots of fossils of mososaurs, fish, clams, sharks, shellfish, and even ammonites. I've found quite a few, myself. There's fish and shells and trilobites in the rocks in Oklahoma.
"Expanding Earth" can't even come close to explaining that.
iconoclast
ī-kŏn′ə-klăst″
noun
One who attacks and seeks to overthrow traditional or popular ideas or institutions.
One who destroys sacred religious images.
A breaker or destroyer of images; a person conspicuously hostile to the use of images in Christian worship.
Thats nice lol lol At least, its a observation lol lol
There's fish and shells and trilobites in the rocks in Oklahoma.
originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: All Seeing Eye
drowninginabsurdity.org...
I did get a bit of New Info from that Site that I was not Aware of Before...........
DEFINITION OF MATTOID:
noun
" One who exhibits symptoms of mental degeneration but is not positively insane; a semi-insane person; a crank: a term used by Lombroso to designate a semi-insane person whose ideas and aims (often of a literary or artistic character), while they may simulate those of talent and even of genius, are marked by radical absurdities which the patient is unable, through mental weakness, to perceive. "
A person of congenitally abnormal mind bordering on insanity or degeneracy.
A person who displays such behaviour .
Seems I have Encountered a Few of Those in my Day , How about You ? .........*)
For many years now, physicians have had the highest suicide rate compared to people in any other line of work. Is this surprising? Does this happen because doctors are continually exposed to other people's problems? Because of something about a physician's lifestyle? Looking at these suicides more closely provides some answers.
A high suicide rate among psychiatrists (58 to 65/100,000 compared with that of the general population, 11/100,000) has been reported by the following:
As for the Mattiods out there , it Could be an Instance of Demon Possession , or just yet Another form of Mental Illness .